do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-58/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Abandonment of an intended concentration — Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for annulment (EU), concentration of the population, motorway, transport infrastructure








C_2010288EN.01004101.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/41






Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission
(Case T-58/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Concentrations - Abandonment of an intended concentration - Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)
(2010/C 288/78)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Schemaventotto SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini, G. Rizza and M. Piergiovanni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Abertis Infraestructuras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Roca Junyent and P. Callol García, lawyers)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision or decisions allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 13 August 2008 concerning the proceeding opened under Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1) in relation to the concentration between the intervener and Autostrade SpA (Case COMP/M.4388 Abertis v Autostrade)

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Schemaventotto SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










3.


Abertis Infraestructuras, SA shall bear its own costs..






(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.
Case C-290/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Scott SA, Département du Loiret, French Republic (Appeal — State aid — Preferential price for the purchase of developed land — Inquiry as to market value — Formal investigation procedure — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination — Scope of the Commission’s power freely to assess value — Costs method — Scope of review by the Courts)
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, France, State aid, action for annulment, appeal, industrial plot, sanction (EU)








C_2010288EN.01000602.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/6






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Scott SA, Département du Loiret, French Republic
(Case C-290/07 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Preferential price for the purchase of developed land - Inquiry as to market value - Formal investigation procedure - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination - Scope of the Commission’s power freely to assess value - Costs method - Scope of review by the Courts)
(2010/C 288/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Flett, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: Scott SA (represented by: J. Lever QC, R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors, and by P. Gardner and G. Peretz, Barristers), Département du Loiret (represented by: A. Carnelutti, avocat), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, S. Seam and F. Million, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance delivered on 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities by which the Court annulled Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberley-Clark (OJ 2000 L 12, p. 1) in so far as it concerns aid granted in the form of a preferential land price referred to in Article 1 of the decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 Scott v Commission.










2.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union.










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.
Case C-28/10 P: Order of the Court of 2 September 2010 — Mehmet Salih Bayramoglu v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeals — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Irregular form of order sought — Clear inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Cyprus, European Parliament, European election, General Court (EU), Türkiye, action for annulment








C_2010346EN.01002202.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/22





Order of the Court of 2 September 2010 — Mehmet Salih Bayramoglu v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-28/10 P) (1)

(Appeals - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Irregular form of order sought - Clear inadmissibility)
2010/C 346/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Mehmet Salih Bayramoglu (represented by: A. Riza QC)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: C. Karamarcos and N. Görlitz, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and E. Finnegan, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2009 in Case T-110/09 Bayramoglu v Parliament and Council, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action for annulment of Council Decision 2004/511/EC of 10 June 2004 concerning the representation of the people of Cyprus in the European Parliament in case of a settlement of the Cyprus problem — Action brought out of time

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Bayramoglu shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
Case T-123/08: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Spitzer v OHIM — Homeland Housewares (Magic Butler) (Action for annulment — Applicant's failure to act — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, household article, household electrical appliance, machinery, trade-mark law








C_2010301EN.01002901.xml










6.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 301/29





Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Spitzer v OHIM — Homeland Housewares (Magic Butler)
(Case T-123/08) (1)

(Action for annulment - Applicant's failure to act - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 301/48
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Harald Spitzer (Hörsching, Austria) (represented by: T. H. Schmitz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Homeland Housewares LLC (Los Angeles, California, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2008 (Case R 1508/2006-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Homeland Housewares LLC and Harald Spitzer.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on this action;










2.


Mr Harald Spitzer is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.
Case T-125/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Gruener Janura v OHIM — Centum Aqua Marketing (Hundertwasser)
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, agricultural product, plastics, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01006603.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/66






Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Gruener Janura v OHIM — Centum Aqua Marketing (Hundertwasser)
(Case T-125/09) (1)

()
(2010/C 288/120)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 129, 6.6.2009.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 1 September 2010 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-09-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, interest








C_2010237EN.01000101.xml










2.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/1





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
1,00 % on 1 September 2010
Euro exchange rates (2)

1 September 2010
2010/C 237/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2800




JPY


Japanese yen


107,54




DKK


Danish krone


7,4446




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83105




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3490




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2967




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9425




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,735




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


286,30




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7091




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9896




RON


Romanian leu


4,2648




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9485




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4141




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3560




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,9542




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8112




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7277




KRW


South Korean won


1 516,73




ZAR


South African rand


9,4195




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,7187




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2774




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 511,57




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0047




PHP


Philippine peso


57,740




RUB


Russian rouble


39,3572




THB


Thai baht


39,903




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2369




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8128




INR


Indian rupee


59,9230






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.