do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 700/2010 of 4 August 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pemento de Herbón (PDO))
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Spain, designation of origin, early fruit and vegetables, location of production, product designation








L_2010203EN.01000701.xml










5.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/7








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 700/2010
of 4 August 2010
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pemento de Herbón (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pemento de Herbón’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2010.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 308, 18.12.2009, p. 51.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN
Pemento de Herbón (PDO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 701/2010 of 4 August 2010 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (PESCA e Nettarina di Romagna (PGI))
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, designation of origin, fruit, location of production, product designation








L_2010203EN.01000901.xml










5.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/9








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 701/2010
of 4 August 2010
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (PESCA e Nettarina di Romagna (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘PESCA e Nettarina di Romagna’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 134/98 (3).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (4), as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation. As no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been sent to the Commission, the amendments should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2010.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.

(3)  
            OJ L 15, 21.1.1998, p. 6.

(4)  
            OJ C 313, 22.12.2009, p. 27.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY
PESCA e Nettarina di Romagna (PGI)
Extract from the Decision concerning De Nederlandsche Bank pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, bank, credit institution, disclosure of information, liquidation








C_2010211EN.01001001.xml










4.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/10





Extract from the Decision concerning De Nederlandsche Bank pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
2010/C 211/07

Notice of court order

Upon the application of De Nederlandsche Bank in Amsterdam, the Amsterdam District Court by court order of 24 June 2010, No FTRK 10.1151, declared the emergency regulations (noodregeling), as referred to in Section 3:160 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act, applicable to the company with seat in the Netherlands

International Insurance Corporation (IIC) N.V.

with registered and business offices in Amsterdam at Entrada 123 (1096 EB). The basis for the emergency regulations lies in Part 3.5.5 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act. Save for exceptions, the emergency regulations are subject to Dutch law. Judge M. J. E. Geradts, a member of the Amsterdam District Court, was appointed as supervisory judge. P.H.M Versteeg and M. Pannevis, both with business offices at DLA Piper Nederland N.V., PO Box 75258, 1070 AG Amsterdam, NEDERLAND were appointed as administrators. De Nederlandsche Bank is the competent supervisory authority. This court order can be appealed within eight days with the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, Prinsengracht 436, 1017 KE Amsterdam, NEDERLAND. To the knowledge of the administrators, no appeal has been filed.
Corrigendum to notice 2010/C 205/02 for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision CFSP/413/2010 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 apply ( OJ C 205, 29.7.2010 )
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, nuclear non-proliferation, trade restriction








C_2010211EN.01001401.xml










4.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/14





Corrigendum to notice 2010/C 205/02 for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision CFSP/413/2010 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 apply

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 205 of 29 July 2010
)

2010/C 211/11
Page 6, first paragraph should read as follows:

‘The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




Rue de la Loi 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË’
Case C-392/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2010 — Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU customs procedure, import, interpretation of the law, third country








C_2010288EN.01002102.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/21






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2010 — Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
(Case C-392/10)
()
(2010/C 288/36)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam

Defendants: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Question referred

Is the condition for receipt of a differentiated refund established in Article 15(1) in conjunction with Article 15(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1999 L 102, p. 11), that is, completion of the customs import formalities, satisfied, when in the third country of destination following release for inward processing without collection of import duties the product undergoes a substantial processing or working within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1, as amended) and the product resulting from that processing or working is exported to a third country?
Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2010 of 4 August 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Lüneburger Heidekartoffeln (PGI))
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, designation of origin, location of production, potato, product designation








L_2010203EN.01000101.xml










5.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 697/2010
of 4 August 2010
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Lüneburger Heidekartoffeln (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Lüneburger Heidekartoffeln’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 August 2010.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 305, 16.12.2009, p. 24.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY
Lüneburger Heidekartoffeln (PGI)
Case T-321/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, trade-mark law








C_2010260EN.01002501.xml










25.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/25





Action brought on 4 August 2010 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)
(Case T-321/10)
()
2010/C 260/34
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: SA.PAR. Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bussoletti and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Salini Costruttori SpA (Rome, Italy)

Form of order sought







—


declare the present action admissible;










—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 on the grounds of breach of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and of a deficient statement of reasons;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘GRUPPO SALINI’ (registration application No 3 832 161) for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: SALINI COSTRUTTORI SpA.

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: Well-known trade mark in Italy, de facto trade mark, domain name and company name of ‘SALINI’ for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division and declaration of nullity of the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 53(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c), of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, breach of Article 52(1)(b) of that regulation, and deficient statement of reasons.
Case C-396/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Luxembourg, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, geographical information system, information network








C_2010274EN.01001802.xml










9.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/18





Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-396/10)
()
2010/C 274/28
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and V. Peere, Agents)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Form of order sought







—


declare that, failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (1) or, in any event, failing to inform the Commission of those provisions, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;










—


order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2007/2/EC expired on 14 May 2009. As at the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not notified the Commission thereof.


(1)  OJ L 108, p. 1.
Corrigendum to notice 2010/C 205/03 for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision CFSP/413/2010 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 apply ( OJ C 205, 29.7.2010 )
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, nuclear non-proliferation, trade restriction








C_2010211EN.01001402.xml










4.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/14





Corrigendum to notice 2010/C 205/03 for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision CFSP/413/2010 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 apply

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 205 of 29 July 2010
)

2010/C 211/12
Page 7, paragraph 4 should read as follows:

‘The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address, by 15 September 2010.





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




Rue de la Loi 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË’
Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2010 under certain quotas opened by the EU for pigmeat products
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: import, import licence, pigmeat, tariff quota








C_2010211EN.01000701.xml










4.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/7





Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2010 under certain quotas opened by the EU for pigmeat products
2010/C 211/05
Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2010 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2010 do not, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2010; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.


(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.


ANNEX






Quota order number


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2010
(in kg)




09.4038


8 089 050




09.4170


1 180 500




09.4204


1 156 000
Case C-394/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Luxembourg, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, national implementing measure








C_2010274EN.01001702.xml










9.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/17





Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-394/10)
()
2010/C 274/26
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Troosters and J. Sénéchal, Agents, Agents)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (1) or, in any event, by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of that directive;










—


order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2006/24/EC expired on 15 September 2007. As at the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not notified the Commission thereof.


(1)  OJ L 105, p. 54.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/412/EU of 13 July 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program ( OJ L 195, 27.7.2010 )
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: United States, agreement (EU), data protection, data transmission, financing, information processing, personal data, signature of an agreement, terrorism








L_2010202EN.01001601.xml










4.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 202/16







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/412/EU of 13 July 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 195 of 27 July 2010
)

On page 3, footnote 1:
for:







‘(1)


See page 5 of this Official Journal.’,





read:







‘(1)


See page 1 of this Official Journal.’.
Case C-395/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v French Republic
Date: 2010-08-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, France, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, geographical information system, information network








C_2010274EN.01001801.xml










9.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/18





Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v French Republic
(Case C-395/10)
()
2010/C 274/27
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and V. Peere, Agents)

Defendant: French Republic

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) or, in any event, by not communicating such measures to the Commission, France has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;










—


order the French Republic to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2007/2/EC expired on 14 May 2009. As at the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not notified the Commission thereof.