do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-353/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2010 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission (Application for interim measures — Financial assistance — Debit note for recovery of financial assistance — Application for suspension of execution — Failure to have regard to formal requirements — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, infringement of EU law, right to justice








C_2010346EN.01004301.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/43





Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2010 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission
(Case T-353/10 R)
(Application for interim measures - Financial assistance - Debit note for recovery of financial assistance - Application for suspension of execution - Failure to have regard to formal requirements - Inadmissibility)
2010/C 346/86
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tzannini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of execution of a debit note issued by the Commission on 22 July 2010 for the recovery of the sum of EUR 109 415,20 paid in the context of financial assistance in support of a medical research project.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed;










2.


Costs are reserved.
Case C-507/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), lodged on 25 October 2010 — Denise Bernardi, represented by Katia Mecacci v Fabio Bernardi
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, criminal procedure, interpretation of the law, juvenile court, victim








C_2011013EN.01002002.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/20





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), lodged on 25 October 2010 — Denise Bernardi, represented by Katia Mecacci v Fabio Bernardi
(Case C-507/10)
()
2011/C 13/36
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Firenze

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimant: Denise Bernardi, represented by Katia Mecacci

Defendant: Fabio Bernardi

Question referred

Must Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings (1) be interpreted as precluding national provisions, such as Article 392(1a) of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure, in so far as the latter does not impose an obligation on the Public Prosecutor to request an early hearing and examination of a victim who is a minor by means of the Special Inquiry procedure prior to the main proceedings, and Article 394 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which does not make it possible for that minor victim himself or herself to appeal to the courts against a negative decision by the Public Prosecutor on his or her request to be heard in accordance with the appropriate Special Inquiry procedure?


(1)  OJ 2001 L 82, p. 1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 960/2010 of 25 October 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit








L_2010280EN.01000801.xml










26.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 280/8








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 960/2010
of 25 October 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 October 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 25 October 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MA 


78,7 




MK 


80,0 




XS 


73,2 




ZZ 


77,3 




0707 00 05 


MK 


87,5 




TR 


152,9 




ZZ 


120,2 




0709 90 70 


TR 


143,9 




ZZ 


143,9 




0805 50 10 


AR 


88,4 




BR 


68,9 




CL 


65,0 




TR 


93,2 




UY 


61,0 




ZA 


90,2 




ZZ 


77,8 




0806 10 10 


BR 


220,8 




TR 


133,9 




US 


155,2 




ZA 


64,2 




ZZ 


143,5 




0808 10 80 


AR 


77,3 




BR 


59,6 




CL 


110,2 




CN 


82,6 




NZ 


101,3 




US 


82,6 




ZA 


94,6 




ZZ 


86,9 




0808 20 50 


CN 


92,7 




ZA 


88,6 




ZZ 


90,7 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-528/09: Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 25 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Estonia, consumer information, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, exchange of information, financing, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, waste management








C_2011030EN.01003102.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/31





Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 25 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
(Case C-528/09) (1)

()
2011/C 30/50
Language of the case: Estonian
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 63, 13.03.2010.
Case C-508/10: Action brought on 25 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: action for failure to fulfil an obligation, admission of aliens, discrimination on the basis of nationality, foreign national, residence permit








C_2011030EN.01001403.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/14





Action brought on 25 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands
(Case C-508/10)
()
2011/C 30/23
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and R. Troosters, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by requiring third-country nationals and their family members applying for long-term resident status to pay high and unfair charges, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2003/109/EC (1) and, accordingly, its obligations under Article 258 TFEU;










—


order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission regards the amount of EUR 201 to EUR 830, depending on the case, for the processing of an application for long-term resident status as disproportionate by comparison with the sum of EUR 30 which EU citizens are required to pay for a residence permit. Such a procedure cannot, therefore, be regarded as ‘fair’. In the Commission’s view, irrespective of whether they constitute payment for actual costs arising, such high charges can be ‘a means of hindering the exercise of the right of residence’ within the meaning of recital 10 in the preamble to the directive, and thus have a deterrent effect on third-country nationals wishing to avail themselves of the rights afforded to them by the directive. Moreover, this is supported by the fact that the Commission is receiving complaints in that respect from citizens.


(1)  Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).
Case T-18/10 R II: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council (Applications for interim measures — Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 — Trade in seal products — Ban on import and sale — Exception in favour of Inuit communities — Second application for suspension of operation of a measure — New facts — No urgency)
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: animal product, animal welfare, application of EU law, import restriction, marketing, protection of animals, seal, summary procedure








C_2010346EN.01004202.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/42





Order of the General Court of 25 October 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council
(Case T-18/10 R II)
(Applications for interim measures - Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 - Trade in seal products - Ban on import and sale - Exception in favour of Inuit communities - Second application for suspension of operation of a measure - New facts - No urgency)
2010/C 346/85
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (Ottawa, Canada), Nativak Hunters and Trappers Association (Qikiqtarjuaq, Canada), Pangnirtung Hunters’ and Trappers’ Association (Pangnirtung, Canada), Jaypootie Moesesie (Qikiqtarjuaq), Allen Kooneeliusie (Qikiqtarjuaq), Toomasie Newkingnak (Qikiqtarjuaq), David Kuptana (Ulukhaktok, Canada), Karliin Aariak (Iqaluit, Canada), Canadian Seal Marketing Group (Quebec, Canada), Ta Ma Su Seal Products (Cap-aux-Meules, Canada), Fur Institute of Canada (Ottawa), NuTan Furs, Inc. (Catalina, Canada), GC Rieber Skinn AS (Bergen, Norway), Inuit Circumpolar Conference Greenland (ICC) (Nuuk, Greenland, Denmark), Johannes Egede (Nuuk), Kalaallit Nunaanni Aalisartut Piniartullu Kattuffiat (KNAPK) (Nuuk) (represented by: J. Bouckaert and H. Viaene, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: European Commission (represented by: É. White, P. Oliver and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents); and Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, Y. de Vries, J. Langer and M. Noort, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on trade in seal products (OJ 2009 L 286, p. 36).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of the President of the General Court of 19 August 2010 in Case T-18/10 R II Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council, not published in the ECR, is cancelled.










3.


The costs are reserved.
2011/58/EU: Council Decision of 25 October 2010 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism
Date: 2010-10-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Morocco, association agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement, settlement of disputes, signature of an agreement, trade agreement (EU)








L_2011027EN.01000101.xml










1.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 27/1








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 25 October 2010
         
on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism
(2011/58/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


On 24 February 2006 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with partners in the Mediterranean region in order to establish a dispute settlement mechanism related to trade provisions.












(2)


Negotiations have been conducted by the Commission in consultation with the committee appointed pursuant to Article 207 of the Treaty and within the framework of the negotiating directives issued by the Council.












(3)


These negotiations have been concluded and an Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 9 December 2009.












(4)


This Agreement should be signed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism is hereby approved on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement (1).


Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 25 October 2010.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published with the Decision on its conclusion.