do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-71/10: Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Cantisani v Commission
Date: 2010-08-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action by staff, civil servant, damage, personnel administration








C_2010317EN.01004901.xml










20.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 317/49





Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Cantisani v Commission
(Case F-71/10)
()
2010/C 317/87
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Nicola Cantisani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. de Lannoy, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission's decision rejecting the applicant's request for assistance in respect of harrassment and claim for compensation.

Forms of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Director of the Directorate General for Personnel and Administration of the Commission of 9 October 2009 (ADMIN.B2/JJ/jm 0(09)) whereby the adminstration decided it did not need to take action in respect of the applicant's request to the Commission for assistance of 29 January 2009;










—


Compensate the applicant for material and non-material damage suffered by reason of the acts of harrassment;










—


Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-370/10: Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission
Date: 2010-08-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, restriction on competition, rights of the defence








C_2010288EN.01006201.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/62






Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission
(Case T-370/10)
()
(2010/C 288/111)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Rubinetterie Teorema SpA (Flero, Brescia, Italy) (represented by: R. Cavani, lawyer, M. Di Muro, lawyer, P. Preda, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Annul Decision C(2010) 4185 of 23 June 2010;










—


In the alternative, impose a token fine;










—


In the further alternative, substantially reduce the fine imposed by the decision to such amount as the Court deems appropriate;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision contested in these proceedings is the same as that contested in Case T-368/10 Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in that case.
In particular, the applicant alleges:






—


Infringement of the rights of the defence in relation to Teorema and the consequent invalidity of the decision owing to:






—


the delay in communicating to Teorema the accusations made by the Commission;










—


the difficulties in accessing the file and the lack of an adequate extension of the time-limits;














—


The fact that there is no agreement whose purpose or effect is to prevent, restrict or distort competition and/or no adverse effects on Community trade, and










—


The incorrect assessment of the evidence relating to the alleged involvement of Teorema in Euroitalia’s meetings.