do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 872/2010 of 4 October 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit








L_2010261EN.01000101.xml










5.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 261/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 872/2010
of 4 October 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 October 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 October 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MA 


84,4 




MK 


47,7 




XS 


54,8 




ZZ 


62,3 




0707 00 05 


MK 


26,7 




TR 


76,8 




ZZ 


51,8 




0709 90 70 


TR 


81,7 




ZZ 


81,7 




0805 50 10 


AR 


106,3 




BR 


105,9 




CL 


145,9 




IL 


121,9 




MA 


148,6 




TR 


98,3 




UY 


128,7 




ZA 


103,4 




ZZ 


119,9 




0806 10 10 


BR 


204,7 




TR 


120,7 




ZA 


62,8 




ZZ 


129,4 




0808 10 80 


AR 


56,2 




AU 


203,7 




BR 


52,7 




CL 


98,5 




CN 


82,6 




NZ 


102,8 




US 


84,3 




ZA 


74,7 




ZZ 


94,4 




0808 20 50 


CN 


99,0 




ZA 


88,6 




ZZ 


93,8 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case F-93/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Blessemaille v Parliament
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action for annulment, indemnification, legal expenses








C_2010328EN.01006103.xml










4.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/61





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Blessemaille v Parliament
(Case F-93/10)
()
2010/C 328/100
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Philippe Blessemaille (Remich, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 8 under the 2009 promotion procedure and for compensation in respect of the non-material damage suffered

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Parliament, published on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted from grade AST 7 to grade AST 8 under the 2009 promotion procedure;










—


As a result of that annulment, carry out a new comparative examination of the merits of the applicant and the other candidates under the 2008 and 2009 promotion procedures and accord to the applicant the promotion to grade AST 8 with retroactive effect as from 1 January 2008 as well the payment of interest on arrears of remuneration as from 1 January 2008 at two points above the European Central Bank rate for main refinancing operations, without, however, calling into question the promotions of the other officials promoted;










—


Order the Parliament to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 3 500 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered as a result of his not being promoted on 1 January 2008, subject to the possibility of an increase in the course of the proceedings;










—


In the alternative, if the Tribunal should take the view that the promotion to grade AST 8 cannot take effect before 1 January 2009, order the Parliament to pay additional damages as compensation for material damage of an amount corresponding to the difference in salary between that actually received in 2008 and that which should have been received in 2008 following the promotion on 1 January 2008, and calculated in respect of the period either from 1 January to 31 December 2008 or from 1 January to 31 August 2008, depending on the date on which the disputed promotion is deemed to have taken effect (respectively 1 January 2009 or 1 September 2008);










—


Order the Parliament to pay the costs.
Case T-480/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, foodstuffs legislation, maize








C_2010346EN.01005002.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/50





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
(Case T-480/10)
()
2010/C 346/97
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Département du Gers (Auch, France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P. Mignard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


annul Decision 2010/426/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize Bt11xGA21 (SYN-BTØ11-1xMON-ØØØ21-9) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical or essentially the same as those raised in Case T-478/10 Département du Gers v Commission.
Case T-481/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, foodstuffs legislation, maize








C_2010346EN.01005003.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/50





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
(Case T-481/10)
()
2010/C 346/98
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Département du Gers (Auch, France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P. Mignard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


annul Decision 2010/429/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON 88017 x MON 810 (MON-88Ø17-3 x MON-ØØ81Ø-6) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical or essentially the same as those raised in Case T-478/10 Département du Gers v Commission.
Case F-94/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Carpenito v Council
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, pay








C_2011013EN.01004101.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/41





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Carpenito v Council
(Case F-94/10)
()
2011/C 13/81
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Renzo Carpenito (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for the retention of the effects of the contested salary statements until the adoption of a regulation replacing, with retroactive effect, Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009, and for compensation in respect of the applicant’s financial loss and his pain and suffering

Form of order sought







—


Retain the effects of the contested salary statements until the adoption of a regulation replacing, with retroactive effect, Regulation No 1296/2009;










—


order the Council to compensate the applicant for his financial loss in an amount equivalent to the loss of remuneration resulting from the manifestly unlawful application of Regulation No 1296/2009, to which must be added reimbursement of the special monthly charge deducted since January 2010 pursuant to Article 66a of the Statute, the rate of which was wrongly fixed in the light of that regulation. That amount is estimated, subject to the Civil Service Tribunal’s interpretation, at EUR 30 000;










—


order the Council to pay the applicant the symbolic amount of EUR 1 as compensation for his pain and suffering;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.
Case F-97/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Kerstens v Commission
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, pay








C_2011013EN.01004102.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/41





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Kerstens v Commission
(Case F-97/10)
()
2011/C 13/82
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application to maintain the effects of contested salary slips pending the adoption of a regulation replacing, with retroactive effect, Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009 and for payment of damages for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought







—


the maintenance of the effects of contested salary slips pending the adoption of a regulation replacing, with retroactive effect, Regulation No 1296/2009;










—


order the Commission to compensate the applicant for the financial loss he suffered by the payment of a sum to the amount equivalent to the loss of earnings resulting from the application of the manifestly illegal Regulation No 1296/2009, plus the repayment of the part of the special levy applied monthly since January 2010 in accordance with Article 66 of the Staff Regulations, the rate of which was erroneously fixed taking account of that regulation: that amount is estimated, without prejudice to the interpretation of the Tribunal, at between EUR 40 000 and EUR 50 000, excluding default interest which was also applied for by the applicant;










—


order the Commission to pay symbolic damages of one euro to the applicant for the non-material damage he suffered;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-532/09 P: Order of the Court of 4 October 2010 — Vladimir Ivanov v European Commission (Appeal — Action for non-contractual liability — Loss of an opportunity for recruitment — Abuse of process — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), admissibility, damages, discrimination on the basis of nationality, equal treatment, judicial proceedings, recruitment








C_2011080EN.01000802.xml










12.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/8





Order of the Court of 4 October 2010 — Vladimir Ivanov v European Commission
(Case C-532/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for non-contractual liability - Loss of an opportunity for recruitment - Abuse of process - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2011/C 80/14
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Vladimir Ivanov (represented by: F. Rollinger, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 30 September 2009 in Case T-166/08 Ivanov v Commission dismissing the action brought by the appellant in order to obtain compensation for the damage he allegedly suffered following a Commission decision refusing to recruit him as a local administrative and technical assistance employee at the Commission delegation in Sofia — Autonomous nature of the action for non-contractual liability as opposed to the action for annulment — Abuse of process — Possibility of the Court of First Instance raising that rule of its own motion

Operative part of the order







1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Ivanov to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 51, 27.02.2010.
Case T-479/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, foodstuffs legislation, maize








C_2010346EN.01005001.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/50





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
(Case T-479/10)
()
2010/C 346/96
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Département du Gers (Auch, France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P. Mignard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Annul Decision 2010/420/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON89034xNK603 (MON-89Ø34-3xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical or essentially the same as those raised in Case T-478/10 Département du Gers v Commission.
Case T-482/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
Date: 2010-10-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, foodstuffs legislation, maize








C_2010346EN.01005004.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/50





Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission
(Case T-482/10)
()
2010/C 346/99
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Département du Gers (Auch, France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P. Mignard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


annul Decision 2010/432/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507x59122 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical or essentially the same as those raised in Case T-478/10 Département du Gers v Commission.