do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-164/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emanuele Ferazzoli v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01002901.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/29






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emanuele Ferazzoli v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-164/10)
(2010/C 161/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Emanuele Ferazzoli

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-167/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Palomba v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003002.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/30






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Palomba v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-167/10)
(2010/C 161/41)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Andrea Palomba

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-171/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Sacripanti v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003201.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/32






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Sacripanti v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-171/10)
(2010/C 161/45)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Andrea Sacripanti

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-174/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Paola Tonachella v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003301.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/33






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Paola Tonachella v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-174/10)
(2010/C 161/48)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Paola Tonachella

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-170/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Mirko De Filippo v Ministero dell'Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003102.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/31






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Mirko De Filippo v Ministero dell'Interno
(Case C-170/10)
(2010/C 161/44)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Mirko De Filippo

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-168/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Michele Fanelli v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003003.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/30






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Michele Fanelli v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-168/10)
(2010/C 161/42)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Michele Fanelli

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-157/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. v Administración General del Estado
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, corporation tax, double taxation, interpretation of the law, tax relief








C_2010179EN.01001601.xml










3.7.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/16






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. v Administración General del Estado
(Case C-157/10)
(2010/C 179/26)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.

Defendant: Administración General del Estado

Question referred

Must Articles 63 and 65 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that they preclude national rules (enacted unilaterally or under a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation) which, in the context of corporation tax and within the framework of provisions for the avoidance of such double taxation, prohibit the deduction of amounts of tax due in other Member States of the European Union on income subject to corporation tax and obtained in their territory where those amounts, though due, are not paid by virtue of an exemption, a credit or any other tax benefit?
Case C-173/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Fabrizio Cariulo v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003203.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/32






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Fabrizio Cariulo v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-173/10)
(2010/C 161/47)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Fabrizio Cariulo

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case T-154/10: Action brought on 2 April 2010 — France v European Commission
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, State aid, action for annulment (EU), control of State aid, postal and telecommunications services








C_2010161EN.01004302.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/43






Action brought on 2 April 2010 — France v European Commission
(Case T-154/10)
(2010/C 161/69)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, B. Beaupère-Manokha and J. Gstalter, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Annul in its entirety the contested decision;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 133 Final of 26 January 2010 declaring the implicit unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste under the provisions of French law concerning the legal consequences of its status as a legal entity governed by public law, the equivalent of a State-owned industrial and commercial establishment, to be State aid incompatible with the Common Market (State aid No C 56/2007 (formerly E 15/2005)).
In support of its action, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law alleging:






—


error of law in that the Commission did not establish to the requisite legal standard the existence of State aid. The Commission failed to comply with the evidential rules relating to State aid with regard both to the burden of proof and the standard of proof;










—


errors in fact and in law in that the Commission found the existence of an implicit unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste;










—


error in applying the concept of advantage within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. First, the Commission erred in concluding that a guarantee created an advantage in favour of La Poste and, secondly, the Commission erred in considering that La Poste’s positive rating was a result of the existence of the alleged guarantee.
Case C-169/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Sandra Castronovo v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003101.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/31






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Sandra Castronovo v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-169/10)
(2010/C 161/43)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sandra Castronovo

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-176/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Danilo Spina v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003401.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/34






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Danilo Spina v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-176/10)
(2010/C 161/50)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Danilo Spina

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-163/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Isernia (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, defamation, interpretation of the law, parliamentary immunity








C_2010161EN.01002802.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/28






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Isernia (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello
(Case C-163/10)
(2010/C 161/37)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Isernia

Party to the main proceedings

Aldo Patriciello

Question referred

Do the facts construed in abstracto as a criminal offence committed by Aldo Patriciello — a Member of the European Parliament, described in the indictment and in favour of whom the European Parliament adopted a decision on 5 May 2009 to support a defence of immunity — which is categorised as slander under Article 368 of the Penal Code correspond to the expression of an opinion in the performance of parliamentary duties for the purposes of Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities?
Case C-172/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emiliano Orru' v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003202.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/32






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emiliano Orru' v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-172/10)
(2010/C 161/46)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Emiliano Orru’

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?
Case C-175/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Pietro Calogero v Ministero dell’Interno
Date: 2010-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, distributive trades, exclusive distribution agreement, interpretation of the law, liberalisation of the market, restriction on competition








C_2010161EN.01003302.xml










19.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/33






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Pietro Calogero v Ministero dell’Interno
(Case C-175/10)
(2010/C 161/49)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pietro Calogero

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:






(a)


tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;










(b)


in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);










(c)


provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?