do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5977 — Faurecia/Plastal)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-10-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2010282EN.01000301.xml










19.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5977 — Faurecia/Plastal)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 282/03
On 29 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5977. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No CHAP/2010/723
Date: 2010-10-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Commission, complaint to the Commission, health care system, job mobility








C_2010282EN.01003801.xml










19.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/38





Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No CHAP/2010/723
2010/C 282/10






1.


The European Commission has received and registered under No CHAP/2010/723 a number of complaints about obstacles to mobility for doctors working in the public health sector in Navarra, Spain.










2.


Given the significant number of complaints it has received on this subject, the Commission, with a view to responding swiftly and informing those concerned while making the most economical use of its administrative resources, is publishing this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Union and on the Internet at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm










3.


The complaint is currently being examined by the Commission in the light of the Community legislation on freedom of movement for workers (Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union).










4.


The complainants will be informed through the same channels of the results of this examination and of the action that the Commission decides to take.
Case C-500/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Ufficio IVA di Piacenza v Belvedere Costruzioni Srl
Date: 2010-10-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, VAT, harmonisation of standards, interpretation of the law, tax








C_2010346EN.01003403.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/34





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Ufficio IVA di Piacenza v Belvedere Costruzioni Srl
(Case C-500/10)
()
2010/C 346/59
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ufficio IVA di Piacenza

Defendant: Belvedere Costruzioni Srl

Question referred

Does Article 10 of the EC Treaty, now Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes, preclude [legislation such as] the legislation of the Italian State laid down in Article 3(2a) of Decree-Law No 40 of 25 March 2010, converted into Law No 73 of 22 May 2010, under which the court with jurisdiction in tax matters may not rule on the existence of an alleged tax debt which the Tax Authority has sought, in due time, to recover by appealing against an unfavourable decision and which thus in effect provides for the VAT debt at issue to be wholly waived in cases where the courts have ruled both at first instance and at the first level of appeal that such a debt does not exist, without the taxable person in favour of whom the waiver has operated having to pay even a fraction of the debt at issue?