do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2010 of 1 July 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit








L_2010168EN.01001701.xml










2.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 168/17








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 582/2010
of 1 July 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 July 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 July 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MA 


56,2 




MK 


36,4 




TR 


50,2 




ZZ 


47,6 




0707 00 05 


MK 


45,6 




TR 


121,6 




ZZ 


83,6 




0709 90 70 


TR 


103,7 




ZZ 


103,7 




0805 50 10 


AR 


79,8 




TR 


97,3 




UY 


91,0 




ZA 


98,0 




ZZ 


91,5 




0808 10 80 


AR 


102,2 




BR 


70,8 




CA 


118,4 




CL 


113,8 




CN 


84,3 




NZ 


122,9 




US 


162,8 




ZA 


98,8 




ZZ 


109,3 




0809 10 00 


TR 


234,1 




ZZ 


234,1 




0809 20 95 


TR 


307,6 




ZZ 


307,6 




0809 30 


AR 


133,5 




TR 


158,2 




ZZ 


145,9 




0809 40 05 


AU 


258,9 




IL 


210,4 




US 


110,3 




ZZ 


193,2 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-315/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Portugal, credit, interpretation of the law, jurisdiction, law of obligations, nationality








C_2010260EN.01000501.xml










25.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/5





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)
(Case C-315/10)
()
2010/C 260/06
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd

Defendants: Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)

Questions referred







1.


Does the fact that the Portuguese judicial authorities have declared that they lack jurisdiction by reason of nationality to hear an action concerning a commercial claim constitute an obstacle to the connection between causes of action referred to in Articles 6(1) and [28] of Regulation No 44/2001, (1) where the Portuguese court has another action pending before it, a Paulian action brought against both the debtor and the third-party transferee, in this case the transferee of a debt receivable, and the depositaries of the subject-matter of the claim assigned to the third-party transferee, the latter having their seats in Portugal, in order that they may all be bound by the res judicata decision to be given?










2.


In the event of a negative response, may Article 6(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 be freely applied to the case?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).
Case C-95/09: Order of the President of the Court of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Ireland
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ireland, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, territorial waters, urban centre, water treatment








C_2010346EN.01003702.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/37





Order of the President of the Court of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-95/09) (1)

()
2010/C 346/65
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.
Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 1 July 2010 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Národná banka Slovenska (ECB/2010/6)
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: European Central Bank, Slovenia, accountant, appointment of staff, auditing, central bank








C_2010184EN.01000101.xml










8.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/1





RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 1 July 2010
to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Národná banka Slovenska
(ECB/2010/6)
2010/C 184/01
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,
Whereas:






(1)


The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.










(2)


The mandate of Národná banka Slovenska’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2009. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2010.










(3)


Národná banka Slovenska has selected Ernst & Young Slovakia, spol. s r.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2010 to 2014,




HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Ernst & Young Slovakia, spol. s r.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Národná banka Slovenska for the financial years 2010 to 2014.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 1 July 2010.


The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET
Case F-50/10: Action brought on 1 July 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment, indemnification








C_2010260EN.01002701.xml










25.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/27





Action brought on 1 July 2010 — De Roos-Le Large v Commission
(Case F-50/10)
()
2010/C 260/36
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Simone Thérèse De Roos-Le Large ('s Hertogenbosch, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Lutjens and M.H. van Loon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision ordering the applicant to repay the amount of the survivor’s pension overpaid to her late mother

Form of order sought







—


Annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the Commission’s decision of 12 May 2010;










—


Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No 3/2010/SC of 1 July 2010 on internal cost sharing
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Standing Committee of the EFTA States
Subjects: EFTA countries, European Economic Area, financial aid, financing plan, gross domestic product




L_2011063EN.01002601.xml










10.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 63/26








            DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES
         
No 3/2010/SC
of 1 July 2010
         
on internal cost sharing


THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:



Article 1
The contributions of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (hereinafter referred to as the EFTA States) to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 are to be divided into five annual tranches and determined on the basis of Article 2.


Article 2

1.   The contributions of the EFTA States to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 are based on their Gross Domestic Products (GDP).


2.   For any EFTA State, the contribution for a specific financial year t is to be based on the available GDP data for the year t-2 and corresponds to that States’ share of GDP (t-2) in the overall GDP (t-2) of the EFTA States.


3.   For Iceland, the contribution to each of the five annual tranches may not exceed the amount of EUR 6,795 million.
If Iceland’s contribution for a specific financial year t, calculated on Iceland’s share of GDP (t-2) in the overall GDP (t-2) of the EFTA States, should exceed the amount of EUR 6,795 million, Liechtenstein and Norway shall be obliged to cover the excessive sum in proportion to their respective shares of GDP (t-2).


4.   The respective GDP data on which the contributions for a specific year t are to be based shall be delivered annually by each EFTA States by 1 March. They shall relate to the year t-2.


5.   Contributions shall be expressed in euros.



Article 3
The accession of an EFTA State to the EU shall not affect its obligation to contribute to the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 in accordance with this Decision.


Article 4
This Decision shall take effect on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the legal act establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014.


Article 5
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 1 July 2010.


For the Standing Committee


The Chairman

Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON
            

The Secretary-General

Kåre BRYN
            







ANNEX
The Standing Committee agrees that, before finalising possible negotiations regarding post 2014 financial contributions to reduce the economic and social disparities in the EEA, a review of the cost sharing mechanism in view of a change from GDP to GNI as the basis for the calculation shall take place.
Case T-53/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Italian Republic v Commission (State aid — Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest — Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of advantage — Principle of audi alteram partem)
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, action for annulment (EU), control of State aid, energy industry, preferential price








C_2010221EN.01003602.xml










14.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/36





Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Italian Republic v Commission
(Case T-53/08) (1)

(State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of advantage - Principle of audi alteram partem)
2010/C 221/57
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: S. Fiorentino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and G. Conte, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.
Case C-363/09: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/444/EEC — Plant protection products — Application for authorisation to place on the market — Data protection)
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, access to information, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, approximation of laws, confidentiality, infringement of EU law, market approval, marketing standard, pharmaceutical product, plant health product








C_2010234EN.01001501.xml










28.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/15





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
(Case C-363/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/444/EEC - Plant protection products - Application for authorisation to place on the market - Data protection)
2010/C 234/21
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Parpala and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. López-Medel Bascones, acting as Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 13 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1) — Data accompanying the application — Data use and protection — Confidentiality

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that by maintaining in force Article 38 of Ley 43/2002 de sanidad vegetal (Law 43/2002 on plant health) of 20 November 2002, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.
Case C-233/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Gerhard Dijkman, Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat (Freedom to provide services — Free movement of capital — Direct taxation — Difference in treatment according to the place of investment)
Date: 2010-07-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, infringement of EU law, interpretation of the law, investment, property market, residence, tax system








C_2010234EN.01001301.xml










28.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/13





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Gerhard Dijkman, Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat
(Case C-233/09) (1)

(Freedom to provide services - Free movement of capital - Direct taxation - Difference in treatment according to the place of investment)
2010/C 234/18
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Gerhard Dijkman, Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) — National income tax rules — Supplementary municipal tax calculated on the basis of the amount of income tax — Discharge resulting from withholding tax on movable assets — Different treatment according to the place of investment — Compatibility with Article 56(1) EC

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC precludes legislation of a Member State according to which taxpayers resident in that Member State who receive interest or dividends from investments made in another Member State are subject to a supplementary municipal tax when they have not elected for that income from moveable assets to be paid to them by an intermediary established in their Member State of residence, whereas income of the same type from investments made in their Member State of residence, because it is subject to withholding tax at source, need not be declared and, in that case, is not subject to the supplementary municipal tax.


(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.