do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-85/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — AI v Court of Justice
Date: 2010-09-23
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, action for annulment, competition (EU), indemnification








C_2011013EN.01003902.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/39





Action brought on 23 September 2010 — AI v Court of Justice
(Case F-85/10)
()
2011/C 13/77
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AI (represented by: M. Erniquin, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the deliberations of the Selection Board concerning the results of the French test in internal competition on the basis of tests No CJ 12/09 and, to the extent necessary, annulment of the contracts and appointments of the persons who passed that competition and, second, annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s temporary staff contract, and application for compensation for damage.

Form of order sought







—


Annulment of the deliberations of the Selection Board relating to the French test in internal competition on the basis of tests No CJ 12/09;










—


to the extent necessary, annulment of the appointments of the 8 candidates who passed that test;










—


communication of the assessment criteria on the basis of which the selection was made;










—


principally, reclassification of the applicant’s fixed-term employment contract as a contract for an indefinite period, and therefore annulment of the decision not to renew her temporary staff contract of January 2009, and, consequently, her reinstatement as a member of the temporary staff; in the alternative, annulment of the decision not to renew her temporary staff contract of January 2009, and, therefore, her reinstatement as a member of the temporary staff;










—


consequently, recognition of the entitlement to compensation corresponding to the difference between the remuneration which she would have received had the contract in question continued on 1 January 2010 and the emoluments which she in fact received as from that date until the date of her actual reinstatement;










—


payment of compensation for the non-material damage suffered in particular as a result of the wrongful failure to renew her contract of employment, assessed at EUR 100 000 should the applicant’s reinstatement be ordered, or alternatively compensation of EUR 500 000 should it prove impossible to reinstate the applicant;










—


an order that the Court of Justice should pay the costs.
Case F-84/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — Chatzidoukakis v Commission
Date: 2010-09-23
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, school fees








C_2011013EN.01003901.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/39





Action brought on 23 September 2010 — Chatzidoukakis v Commission
(Case F-84/10)
()
2011/C 13/76
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Efstratios Chatzidoukakis (Schrassig, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to reduce the education allowance granted to the applicant on the ground that his son receives financial support from a Member State in the form of a bursary and a loan.

Form of order sought







—


Annul, first, the decision to reduce the ‘education allowance’ paid to the applicant as specified in the pay slip of February 2010, and the pay slip in question to the extent that it partially reduces the ‘education allowance’: second, the Commission decision of 26 February 2010 relating to the reduction of the ‘education allowance’ paid to the applicant and to the deduction of a sum of EUR 375 from that allowance, a deduction which appears on the pay slip of March 2010; third, the pay slip of March 2010, reducing the ‘education allowance’ paid to the applicant and containing a backdated reduction of EUR 375; fourth, the pay slips for the months of April to August 2010, to the extent that they contain a partial reduction of the ‘education allowance’; fifth, the Commission decision of 9 July 2010, expressly rejecting the complaint;










—


Refund, with interest, to the applicant the amounts deducted from his entitlements;










—


Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5925 — Metlife/Alico/Delam)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-09-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, insurance company, merger control, reinsurance








C_2010256EN.01000201.xml










23.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 256/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5925 — Metlife/Alico/Delam)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 256/02
On 24 August 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5925. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.