do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 16 July 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.866 (2) — Animal Feed Phosphates — Rapporteur: Greece
Date: 2010-07-16
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: Greece, animal nutrition, dominant position, market-sharing agreement, merger control, phosphate, restriction on competition








C_2011111EN.01001201.xml










9.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/12





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 16 July 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.866 (2) — Animal Feed Phosphates
Rapporteur: Greece
2011/C 111/07






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for each addressee of the draft decisions.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that there are neither aggravating nor mitigating circumstances applicable in this case for any addressee of the draft decisions.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the pertinent reduction, under the Settlement Notice, of the amount of the fine of the settling parties.










6.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay.










7.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines.










8.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 629/2010 of 16 July 2010 setting the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 2009/2010 marketing year
Date: 2010-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU aid, agro-industry, common organisation of markets, dried product, fodder, marketing








L_2010184EN.01000101.xml










17.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 629/2010
of 16 July 2010
         
setting the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 2009/2010 marketing year


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 90(c), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Article 88(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 sets the amount of aid to be paid to processors for dried fodder up to the maximum guaranteed quantity laid down in Article 89 of that Regulation.












(2)


In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 33(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 382/2005 of 7 March 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1786/2003 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (2), the Member States have notified the Commission of the quantities of dried fodder in respect of which entitlements to aid have been recognised for the 2009/2010 marketing year. These notifications indicate that the maximum guaranteed quantity for dried fodder has not been exceeded.












(3)


Therefore, in accordance with Article 88(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, the amount of the aid for dried fodder is EUR 33 per tonne.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The final amount of the aid for dried fodder for the 2009/2010 marketing year shall be EUR 33 per tonne.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 July 2010.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 61, 8.3.2005, p. 4.
Case F-58/10: Action brought on 16 July 2010 — Allgeier v FRA
Date: 2010-07-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, European official, action for annulment, indemnification








C_2010260EN.01002702.xml










25.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/27





Action brought on 16 July 2010 — Allgeier v FRA
(Case F-58/10)
()
2010/C 260/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Timo Allgeier (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the decision of the defendant not to pursue the complaint for harassment lodged by the applicant. Second, recognition that the applicant has been a victim of harassment conducted by his superiors, and compensation for material and non-material loss.

Form of order sought







—


The annulment of the decision of the Agency of Fundamental Rights dated 16 October 2009 rejecting the claims of the Appellant insofar as it does not recognize that he has been victim of an harassment conducted by Mr. M. and Mr. A. and, if necessary, the annulment of the decision dated 6 April 2010 rejecting the complaint;










—


the recognition that he has been victim of harassment conducted by Mr. M. and Mr. A. and the necessary disciplinary consequences; or, alternatively, (i) the opening of a new administrative enquiry, fair, independent and impartial with the creation of a panel of experts for the performance of the administrative enquiry and (ii) the adoption of all the necessary measures in order to allow a fair enquiry without any possible pressures and interferences;










—


the compensation of the Appellant’s material prejudice, provisionally evaluated at EUR 71 823,23;










—


the granting of EUR 85 000 in compensation of the moral prejudice resulting from the way the entire procedure was conducted and the Decision reached;










—


the condemnation of FRA to the payment of the costs.
Case C-356/10: Action brought on 16 July 2010 — European Commission v Ireland
Date: 2010-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ireland, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, award of contract, services contract, supplies contract, works contract








C_2010246EN.01003501.xml










11.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/35





Action brought on 16 July 2010 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-356/10)
()
2010/C 246/59
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Walker, D. Kukovec, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:







—


Declare that, in the context of the award procedure by the Department of Agriculture and Food for a public supply contract for animal identification tags, concerning the application of criteria relating to tenderers’ ability to perform the contract in question as award criteria, instead of selection criteria, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts;










—


order Ireland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the award criteria applied by the Department of Agriculture and Food included criteria reserved for the selection stage, namely criteria relating to tenderers’ ability to perform the contract in question and that, consequently, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of Directive 2004/18/EC.


(1)  OJ L 134, p. 114