do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: Community Plant Variety Office
Subjects: Community Plant Variety Office, amending budget, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010173EN.01001301.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/13





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 173/04)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






REVENUE





 



Title 1 — Total




11 787 000



 



11 787 000






2






SUBSIDIES





 



Title 2 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.






3






RESERVE





3 0


DEFICIT RESERVE


850 000


110 000


960 000




 



Title 3 — Total




850 000




110 000




960 000






5






REVENUE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS





 



Title 5 — Total




12 000



 



12 000






6






EXPENDITURE REFUNDING AND PROVIDED SERVICES INCOME





 



Title 6 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.






9






OTHER INCOME





 



Title 9 — Total




388 000



 



388 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




13 037 000




110 000




13 147 000





EXPENDITURE












Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount




Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments





1






STAFF WORKING WITHIN THE OFFICE





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


5 000 000


5 000 000


200 000


200 000


5 200 000


5 200 000




1 4


SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES


100 000


100 000


–90 000


–90 000


10 000


10 000




 



Title 1 — Total




5 422 000




5 422 000




110 000




110 000




5 532 000




5 532 000






2






BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





 



Title 2 — Total




1 487 000




1 487 000



 


 



1 487 000




1 487 000






3






OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE





 



Title 3 — Total




6 328 000




6 128 000



 


 



6 328 000




6 128 000






10






OTHER EXPENDITURE





 



Title 10 — Total




p.m.




p.m.



 


 



p.m.




p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




13 237 000




13 037 000




110 000




110 000




13 347 000




13 147 000





Establishment plan









Function group and grade


2010


2009




Permanent


Temporary


Permanent


Temporary




AD 16


—


—


—


—




AD 15


—


1


—


1




AD 14


—


—


—


—




AD 13


1


1


1


1




AD 12


1


—


1


—




AD 11


—


1


—


1




AD 10


1


1


—


1




AD 9


—


—


1


—




AD 8


—


—


—


—




AD 7


—


—


—


—




AD 6


—


2


—


1




AD 5


—


—


—


—




Total


3


6


3


5




AST 11


—


—


—


—




AST 10


—


—


—


—




AST 9


3


2


4


2




AST 8


2


3


2


2




AST 7


2


3


2


4




AST 6


—


6


—


6




AST 5


—


5


—


5




AST 4


1


5


1


5




AST 3


—


3


—


3




AST 2


—


—


—


—




AST 1


—


2


—


2




Total


8


29


9


29





Grand Total




11




35




12




34
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5802 — RWE Energy/Mitgas)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy distribution, exchange of information, merger control, natural gas








C_2010171EN.01000201.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5802 — RWE Energy/Mitgas)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 171/03
On 17 June 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5802. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5836 — Bilfinger Berger/Hertel/FridayEuroTech) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: civil engineering, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, temporary employment agency








C_2010171EN.01001601.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/16





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5836 — Bilfinger Berger/Hertel/FridayEuroTech)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 171/11






1.


On 18 June 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) (‘the Merger Regulation’) by which the undertakings BIS Industrial Services Nederland B.V. (‘BIS’), belonging to Bilfinger Berger AG (‘Bilfinger Berger’, Germany), and Hertel Beheer BV (‘Hertel’), belonging to Hertel Holding B.V. (‘Hertel Holding’, The Netherlands), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of FridayEuroTech Holding B.V. (‘FET’, The Netherlands), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Bilfinger Berger: civil engineering, construction, industrial projects, industrial services,










—


for Hertel: civil engineering, construction, defence services, industrial services,










—


for FET: temporary employment services.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5836 — Bilfinger Berger/Hertel/FridayEuroTech, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Case C-448/09 P: Order of the Court of 30 June 2010 — Royal Appliance International GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Earlier mark ‘sensixx’ — Word mark ‘Centrixx’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Application for revocation of an earlier mark — Proceedings pending before the national courts — Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court)
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, household electrical appliance, trade-mark law








C_2010288EN.01001701.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/17






Order of the Court of 30 June 2010 — Royal Appliance International GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH
(Case C-448/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Earlier mark ‘sensixx’ - Word mark ‘Centrixx’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Application for revocation of an earlier mark - Proceedings pending before the national courts - Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court)
(2010/C 288/27)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Royal Appliance International GmbH (represented by: K.-J. Michaeli and M. Schork, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgerate GmbH (represented by: S. Biagosch, Rechtsanwalt)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 15 September 2009 in Case T-446/09 Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2007, rejecting the registration of the word mark ‘Centrixx’ as a Community trade mark for certain goods in Class 7, by granting the opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘sensixx’ — Failure to stay the proceedings while awaiting the resolution of the dispute pending before the national courts concerning the application for revocation of the earlier mark — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Likelihood of confusion between two marks

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Royal Appliance International GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Police Office for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training
Subjects: Europol, amending budget, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010173EN.01001701.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/17





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Police Office for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 173/05)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9






REVENUE





9 0


SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS


79 724 150


263 438


79 987 588




9 1


HOST STATE CONTRIBUTION


244 000


1 136 060


1 380 060




9 2


OTHER REVENUE


100 000


2 790 850


2 890 850




9 3


ART. 58(4) EUROPOL COUNCIL DECISION


p.m.


8 564 610


8 564 610




 



Title 9 — Total




80 068 150




12 754 958




92 823 108





 



GRAND TOTAL




80 068 150




12 754 958




92 823 108





EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


45 422 000


3 926 910


49 348 910




 



Title 1 — Total




48 143 000




3 926 910




52 069 910






2






OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





2 6


ART. 58(4) EUROPOL COUNCIL DECISION


p.m.


8 564 610


8 564 610




 



Title 2 — Total




12 090 000




8 564 610




20 654 610






3






OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES





3 6


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO SUBSIDIES AND GRANTS


p.m.


263 438


263 438




 



Title 3 — Total




19 835 150




263 438




20 098 588





 



GRAND TOTAL




80 068 150




12 754 958




92 823 108
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010171EN.01000501.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

29 June 2010
2010/C 171/06

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2198




JPY


Japanese yen


108,31




DKK


Danish krone


7,4486




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81040




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5241




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3258




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9085




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,753




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


286,76




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7093




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1603




RON


Romanian leu


4,3738




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9303




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4250




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2812




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4958




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7579




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7075




KRW


South Korean won


1 484,96




ZAR


South African rand


9,3180




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2918




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,1973




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 052,67




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9692




PHP


Philippine peso


56,609




RUB


Russian rouble


38,1300




THB


Thai baht


39,564




BRL


Brazilian real


2,1946




MXN


Mexican peso


15,6591




INR


Indian rupee


56,7020






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-361/09: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Centraal bureau voor de statistiek v Commission
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU financing, Netherlands, action for annulment, agricultural statistics, agricultural structure, payment, redemption








C_2010234EN.01005403.xml










28.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/54





Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Centraal bureau voor de statistiek v Commission
(Case T-361/09) (1)

()
2010/C 234/97
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5876 — Turmed/RACC/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, financial services, merger control, motor car, sport, tourism, travel agency








C_2010171EN.01001501.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/15





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5876 — Turmed/RACC/JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 171/10






1.


On 22 June 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Turmed S L (‘Turmed’, Spain) which operates under the commercial name Orizonia and is jointly controlled by The Carlyle Group (USA) and Vista Desarrollo SA (‘Vista Desarrollo’, Spain), and Real Automovil Club de Catalunya (‘RACC’, Spain) acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, joint control of a newly created joint venture (‘JV’), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Turmed: provision of tourist services through wholesale and retail travel agencies, flights, hotels and Internet sales,










—


The Carlyle Group: investment group active in various sectors such as aerospace and defense, transport, energy, real estate and financial services,










—


Vista Desarrollo: investment fund which holds temporary participations in non-financial activities,










—


RACC: Spanish automobile club active in the provision of services to its members (including travel agencies), sports activities and the defence of motorists' rights,










—


for the JV: provision of tourist services in Spain.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5876 — Turmed/RACC/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2010 ( OJ C 86, 31.3.2010 )
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
Subjects: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, expenditure, financial year, personnel administration, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010173EN.01002701.xml










30.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/27





Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2010

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 86 of 31 March 2010
)

On page 41, column ‘Appropriations 2010’ of the table, the figures for Chapter 3 3 should read ‘1 583 002’, ‘Title 3 — Total’ should read ‘7 913 697’ and ‘GRAND TOTAL’ should read ‘14 789 797’.
Case C-314/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal De Première Instance, Liège (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2010 — Hubert Pagnoul v Belgian State — SPF Finances
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, application of EU law, interpretation of the law, primacy of EU law








C_2010246EN.01002402.xml










11.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/24





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal De Première Instance, Liège (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2010 — Hubert Pagnoul v Belgian State — SPF Finances
(Case C-314/10)
()
2010/C 246/42
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal De Première Instance, Liège

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Hubert Pagnoul

Defendant: Belgian State — SPF Finances

Question referred

Does Article 6 of Title I, ‘Common Provisions’, of the Treaty of Lisbon of 13 December 2007 amending the Treaty on European Union, signed at Maastricht on 7 February 1992, in force since 1 December 2009 (substantially reproducing the provisions previously contained in Article 6 of Title I of the Treaty on European Union signed at Maastricht on 7 February 1992, which itself entered into force on 1 November 1993) and Article 234 (formerly 177) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty) of 25 March 1957, on the one hand, and/or Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000, on the other hand, preclude a national Law, such as that of 12 July 2009 amending Article 26 of the Special Law of 6 January 1989 on the Cour d’Arbitrage, (1) from requiring prior recourse to the Cour Constitutionnelle by a national court which finds that a taxpaying citizen is deprived of the effective judicial protection guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as incorporated in Community law, by another national Law, namely Article 49 of the Programmatic Law of 9 July 2004, without that court being able immediately to ensure the direct applicability of Community law to the dispute before it or being able to scrutinise compliance with that convention when the Cour Constitutionnelle has recognised the compatibility of the national law with the fundamental rights guaranteed by Title II of the Constitution?


(1)  Moniteur belge, 31 July 2009, p. 51617.
Case F-30/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2010 — Hanot v Commission
Date: 2010-06-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, appointment of staff, competition (EU), personnel administration, professional career








C_2010288EN.01007601.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/76






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2010 — Hanot v Commission
(Case F-30/06) (1)

()
(2010/C 288/144)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006, p. 50.