do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-272/09: Order of the General Court of 24 August 2010 — Pineapple Trademarks v OHIM — Dalmau Salmons (KUSTOM)
Date: 2010-08-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, trade-mark law








C_2010274EN.01003001.xml










9.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/30





Order of the General Court of 24 August 2010 — Pineapple Trademarks v OHIM — Dalmau Salmons (KUSTOM)
(Case T-272/09) (1)

()
2010/C 274/45
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
Case T-386/09: Order of the General Court of 24 August 2010 — Grúas Abril Asistencia v Commission (Action for annulment — Competition — Rejection of complaint — Measure against which actions may not be brought by individuals — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-08-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: action for annulment, advertising, family business, fine, fixing of prices, provision of services, redemption, road transport, termination of a contract








C_2010274EN.01002301.xml










9.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/23





Order of the General Court of 24 August 2010 — Grúas Abril Asistencia v Commission
(Case T-386/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Rejection of complaint - Measure against which actions may not be brought by individuals - Inadmissibility)
2010/C 274/35
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: R.L. García García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Castilla Contreras, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission letter of 7 August 2009 informing the applicant that the facts on which it has lodged the complaint do not permit the conclusion that there is an infringement of Articles 81 EC, 82 EC and 86 EC and that no action will be taken regarding its complaint.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed.










2.


Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL, shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.
Case F-69/10: Action brought on 24 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission
Date: 2010-08-24
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment, appointment of staff, indemnification








C_2010288EN.01007501.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/75






Action brought on 24 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-69/10)
()
(2010/C 288/142)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the fact that the defendant had sent a letter to a lawyer who was not yet the applicant's representative.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) should:






—


annul the decision, whatever its form, which brought about the rejection by the European Commission of the request of 30 October 2009 sent by the applicant to the appointing authority;










—


annul the note of 11 November 2009 (ADMIN.B.2/MB/1sD(09)29814);










—


in so far as is necessary, annul the Commission's rejection of the applicant's complaint to the appointing authority, dated 25 January 2010, against the decision rejecting the request of 30 October 2009; annul that decision; and uphold the request of 30 October 2009;










—


in so far as is necessary, annul Note HR.D.2/MB/1s Ares (2010) 251054, dated 10 May 2010, written in French and received by the applicant on 17 May 2010 enclosed with the attached translation of the note in Italian;










—


order the Commission to make reparation for the damage unjustly suffered by the applicant as a result of the fact that the note of 10 August 2009 (ADMIN.B.2/MB/ksD(09)20658) was sent by the Commission to Giuseppe Cipressa, avvocato, by paying to the applicant the sum of EUR 10 000, or such other sum — whether greater or smaller — as the CST may consider just and equitable;










—


order the Commission to pay to the applicant, with effect from the date following that on which the request of 30 October 2009 was received by the Commission until actual payment of the sum of EUR 10 000, interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum, with annual capitalisation;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.