do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Macro-financial assistance for the Republic of Moldova ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 September 2010 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (COM(2010)0302 – C7-0144/2010 – 2010/0162(COD))#P7_TC1-COD(2010)0162 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 7 September 2010 with a view to the adoption of Decision No …/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova
Date: 2010-09-07
Institutions: Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, European neighbourhood policy, Moldova, economic stabilisation, financial aid, macroeconomics, reflation








CE2011308EN.01009402.xml










20.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CE 308/94





Tuesday 7 September 2010Macro-financial assistance for the Republic of Moldova ***I
P7_TA(2010)0293
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 September 2010 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (COM(2010)0302 – C7-0144/2010 – 2010/0162(COD))
2011/C 308 E/22
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2010)0302),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0144/2010),
having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0242/2010),






1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;










2.


Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;










3.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






Tuesday 7 September 2010P7_TC1-COD(2010)0162
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 7 September 2010 with a view to the adoption of Decision No …/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament’s position corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 938/2010/EU)
Case T-403/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON)
Date: 2010-09-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment








C_2010328EN.01003102.xml










4.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/31





Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON)
(Case T-403/10)
()
2010/C 328/54
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Brighton Collectibles, Inc. (City of Industry, USA) (represented by: R. Delorey, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Felmar (Paris, France)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in case R 408/2009-4;










—


Annul all costs orders made against the applicant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BRIGHTON’, for goods in class 25

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: Non-registered word and figurative trade marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and ‘Brighton’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Italy in respect of belts; well-known word and figurative trade marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and ‘Brighton’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Italy in respect of leather goods, hats, jewellery and watches

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in law, in finding that the earlier rights on which the opposition was based not to have been substantiated; infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal incorrectly excluded likelihood of confusion.
Case T-371/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Amor v OHIM — Jablonex Group (AMORIKE)
Date: 2010-09-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, clothing industry, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01006202.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/62






Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Amor v OHIM — Jablonex Group (AMORIKE)
(Case T-371/10)
()
(2010/C 288/112)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Amor GmbH (Obertshausen, Germany) (represented by: M. Hartmann, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jablonex Group a.s. (Jablonec nad Nisou, Czech Republic)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 June 2010 in Case R 619/2009-2;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Jablonex Group a.s.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘AMORIKE’ for goods and services in Classes 14, 25 and 26.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Amor GmbH.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Internationally-registered word mark ‘AMOR’ for goods in Class 14; Community figurative marks containing the word element ‘Amor’ for goods in Classes 14 and 18; national figurative marks containing the word element ‘Amor’ for goods in Class 25, and national figurative marks which are orange in colour and which contain the word element ‘Amor’ for goods in Classes 9, 14, 18, 35 and 42.

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) in that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).