do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-225/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Claro v OHIM — Telefónica (Claro) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community three-dimensional mark Claro — Earlier Community word mark CLARO — Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Articles 59 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 60 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), mobile phone, telecommunications industry, telephone, trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01003001.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/30





Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Claro v OHIM — Telefónica (Claro)
(Case T-225/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community three-dimensional mark Claro - Earlier Community word mark CLARO - Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal - Articles 59 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 60 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
2010/C 148/53
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Claro, SA (São Paulo, Brazil) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Telefónica SA (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2009 (Case R 1079/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Telefónica, SA and BCP S/A

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Claro, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 367/2010 of 28 April 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2010107EN.01001501.xml










29.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 107/15








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 367/2010
of 28 April 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 April 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 April 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


98,8 




MA 


92,8 




TN 


108,1 




TR 


95,1 




ZZ 


98,7 




0707 00 05 


MA 


80,4 




TR 


118,2 




ZZ 


99,3 




0709 90 70 


MA 


86,8 




TR 


87,5 




ZZ 


87,2 




0805 10 20 


EG 


47,9 




IL 


57,8 




MA 


45,8 




TN 


61,8 




TR 


51,6 




ZZ 


53,0 




0805 50 10 


IL 


58,2 




TR 


69,0 




ZA 


72,5 




ZZ 


66,6 




0808 10 80 


AR 


89,8 




BR 


80,3 




CA 


80,5 




CL 


83,9 




CN 


83,7 




MK 


22,1 




NZ 


104,5 




US 


120,8 




UY 


68,9 




ZA 


83,3 




ZZ 


81,8 




0808 20 50 


AR 


87,5 




CL 


104,8 




CN 


96,0 




NZ 


167,4 




ZA 


90,4 




ZZ 


109,2 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010108EN.01000501.xml










28.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

27 April 2010
2010/C 108/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3290




JPY


Japanese yen


124,70




DKK


Danish krone


7,4422




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86705




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5770




CHF


Swiss franc


1,4353




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8440




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,514




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


266,75




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7080




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9166




RON


Romanian leu


4,1280




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9779




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4395




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3340




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,3178




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8454




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8205




KRW


South Korean won


1 475,19




ZAR


South African rand


9,8276




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,0715




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2508




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 970,34




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2362




PHP


Philippine peso


59,038




RUB


Russian rouble


38,7900




THB


Thai baht


42,854




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3278




MXN


Mexican peso


16,2064




INR


Indian rupee


59,0670






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5650 — T-Mobile/Orange) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: communications systems, economic concentration, merger control, mobile phone, provision of services, telecommunications








C_2010108EN.01000401.xml










28.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5650 — T-Mobile/Orange)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 108/03
On 1 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5650. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Joined Cases T-456/05 and T-457/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Gütermann and Zwicky v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Actual impact on the market — Duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, iron and steel industry, unlawful agreement, wire








C_2010148EN.01002502.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/25





Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Gütermann and Zwicky v Commission
(Joined Cases T-456/05 and T-457/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market in industrial thread - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Actual impact on the market - Duration of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Proportionality - Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
2010/C 148/44
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Gütermann AG (Gutach-Breisgau, Germany) (Case T-456/05); and Zwicky & Co. AG (Wallisellen, Switzerland) (Case T-457/05) (represented by: J. Burrichter, B. Kasten and S. Orlikowski-Wolf, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, M. Schneider and K. Mojzesowicz, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 3452 of 14 September 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.337 — PO/Thread), as amended by Commission Decision C(2005) 3765 of 13 October 2005 and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions;










2.


Orders Gütermann AG et Zwicky & Co. AG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.
Case F-25/10: Action brought on 28 April 2010 — AG (*) v Parliament
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action for annulment (EU), dismissal, servant (EU)




C_2010161EN.01005803.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/58






Action brought on 28 April 2010 — AG (*1) v Parliament
(Case F-25/10)
(2010/C 161/95)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AG (*1) (represented by: S. Rodriguez and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period and compensation for the loss suffered.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the dismissal decision of 14 May 2009, together with the decision of 21 December 2009 rejecting the complaint;










—


Indicate to the Appointing Authority the effects which the annulment of the contested decisions entail and, in particular, the possibility of a second probationary period or an extension of the probationary period, after which a new assessment of her performance would be carried out;










—


Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.






(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of data and/or confidentiality.
Case T-446/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Amann & Söhne and Cousin Filterie v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Concept of a single infringement — Definition of the market — Fines — Upper limit for the fine — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, iron and steel industry, unlawful agreement, wire








C_2010148EN.01002401.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/24





Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Amann & Söhne and Cousin Filterie v Commission
(Case T-446/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market in industrial thread - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Concept of a single infringement - Definition of the market - Fines - Upper limit for the fine - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Rights of the defence - Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
2010/C 148/41
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Amann & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG (Bönnigheim, Germany) and Cousin Filterie SAS (Wervicq-Sud, France) (represented by: A. Röhling, M. Dietrich and C. Horstkotte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents, assisted by G. Eickstädt, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 3452 of 14 September 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.337 — PO/Thread), as amended by Commission Decision C(2005) 3765 of 13 October 2005, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Amann & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG and Cousin Filterie SAS to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.
Case T-103/10 P(R)-R: Order of the President of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Parliament v U (Interim measures — Civil Service — Officials — Decision to dismiss — Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union made in proceedings for interim measures — Application to suspend the operation of a measure — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, Luxembourg, civil servant, summary procedure








C_2010179EN.01004002.xml










3.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/40






Order of the President of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Parliament v U
(Case T-103/10 P(R)-R)
(Interim measures - Civil Service - Officials - Decision to dismiss - Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union made in proceedings for interim measures - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - No need to adjudicate)
(2010/C 179/71)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and K. Zejdová, Agents)

Respondent: U (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Re:

Application to suspend the application of the order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 18 December 2009 in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament [2009] ECR I-0000.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures made by the European Parliament.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, processing industry








C_2010108EN.01000101.xml










28.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/1





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 108/01






Date of adoption of the decision


9.11.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 579/09




Member State


Italy




Region


Molise, Toscana, Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


ITTIERRE S.p.A.




Legal basis


Decreto Legislativo 270/1999, «Nuova disciplina dell'amministrazione straordinaria delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza»; decreto-legge 347/2003, «Misure urgenti per la ristrutturazione industriale di grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza», e decreto 319/2004, «Condizioni e le modalità di prestazione della garanzia statale sui finanziamenti a favore delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza».




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


Rescue of firms in difficulty




Form of aid


Guarantee




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 64,2 million




Intensity


100 %




Duration (period)


10.11.2009-10.5.2010




Economic sectors


Manufacturing industry




Name and address of the granting authority


Ministero dello Sviluppo economico




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Case T-448/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Oxley Threads v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in thread for automotive customers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, iron and steel industry, unlawful agreement, wire








C_2010148EN.01002402.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/24





Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Oxley Threads v Commission
(Case T-448/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market in thread for automotive customers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
2010/C 148/42
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Oxley Threads Ltd (Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Peretz, Barrister, M. Rees and K. Vernon, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 3452 of 14 September 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.337 — PO/Thread), as amended by Commission Decision C(2005) 3765 of 13 October 2005 and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Oxley Threads Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.
Case T-452/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — BST v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Non-contractual liability — Disclosure of confidential information — Damage — Causal link)
Date: 2010-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, iron and steel industry, unlawful agreement, wire








C_2010148EN.01002501.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/25





Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — BST v Commission
(Case T-452/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market in industrial thread - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation - Non-contractual liability - Disclosure of confidential information - Damage - Causal link)
2010/C 148/43
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Belgian Sewing Thread (BST) NV (Deerlijk, Belgium) (represented by: H. Gilliams and J. Bocken, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for (i) partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 3452 of 14 September 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.337 — PO/Thread), as amended by Commission Decision C(2005) 3765 of 13 October 2005 and, in the alternative, reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision and (ii) an order that the Commission pay compensation, on the basis of the non-contractual liability of the European Community, for the loss which the applicant has suffered

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Fixes at EUR 856 800 the fine imposed on Belgian Sewing Thread (BST) NV by Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2005) 3452 of 14 September 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.337 — PO/Thread);










2.


For the rest, dismisses the application for annulment;










3.


Dismisses the claim for damages.










4.


Orders BST to bear 90 % of its own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the European Commission, and the European Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by BST.






(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.