do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Italy, State aid, control of State aid, postal and telecommunications services, regional development








C_2010230EN.01000501.xml










26.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/5





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 230/02






Date of adoption of the decision


8.2.2010




Reference number of State Aid


N 596/09




Member State


Italy




Region


Lombardia




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Strategia per la riduzione del digital divide in Lombardia




Legal basis


Delibera Giunta Regionale Lombardia n. 10707/2009 «Determinazioni in ordine alla diffusione di servizi a banda larga nelle aree in digital divide in fallimento di mercato in Lombardia»; dlgs. 1 agosto 2003 n. 259, «Codice delle comunicazioni elettroniche»; dlgs. 7 marzo 2005 n. 82, «Codice della pubblica amministrazione digitale»; delibera CIPE n. 166, 21 dicembre 2007«Attuazione del Quadro Strategico Nazionale (QSN) 2007-2013 Programmazione del Fondo per le Aree Sottoutilizzate».




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Sectoral development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 41 million




Intensity


70 %




Duration (period)


Until 2011




Economic sectors


Post and telecommunications




Name and address of the granting authority


Regione Lombardia




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm






Date of adoption of the decision


6.7.2010




Reference number of State Aid


N 654/09




Member State


France




Region


Réunion




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aménagement de zones d'activités à la Réunion




Legal basis


Articles L. 1511-3 et L. 4211-1 du code général des collectivités territoriales




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Regional development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget








 


Annual budget: EUR 8,9 million










 


Overall budget: EUR 63 million








Intensity


—




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2013




Economic sectors


All sectors




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministère de l'intérieur, de l'outre-mer et des collectivités territoriales




27 rue Oudinot




75007 Paris




FRANCE








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Case T-352/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (RECTALCONTROL)
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, medical device, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01005402.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/54






Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (RECTALCONTROL)
(Case T-352/10)
()
(2010/C 288/101)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2010 in case R 1443/2009-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘RECTALCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 763/2010 of 26 August 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit








L_2010225EN.01000101.xml










27.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 225/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 763/2010
of 26 August 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 August 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 August 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


TR 


103,0 




ZZ 


103,0 




0707 00 05 


TR 


137,2 




ZZ 


137,2 




0709 90 70 


TR 


121,6 




ZZ 


121,6 




0805 50 10 


AR 


113,7 




CL 


137,9 




TR 


145,9 




UY 


142,1 




ZA 


162,0 




ZZ 


140,3 




0806 10 10 


BA 


91,2 




EG 


153,8 




TR 


116,5 




ZZ 


120,5 




0808 10 80 


AR 


102,3 




BR 


69,6 




CL 


95,9 




CN 


65,6 




NZ 


89,8 




US 


119,5 




UY 


95,9 




ZA 


89,2 




ZZ 


91,0 




0808 20 50 


AR 


115,4 




CL 


150,5 




TR 


133,1 




ZA 


104,1 




ZZ 


125,8 




0809 30 


TR 


133,9 




ZZ 


133,9 




0809 40 05 


BA 


59,1 




IL 


160,8 




XS 


59,7 




ZZ 


93,2 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United States, anti-dumping duty, anti-dumping legislation, originating product, plate, steel








C_2010230EN.01002101.xml










26.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/21





Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
2010/C 230/07
Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.
This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry




Grain oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel


United States of America


Anti-dumping duty


Council Regulation (EC) No 1371/2005 (OJ L 223, 27.8.2005, p. 1)


28.8.2010




Undertaking


Commission Decision 2005/622/EC (OJ L 223, 27.8.2005, p. 42)






(1)  OJ C 95, 15.4.2010, p. 9.

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
Case T-351/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (VESICACONTROL)
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, cardiovascular disease, medical device, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01005401.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/54






Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (VESICACONTROL)
(Case T-351/10)
()
(2010/C 288/100)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2010 in case R 1439/2009-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VESICACONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.
Case T-350/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (HEARTCONTROL)
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, gynaecology, medical device, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01005302.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/53






Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (HEARTCONTROL)
(Case T-350/10)
()
(2010/C 288/99)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 July 2010 in case R 1437/2009-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘HEARTCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.
Case T-349/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)
Date: 2010-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, gynaecology, medical device, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01005301.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/53






Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)
(Case T-349/10)
()
(2010/C 288/98)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2010 in case R 1436/2009-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘OVUMCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.