do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-468/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 September 2010 — Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF) v Administración del Estado
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, data protection, interpretation of the law, personal data








C_2010346EN.01003101.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/31





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 September 2010 — Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF) v Administración del Estado
(Case C-468/10)
()
2010/C 346/51
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF)

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995, on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data be interpreted as precluding the application of national rules which, in the absence of the interested party’s consent, and to allow processing of his personal data that is necessary to pursue a legitimate interest of the controller or of third parties to whom the data will be disclosed, not only require fundamental rights and freedoms not to be prejudiced, but also require the data to appear in public sources?










2.


Are the conditions for conferring on it direct effect, set out in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, met by the above-mentioned Article 7(f)?






(1)  OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31.
Case C-470/10: Action brought on 28 September 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Portugal, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, freedom to provide services, health care profession, recognition of vocational training qualifications, right of establishment








C_2010328EN.01001901.xml










4.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/19





Action brought on 28 September 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
(Case C-470/10)
()
2010/C 328/34
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and I.V. Rogalski, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic.

Form of order sought







—


Declare that, by maintaining a requirement of registration and accreditation by the Portuguese authorities for any temporary provision of services by Community patent agents who are already established in another Member State and by checking the professional qualifications of Community patent agents who travel to Portugal, even in relation to a temporary service, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 TFEU and Articles 5 to 7 of Directive 2005/36/EC (1) on the recognition of professional qualifications.










—


order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Portuguese legislation at issue prevents a patent and trade mark agent, legally established in another Member State, from exercising his activities of representation before the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI — Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial) in Portugal, when he travels there to provide services to clients located in another Member State, if he has not previously undergone a test examination to be accredited or recognised by that institute.


(1)  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22
Case C-469/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 September 2010 — Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, data processing, data protection, interpretation of the law, personal data








C_2010346EN.01003201.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/32





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 September 2010 — Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado
(Case C-469/10)
()
2010/C 346/52
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD)

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data be interpreted as precluding the application of national rules which, in the absence of the interested party’s consent, and in order to allow processing of his personal data that is necessary to satisfy a legitimate interest of the controller or of third parties to whom the data will be disclosed, not only require fundamental rights and freedoms not to be prejudiced, but also require the data to appear in public sources?










2.


Are the conditions for conferring on it direct effect, set out in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, met by the above-mentioned Article 7(f)?






(1)  OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31.
Cases F-39/10 and F-39/10 R: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment, indemnification








C_2011030EN.01006802.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/68





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission
(Cases F-39/10 and F-39/10 R)
()
2011/C 30/136
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010261EN.01000301.xml










28.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

27 September 2010
2010/C 261/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3477




JPY


Japanese yen


113,52




DKK


Danish krone


7,4503




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85040




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1710




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3257




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9145




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,570




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


276,69




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7096




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9497




RON


Romanian leu


4,2430




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9876




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4026




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3795




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4549




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8344




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7806




KRW


South Korean won


1 545,27




ZAR


South African rand


9,4390




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,0192




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2928




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 058,01




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1658




PHP


Philippine peso


59,158




RUB


Russian rouble


41,2235




THB


Thai baht


41,192




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3019




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8463




INR


Indian rupee


60,6730






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-445/10: Action brought on 28 September 2010 — HerkuPlast Kubern v OHIM — How (eco-pack)
Date: 2010-09-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, trade-mark law








C_2010317EN.01004501.xml










20.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 317/45





Action brought on 28 September 2010 — HerkuPlast Kubern v OHIM — How (eco-pack)
(Case T-445/10)
()
2010/C 317/79
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: HerkuPlast Kubern GmbH (Ering, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Heidi A.T. How (Harrow, United Kingdom)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 July 2010 in Case R 1014/2009-4;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Heidi A.T. How.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark including the word element ‘eco-pack’, for goods in Class 16.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark and international registration ‘ECOPAK’ for goods in Class 20.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue, and infringement of Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in so far as the Board of Appeal dismissed altogether the existence of any likelihood of confusion, its reasoning is, at various points, inherently contradictory and it inappropriately rejected as irrelevant arguments submitted by the applicant that are in fact relevant.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).