do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 303/2010 of 13 April 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2010093EN.01000101.xml










14.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 93/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 303/2010
of 13 April 2010
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 April 2010.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 April 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


92,1 




MA 


107,2 




TN 


120,7 




TR 


109,0 




ZZ 


107,3 




0707 00 05 


MA 


62,1 




TR 


124,4 




ZZ 


93,3 




0709 90 70 


MA 


43,0 




TR 


102,5 




ZZ 


72,8 




0805 10 20 


EG 


51,2 




IL 


51,9 




MA 


52,3 




TN 


46,0 




TR 


61,6 




ZZ 


52,6 




0805 50 10 


EG 


66,0 




IL 


66,2 




TR 


65,6 




ZA 


71,7 




ZZ 


67,4 




0808 10 80 


AR 


83,8 




BR 


85,8 




CA 


80,0 




CL 


84,9 




CN 


80,9 




MK 


22,1 




NZ 


111,7 




US 


134,2 




UY 


72,4 




ZA 


85,5 




ZZ 


84,1 




0808 20 50 


AR 


86,7 




CL 


105,7 




CN 


96,9 




ZA 


100,5 




ZZ 


97,5 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, postal and telecommunications services, regional development








C_2010093EN.01000801.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/8





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/05






Date of adoption of the decision


22.12.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 368/09




Member State


Germany




Region


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Änderung der Breitbandhilferegelung N 115/08 Breitbandversorgung ländlicher Räume in Deutschland




Legal basis


Gesetz über die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes“ (GAK) und GAK Rahmenplan 2010 bis 2013 Grundsätze für die Förderung der integrierten ländlichen Entwicklung, Teil B Breitbandversorgung ländlicher Räume.




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Regional development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Annual budget: EUR 24,8 million; Overall budget: EUR 149 million




Intensity


—




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2013




Economic sectors


Post and telecommunications




Name and address of the granting authority


Fachministerien der Länder




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm






Date of adoption of the decision


8.2.2010




Reference number of State Aid


N 383/09




Member State


Germany




Region


Sachsen




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Änderung der Breitbandbeihilferegelung N 150/08 — Breitbandversorgung ländlicher Räume im Freistaat Sachsen




Legal basis


Haushaltsordnung des Freistaates Sachsen; Richtlinie des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft zur Integrierten Ländlichen Entwicklung im Freistaat Sachsen (Förderrichtlinie Integrierte Ländliche Entwicklung — RL ILE/2007), Teil A 1.4, Gesetz über die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes (GAK) sowie Entwicklungsprogramm für den ländlichen Raum, EPLR




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Regional development




Form of aid


Direct grant, Transactions not on market terms




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 10 million




Intensity


—




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2015




Economic sectors


Post and telecommunications




Name and address of the granting authority


Verschiedene Städte und Landratsämter




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Commission Opinion of 13 April 2010 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd at Trident Park in Cardiff in the United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, health risk, radioactive effluent, radioactive pollution, radioactive waste, storage of waste, waste management








C_2010094EN.01000101.xml










14.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/1





COMMISSION OPINION
of 13 April 2010
relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd at Trident Park in Cardiff in the United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty
(Only the English text is authentic)
2010/C 94/01
On 13 November 2009, the European Commission received from the British Government, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd.
On the basis of these data and additional information requested by the Commission on 30 November 2009 and provided by the British authorities on 4 January 2010, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:






1.


The distances between the facility and the nearest point of another Member State are 210 km for France and 230 km for Ireland.










2.


Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State.










3.


Solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before being transferred to authorised treatment or storage facilities within the United Kingdom.










4.


In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses received in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population.




In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd, located at Trident Park in Cardiff, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

Done at Brussels, 13 April 2010.


For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission
Case T-511/08: Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Unity OSG FZE v Council
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Afghanistan, General Court (EU), civil defence, invitation to tender, provision of services, public contract








C_2010161EN.01005603.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/56






Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Unity OSG FZE v Council
(Case T-511/08) (1)

(2010/C 161/90)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5735 — UTC/GE Security) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, disclosure of information, economic concentration, electronic equipment, goods and services, merger control, new technology, restrictive-practice authorisation, safety device








C_2010093EN.01001402.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/14





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5735 — UTC/GE Security)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/08
On 22 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5735. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5717 — The Stanley Works/The Black & Decker Corporation) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, tool industry








C_2010093EN.01001401.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/14





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5717 — The Stanley Works/The Black & Decker Corporation)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/07
On 12 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5717. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010093EN.01001501.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/15





Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2010
2010/C 93/09

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3585




JPY


Japanese yen


126,99




DKK


Danish krone


7,4430




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88250




SEK


Swedish krona


9,7460




CHF


Swiss franc


1,4393




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,0085




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,165




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


265,21




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7065




PLN


Polish zloty


3,8665




RON


Romanian leu


4,1280




TRY


Turkish lira


2,0198




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4635




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3688




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,5396




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9073




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8898




KRW


South Korean won


1 513,58




ZAR


South African rand


9,8311




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,2727




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2695




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 247,80




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3560




PHP


Philippine peso


60,776




RUB


Russian rouble


39,3946




THB


Thai baht


43,969




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3971




MXN


Mexican peso


16,5968




INR


Indian rupee


60,3010






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-185/10: Action brought on 13 April 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, competition law, import, market approval, pharmaceutical legislation, pharmaceutical product








C_2010209EN.01001102.xml










31.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/11





Action brought on 13 April 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-185/10)
()
2010/C 209/16
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Simerdova and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by adopting and maintaining in force Article 4 of the Usatawa ‘Prawo farmaceutyczne’ (Law on Medicinal Products) of 6 September 2001 as amended by the Law of 30 March 2007 (Dz. U. No 75, heading 492), in so far as that article allows medicinal products imported from abroad having the same active substances, the same dosage and the same form as medicinal products which have obtained marketing authorisation in Poland to be placed on the market in Poland without authorisation issued there if the price of the former medicinal products is competitive in relation to the price of the latter, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use; (1)











—


order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The adoption and application by the Republic of Poland of Article 4(1) and (3a) of the Law on Medicinal Products make it possible for medicinal products to be marketed in Poland when they do not possess a marketing authorisation in Poland issued by the competent national authorities, a situation which is contrary to Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/83.
In the applicant’s submission, the Polish provision is not covered by Article 5(1) and Article 126a of Directive 2001/83, which provide for exceptions to the general requirement contained in Article 6(1) of that directive that medicinal products must have a national authorisation.
Above all, Article 4(3a) of the Law on Medicinal Products, according to which the condition for allowing imported medicinal products is their ‘competitive price’ compared with the price of medicinal products already allowed on the national market, is based exclusively on an economic criterion. A criterion of that kind cannot, however, justify an exception to Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/83. Furthermore, the Polish provision concerns medicinal products with the same active substance, form and dosage as medicinal products already permitted on the national market, and it is therefore not possible to consider them to be unavailable on the national market, a situation which might justify the need for targeted import on the basis of Article 5(1) of the directive.


(1)  OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Poland, State aid, control of State aid, employment aid, regional development








C_2010093EN.01000601.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/6





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/03






Date of adoption of the decision


22.9.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 338/09




Member State


Poland




Region


Zachodniopomorskie




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


UniCredit Process & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce




Legal basis


Projekt umowy ramowej o udzielenie dotacji celowej pomiędzy Ministrem Gospodarki a UniCredit Processes & Administration Socjeta per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce
Projekt uchwały Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienia programu wieloletniego pod nazwą „Wsparcie finansowe inwestycji realizowanej w Szczecinie przez UniCredit Processes & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce, pod nazwą: Centrum Ekspertyz dla krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w ramach centrum usług wspólnych w latach 2009–2011”
Artykuł 117 Ustawy z dnia 30 czerwca 2005 r. o finansach publicznych




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


Regional development, Employment




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: PLN 2,707 million




Intensity


7,32 %




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2017




Economic sectors


Service activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Minister Gospodarki




Plac Trzech Krzyży 3/5




00-507 Warszawa




POLSKA/POLAND








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Case T-103/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa — Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), clothing industry, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather industry, trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01002601.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/26





Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa)
(Case T-103/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa - Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 148/45
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Esotrade SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. de Rivera Lamo de Espinosa and J.E. Astiz Suárez, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Antonio Segura Sánchez (Alicante, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 (Case R 217/2004-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Antonio Segura Sánchez and Esotrade SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the applicant to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Poland, State aid, control of State aid, cultural promotion, heritage protection, regional development








C_2010093EN.01000701.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/7





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/04






Date of adoption of the decision


19.11.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 470/08




Member State


Poland




Region


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Pomoc na działania rewitalizacyjne




Legal basis


Artykuł 21 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 6 grudnia 2006 r. o zasadach prowadzenia polityki rozwoju




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Regional development, Culture, Heritage conservation




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: EUR 500 million




Intensity


75 %




Duration (period)


Until 2013




Economic sectors


All sectors




Name and address of the granting authority


Instytucje Zarządzające RPO, czyli 16 Zarządów Województw




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2010-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, State aid, aid to undertakings, catering industry, control of State aid, hotel industry, tourism








C_2010093EN.01000501.xml










13.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/5





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 93/02






Date of adoption of the decision


13.7.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 179/09




Member State


Austria




Region


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Barwertberechnungsmethode für Haftungen in der Tourismus- und Freizeitwirtschaft




Legal basis


—




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Small and medium-sized enterprises




Form of aid


Guarantee




Budget


—




Intensity


—




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2010




Economic sectors


Hotels and restaurants (tourism)




Name and address of the granting authority







Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit




Abteilung V/4 (Tourismus-Förderungen)




Stubenring 1




1011 Wien




ÖSTERREICH








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm