do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-275/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 2 June 2010 — Residex Capital IV CV v Gemeente Rotterdam
Date: 2010-06-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: credit guarantee, interpretation of the law, loan








C_2010246EN.01001801.xml










11.9.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/18





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 2 June 2010 — Residex Capital IV CV v Gemeente Rotterdam
(Case C-275/10)
()
2010/C 246/30
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Residex Capital IV CV

Defendant: Gemeente Rotterdam

Question referred

Does the provision in the last sentence of Article 88(3) EC, now Article 108(3) TFEU, mean that, in a case such as the present, where the unlawful aid measure was implemented by granting the lender a guarantee which enabled the borrower to obtain a loan from the lender which would not have been available to it under normal market conditions, the national courts, within the framework of their obligation to remedy the consequences of the unlawful aid measure, are obliged, or at any rate authorised to cancel the guarantee, even if that does not result in the cancellation of the loan granted under the guarantee?