do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2010/571/EU of 24 September 2010 amending, for the purposes of adapting to scientific and technical progress, the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for applications containing lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls or polybrominated diphenyl ethers ( OJ L 251, 25.9.2010 )
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: dangerous substance, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, metals, public health, technological change, waste management, waste recycling








L_2010254EN.01004801.xml










29.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 254/48







Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2010/571/EU of 24 September 2010 amending, for the purposes of adapting to scientific and technical progress, the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for applications containing lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls or polybrominated diphenyl ethers
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 251 of 25 September 2010
)

On page 30 to 31, Annex, the following entries should read:








Exemption


Scope and dates of applicability




‘1(c)


For general lighting purposes ≥ 50 W and < 150 W: 5 mg


 




1(e)


For general lighting purposes with circular or square structural shape and tube diameter ≤ 17 mm


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 7 mg may be used per burner after 31 December 2011




2(a)(1)


Tri-band phosphor with normal lifetime and a tube diameter < 9 mm (e.g. T2): 5 mg


Expires on 31 December 2011; 4 mg may be used per lamp after 31 December 2011




2(a)(2)


Tri-band phosphor with normal lifetime and a tube diameter ≥ 9 mm and ≤ 17 mm (e.g. T5): 5 mg


Expires on 31 December 2011; 3 mg may be used per lamp after 31 December 2011




2(a)(3)


Tri-band phosphor with normal lifetime and a tube diameter > 17 mm and ≤ 28 mm (e.g. T8): 5 mg


Expires on 31 December 2011; 3,5 mg may be used per lamp after 31 December 2011




3(a)


Short length (≤ 500 mm)


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 3,5 mg may be used per lamp after 31 December 2011




3(b)


Medium length (> 500 mm and ≤ 1 500  mm)


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 5 mg may be used per lamp after 31 December 2011




4(b)-I


P ≤ 155 W


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 30 mg may be used per burner after 31 December 2011




4(b)-II


155 W < P ≤ 405 W


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 40 mg may be used per burner after 31 December 2011




4(c)-I


P ≤ 155 W


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 25 mg may be used per burner after 31 December 2011




4(c)-II


155 W < P ≤ 405 W


No limitation of use until 31 December 2011; 30 mg may be used per burner after 31 December 2011’
Statement of revenue and expenditure for the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency
Subjects: EU office or agency, audiovisual communications policy, cultural policy, education policy, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010264EN.01001501.xml










29.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/15





Statement of revenue and expenditure for the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 264/04)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY





1 0


EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY


49 524 497


– 550 000


48 974 497




 



Title 1 — Total




49 524 497




– 550 000




48 974 497






2






MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





 



Title 2 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




49 524 497




– 550 000




48 974 497





EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


27 193 000


– 364 000


26 829 000




1 3


MISSION AND TRAVEL EXPENSES


800 000


–80 000


720 000




1 4


SOCIO-MEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


635 000


26 000


661 000




 



Title 1 — Total




29 273 000




– 418 000




28 855 000






2






BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 0


RENTAL OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


5 546 000


186 000


5 732 000




2 1


DATA PROCESSING


3 807 000


54 000


3 861 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


349 000


11 000


360 000




2 3


ORDINARY ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATING EXPENDITURE


278 000


–3 000


275 000




2 4


POSTAGE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS


841 000


–5 000


836 000




2 6


ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LINKED TO OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES


9 430 497


– 375 000


9 055 497




 



Title 2 — Total




20 251 497




– 132 000




20 119 497





 



GRAND TOTAL




49 524 497




– 550 000




48 974 497





Estimate of number of contract staff (expressed in full-time equivalents) and seconded national experts







Contract staff posts


2010


2009




FG IV


77


77




FG III + FG II + FG I


247


224




Total FG


324


301




Seconded national experts posts


0


—





Total




324




301
Case C-91/10: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands)) — VAV-Autovermietung GmbH v Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst/Douane Zuid/kantoor Roosendaal (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Freedom to provide services — Articles 49 EC to 55 EC — Motor vehicles — Use in one Member State of a motor vehicle registered and hired in another Member State — Taxation of that vehicle in the first Member State upon its first use on the national road network)
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, freedom to provide services, interpretation of the law, vehicle registration, vehicle tax








C_2011030EN.01001301.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/13





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands)) — VAV-Autovermietung GmbH v Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst/Douane Zuid/kantoor Roosendaal
(Case C-91/10) (1)

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Freedom to provide services - Articles 49 EC to 55 EC - Motor vehicles - Use in one Member State of a motor vehicle registered and hired in another Member State - Taxation of that vehicle in the first Member State upon its first use on the national road network)
2011/C 30/19
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: VAV-Autovermietung GmbH

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst/Douane Zuid/kantoor Roosendaal

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank Breda — Interpretation of Articles 56 TFEU to 62 TFEU — National legislation providing for the levy of a registration tax upon the first use of a vehicle on the national road network

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 EC to 55 EC must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, pursuant to which a person residing or established in one Member State who uses, in that Member State, a motor vehicle registered and hired in another Member State must, upon the first use of that vehicle on the road network of the first Member State, pay in full a tax the balance of which, calculated according to the duration of use of the vehicle on the network, is reimbursed, without interest, after that use has ended.


(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5902 — LWM/RWI/F&F)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, food industry, merger control








C_2010262EN.01002201.xml










29.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/22





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5902 — LWM/RWI/F&F)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 262/11






1.


On 21 September 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Lamb Weston/Meijer VOF, through its subsidiary LWM Potatoes BV (‘LWM’, the Netherlands) and RWI International Holding GmbH (‘RWI’, Austria), ultimately controlled by RWA Raiffeisen Ware Austria AG (‘RWA’, Austria), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Frisch & Frost Nahrungsmittel-Gesellschaft m.b.H. (‘F&F’, Austria), currently controlled by RWA, by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


LWM: production and sale of deep-frozen potato products and dehydrated potato products (potato flakes) as well as sale of deep-frozen appetizers. LWM serves customers in the food service sector, fast food chains and the retail sector,










—


RWA: purchase and sale of agricultural products, agricultural supplies and consumer goods,










—


RWI: holding company with no business activity of its own, ultimately controlled by RWA,










—


F&F: production and sale of frozen and chilled food products to the food service sector, fast food chains and retail sector.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5902 — LWM/RWI/F&F, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Case F-5/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 29 September 2010 — Brune v Commission (Civil service — General competition — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Conduct of the oral test — Stability of the selection board)
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, European Parliament, action by staff, competition (EU)








C_2011030EN.01005801.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/58





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 29 September 2010 — Brune v Commission
(Case F-5/08) (1)

(Civil service - General competition - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Conduct of the oral test - Stability of the selection board)
2011/C 30/107
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Markus Brune (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: H. Mannes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to place the applicant on the reserve list in Competition AD/26/05 because of the insufficiency of his oral test.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the Commission’s decision of 10 May 2007 not to place Mr Brune on the reserve list in Competition EPSO/AD/26/05;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008, p. 69.
Statement of revenue and expenditure for the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: European Commission, Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency
Subjects: EU office or agency, expenditure, financial year, personnel administration, publication of accounts, revenue, trans-European network, transport network








C_2010264EN.01002701.xml










29.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/27





Statement of revenue and expenditure for the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 264/07)
EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF EXPENDITURES





1 1


SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES


6 407 000


– 236 000


6 171 000




1 4


SOCIO, INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING


230 000


17 000


247 000




 



Title 1 — Total




6 824 500




– 219 000




6 605 500






2






INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURES





2 0


OFFICES


1 659 000


211 500


1 870 500




2 1


COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE


490 000


–59 000


431 000




2 2


GOODS, PIECES OF FURNITURE AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES


50 000


16 000


66 000




2 4


TELECOMMUNICATION AND EXPENSES OF POSTING


50 000


–9 000


41 000




 



Title 2 — Total




2 337 500




159 500




2 497 000






3






TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES





3 2


INFORMATION AND PUBLICATIONS


130 000


7 000


137 000




3 3


OTHER TECHNICAL EXPENSES AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT


477 000


52 500


529 500




 



Title 3 — Total




632 000




59 500




691 500





 



GRAND TOTAL




9 794 000




0




9 794 000
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5963 — Econocom/ECS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, telecommunications industry








C_2010262EN.01002301.xml










29.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/23





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5963 — Econocom/ECS)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 262/12






1.


On 20 September 2010, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Econocom Group SA/NV (‘Econocom’, Belgium) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Europe Computer Systèmes SA (‘ECS’, France) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Econocom: management of IT infrastructure and telecommunications for companies,










—


ECS: management and running of company IT systems.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5963 — Econocom/ECS, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Joined Cases C-74/10 P and C-75/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2010 — European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL v European Commission (Appeal — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice — Representation of a party by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, action for annulment (EU), appeal, control of State aid, credit insurance, nuclear power station








C_2011080EN.01000901.xml










12.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/9





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2010 — European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL v European Commission
(Joined Cases C-74/10 P and C-75/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Representation of a party by a lawyer who is not a third party - Manifest inadmissibility)
2011/C 80/15
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (represented by: J. Kuhbier, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk and N. Khan, Agents)

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2009 in Case T-94/07 EREF v Commission, in which the Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4963 final of 24 October 2006 declaring that certain sources of finance used by TVO for the construction of a nuclear reactor in Finland (‘Olkiluoto 3 Project’) do not constitute State aid — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeals are dismissed.










2.


European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
Case C-472/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pest Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 29 September 2010 — Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v Invitel Távközlési Zrt.
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, consumer protection, interpretation of the law, unfair terms of contract








C_2010346EN.01003202.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/32





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pest Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 29 September 2010 — Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v Invitel Távközlési Zrt.
(Case C-472/10)
()
2010/C 346/53
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pest Megyei Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság

Defendant: Invitel Távközlési Zrt.

Questions referred







1.


May Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as meaning that an unfair contract term is not binding on any consumer where a body appointed by law and competent for that purpose seeks a declaration of the invalidity of that unfair term which has become part of a consumer contract on behalf of consumers in an action in the public interest (popularis actio)?
May Article 6(1) of that directive be interpreted, where an order which benefits consumers who are not party to the proceedings is made, or the application of an unfair standard contract term is prohibited, in an action in the public interest, as meaning that an unfair term which has become part of a consumer contract is not binding on all consumers or as regards the future, so that the court has to apply the consequences in law thereof of its own motion?










2.


May Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13, in conjunction with points 1(j) and 2(d) of the annex applicable by virtue of Article 3(3) of that Directive, be interpreted as meaning that where a seller or supplier provides for a unilateral amendment of a contract term without explicitly describing the method by which prices vary or giving valid reasons in the contract, that contract term is unfair ipso jure?






(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
Case F-90/10: Action brought on 29 September 2010 — Florentiny v Parliament
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action for annulment, civil servant








C_2011055EN.01003603.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/36





Action brought on 29 September 2010 — Florentiny v Parliament
(Case F-90/10)
2011/C 55/67
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jean-François Florentiny (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nielsen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST6 in the 2009 promotion procedure.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 29 June 2010 rejecting the applicant's complaint;










—


Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 24 November 2009, published on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST6 in the 2009 promotion procedure;










—


Indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, in particular, classification in grade AST6, and that the promotion to grade AST6 must be backdated to the date on which it should have taken effect, namely 1 January 2009;










—


Award the applicant EUR 2 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered;










—


Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.
Case T-378/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2010 — CNH Global v OHIM (Combination of the colours red, black and grey for a tractor) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours red, black and grey applied to the exterior surfaces of a tractor — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2010-09-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), tractor, trade-mark law








C_2010317EN.01002601.xml










20.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 317/26





Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2010 — CNH Global v OHIM (Combination of the colours red, black and grey for a tractor)
(Case T-378/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours red, black and grey applied to the exterior surfaces of a tractor - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 317/45
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CNH Global NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Edenborough, Barrister, and R. Harrison, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2007 (Case R 1642/2006-1), relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a sign representing a tractor in red, black and grey

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CNH Global NV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007.