do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Act of 26 July 2010 extending the term of office of a Deputy Director of Europol
Date: 2010-07-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU police cooperation, Europol, appointment of members, board of directors, operation of the Institutions, personnel administration








C_2010206EN.01000101.xml










30.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 206/1





COUNCIL ACT
of 26 July 2010
extending the term of office of a Deputy Director of Europol
2010/C 206/01
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to Articles 56(1) and 38 of the Council Decision establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (1),
Having regard to the Decision of the Management Board of Europol of 4 June 2009 establishing the rules on the selection, extension of the term of office and dismissal of the Director and Deputy Directors of Europol (2), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,
Acting as the authority vested with the power to appoint the Director and Deputy Directors of Europol,
Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board,
Whereas:






(1)


The term of office of a deputy Director of Europol appointed by Council Act of 14 May 2007 (3), is due to expire by 31 July 2011.










(2)


The Deputy Directors of Europol are appointed for a four-year period extendable once in accordance with Article 38(2) of the Council Decision establishing the European Police Office (EUROPOL) (Europol Decision) (4).










(3)


The Management Board presented the Council with an unanimous opinion proposing that the term of office of the present Deputy Director of Europol, Mr Eugenio ORLANDI, be extended.










(4)


On the basis of the opinion provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to extend the term of office of Mr Eugenio ORLANDI as Deputy Director,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
The term of office of Mr Eugenio ORLANDI is hereby extended from 1 August 2011 to 31 July 2015.
Article 2
This Act shall take effect on the day of its adoption.
It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2010.


For the Council


The President

D. REYNDERS




(1)  OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37.

(2)  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 3.

(3)  OJ L 132, 24.5.2007, p. 35.

(4)  Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 (OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37).
Case F-86/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Vereecken v Commission
Date: 2010-07-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, professional career, promotion, staff assessment








C_2010288EN.01007602.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/76






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Vereecken v Commission
(Case F-86/06) (1)

()
(2010/C 288/145)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 19.
Case C-371/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 26 July 2010 — National Grid Indus BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond (kantoor Rotterdam)
Date: 2010-07-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, legal domicile, liquidation, offshoring, tax








C_2010328EN.01001101.xml










4.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/11





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 26 July 2010 — National Grid Indus BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond (kantoor Rotterdam)
(Case C-371/10)
()
2010/C 328/19
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: National Grid Indus BV

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond (kantoor Rotterdam)

Question referred







1.


If a Member State imposes on a company incorporated under the law of that Member State, which transfers its real company seat from that Member State to another Member State, a final settlement tax in respect of that transfer, can that company, in the present state of Community law, invoke Article 43 EC (now Article 49 TFEU) against that Member State?










2.


If the first question must be answered in the affirmative: is a final settlement tax such as the one at issue, which is applied, without deferment and without the possibility of taking subsequent decreases in value into consideration, to the capital gains relating to the assets of the company which were transferred from the exit Member State to the host Member State, as assessed at the time of the transfer of the company seat, contrary to Article 43 EC (now Article 49 TFEU), in the sense that such a final settlement tax cannot be justified by the necessity of allocating the power to impose taxes between the Member States?










3.


Does the answer to the previous question also depend on the circumstance that the final settlement tax in question relates to a (currency) profit which accrued under the tax jurisdiction of the Netherlands, whereas that profit cannot be reflected in the host Member State under the tax regime applicable there?