do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-34/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Sluiter v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01006801.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/68






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Sluiter v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-34/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/126)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Rudolf Sluiter (Hillegom, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer him a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Mr Sluiter a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 25
Case T-178/06: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Bavaria v Council
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Council of the European Union, Germany, action brought before an administrative court, beer, designation of origin, indemnification, location of production, trade-mark law








C_2010234EN.01005301.xml










28.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/53





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Bavaria v Council
(Case T-178/06) (1)

()
2010/C 234/93
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.
Case F-36/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Armitage-Wilson v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01006901.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/69






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Armitage-Wilson v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-36/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/128)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Kate Armitage-Wilson (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by W. J. Dammingh, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by- D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Armitage-Wilson a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 26
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5855 — Deutsche Bahn/Arriva)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: bus, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, provision of services, rail transport, transport of patients








C_2010169EN.01000601.xml










29.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 169/6





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5855 — Deutsche Bahn/Arriva)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 169/05






1.


On 22 June 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bahn AG (‘DB’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Arriva plc (‘Arriva’, United Kingdom) by way of public bid.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for DB: active in several Member states in, inter alia, passenger transport by rail and bus, the operation of railway infrastructure and stations, freight forwarding and logistics (including freight transport) and ancillary services,










—


for Arriva: active in several member States in transport services including bus, train, commuter coach, water bus and airport related transport services, as well as bus and coach distribution.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5855 — Deutsche Bahn/Arriva, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Case F-42/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Esneau-Kappé v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01007102.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/71






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Esneau-Kappé v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-42/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/133)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Anne Esneau-Kappé (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Esneau-Kappé a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 180, of 01.08.09., p 63
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5792 — Robert Bosch/Deutz/Eberspächer)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2010169EN.01000101.xml










29.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 169/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5792 — Robert Bosch/Deutz/Eberspächer)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 169/01
On 7 April 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5792. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case F-38/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Martin v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01007001.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/70






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Martin v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-38/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/130)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Breige Martin (Dublin, Ireland) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Martin a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 26
Case T-515/08: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Mauerhofer v Commission (Multiple framework contract ‘Commission 2007’ — Recruitment of experts in the context of actions relating to aid granted to non-member countries — Tasks requiring expertise — Commission measure relating to the number of billable days’ work — Action for annulment — No challengeable act — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, European Commission, action for annulment (EU), contractual liability, damage, damages








C_2010221EN.01004401.xml










14.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/44





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Mauerhofer v Commission
(Case T-515/08) (1)

(Multiple framework contract ‘Commission 2007’ - Recruitment of experts in the context of actions relating to aid granted to non-member countries - Tasks requiring expertise - Commission measure relating to the number of billable days’ work - Action for annulment - No challengeable act - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2010/C 221/72
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Volker Mauerhofer (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J. Schartmüller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent)

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of the Commission’s administrative order of 9 September 2008 amending specific contract 2007/146271, which had been concluded between the Commission and the framework contractor for the project ‘Value Chain Mapping Analysis’ carried out in Bosnia and Herzegovina, by reducing the number of days’ work carried out by the applicant — under a contract between him and the framework contractor — for which the framework contractor could bill the Commission, and second, the award of damages

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Volker Mauerhofer shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.
Case F-44/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Knöll v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, employment policy, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01007201.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/72






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Knöll v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-44/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/134)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Brigitte Knöll (Hochheim am Main, Germany) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Knöll a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 180, of 01.08.09., p 64
Case F-37/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Doyle v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment, fine, operation of the Institutions








C_2010288EN.01006902.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/69






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Doyle v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-37/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)
(2010/C 288/129)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Margaret Doyle (Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Doyle a contract of indefinite duration;










2.


orders Europol to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 26
Case C-311/10: Action brought on 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Poland, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, commercial vehicle, motor vehicle, technical regulations, vehicle parts








C_2010246EN.01002401.xml










11.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/24





Action brought on 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-311/10)
()
2010/C 246/41
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos and Ł. Habiak, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by failing to adopt all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive), (1) or, in any event, by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;










—


order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2007/46 had to be transposed expired on 29 April 2009.


(1)  OJ 2007 L 263, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010169EN.01000201.xml










29.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 169/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2010
2010/C 169/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2339




JPY


Japanese yen


110,25




DKK


Danish krone


7,4443




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82000




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5584




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3387




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9370




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,745




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


285,02




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7088




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1322




RON


Romanian leu


4,3405




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9403




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4119




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2757




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,6031




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7407




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7119




KRW


South Korean won


1 482,97




ZAR


South African rand


9,3356




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3864




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,1950




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 142,60




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9744




PHP


Philippine peso


57,240




RUB


Russian rouble


38,2615




THB


Thai baht


39,941




BRL


Brazilian real


2,1928




MXN


Mexican peso


15,6027




INR


Indian rupee


57,0120






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-11/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Palou Martínez v Commission (Public service — Officials — Manifestly inadmissible — Delay — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment, job mobility








C_2010288EN.01007301.xml










23.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/73






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Palou Martínez v Commission
(Case F-11/10)
(Public service - Officials - Manifestly inadmissible - Delay - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure)
(2010/C 288/137)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: María Soledad Palou Martínez (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: V. Balfagon Costa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application to annul the decision to reassign the applicant to headquarters in Brussels.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Ms Palou Martínez is ordered to bear her own costs.
Case C-441/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Alrosa Company Ltd (Appeals — Dominant position — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — World market in rough diamonds — Individual commitments by a company to cease purchasing rough diamonds from another company — Decision making a company’s individual commitments binding and terminating the proceedings)
Date: 2010-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, interpretation of the law, judicial proceedings, precious stones, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_2010234EN.01000301.xml










28.8.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/3





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Alrosa Company Ltd
(Case C-441/07 P) (1)

(Appeals - Dominant position - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - World market in rough diamonds - Individual commitments by a company to cease purchasing rough diamonds from another company - Decision making a company’s individual commitments binding and terminating the proceedings)
2010/C 234/03
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and R. Sauer, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Alrosa Company Ltd (represented by: R. Subiotto QC, K. Jones, solicitor-advocate, and S. Mobley, solicitor)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 July 2007 in Case T-170/06 Alrosa v Commission, annulling Decision 2006/520/EC of 22 February 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 82 EC and 54 EEA (Case COMP/B-2/38.381 — De Beers), making binding the commitments given by De Beers to bring to an end its purchases of rough diamonds from Alrosa with effect from 2009, after a period of progressive reduction of the amounts purchased by it from 2006 to 2008, and bringing the proceedings to an end in accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 11 July 2007 in Case T-170/06 Alrosa v Commission;










2.


Dismisses the action brought by Alrosa Company Ltd before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;










3.


Orders Alrosa Company Ltd to pay the costs both of the appeal and of the proceedings at first instance.






(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.