do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010082EN.01002501.xml










30.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/25





Euro exchange rates (1)

29 March 2010
2010/C 82/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3471




JPY


Japanese yen


124,75




DKK


Danish krone


7,4419




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89940




SEK


Swedish krona


9,7760




CHF


Swiss franc


1,4329




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,0670




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,453




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


266,00




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7080




PLN


Polish zloty


3,8916




RON


Romanian leu


4,0682




TRY


Turkish lira


2,0641




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4734




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3750




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4596




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8991




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8845




KRW


South Korean won


1 529,64




ZAR


South African rand


9,9803




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,1958




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2627




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 240,18




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4003




PHP


Philippine peso


61,029




RUB


Russian rouble


39,8145




THB


Thai baht


43,589




BRL


Brazilian real


2,4401




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7633




INR


Indian rupee


60,5100






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-147/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Meda Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL)
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), pharmaceutical product, trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01004002.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/40





Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Meda Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL)
(Case T-147/10)
2010/C 148/68
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Homburg, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Nycomed GmbH (Konstanz, Germany)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 29 September 2009 in Case R 697/2007-4 concerning the opposition filed on the basis of German mark No 1 042 583‘ALLERGODIL’ against application No 4 066 452 for the Community trade mark ‘ALLERNIL’;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Nycomed GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ALLERNIL’ for goods in Class 5

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark No 1 042 583‘ALLERGODIL’ for goods in Class 5

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since the trade mark law principles of likelihood of confusion were not correctly applied










—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 due to breach of the duty to give reasons






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5762 — InnoLux/Chi Mei/TPO) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, economic concentration, merger control, new technology, restrictive-practice authorisation, screen, telecommunications equipment








C_2010082EN.01002401.xml










30.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/24





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5762 — InnoLux/Chi Mei/TPO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 82/03
On 25 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5762. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-143/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), electronics industry, trade-mark law








C_2010134EN.01004801.xml










22.5.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/48





Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)
(Case T-143/10)
2010/C 134/78
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ben Ri Electrónica SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sacopa SAU (Sant Jaume de Llierca (Girona), Spain)

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM and reject Community mark No 4 520 193;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Sacopa SAU

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark which contains the word element ‘LT’ (Application No 4 520 193) for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The Applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark (No 13 375) and Spanish figurative marks (Nos 1 719 729 and 1 719 730) composed of the juxtaposition of and ‘L’ and a ‘T’ superimposed on a circle for goods in Classes 9 and 11.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partial rejection of the opposition.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5721 — Otto/Primondo Assets) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, distance selling, distribution business, economic concentration, financial services, merger control, provision of services, restrictive-practice authorisation, retail selling, wholesale trade








C_2010082EN.01002402.xml










30.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/24





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5721 — Otto/Primondo Assets)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 82/04
On 16 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5721. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-152/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), clothing industry, cosmetic product, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather, trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01004401.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/44





Action brought on 30 March 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM
(Case T-152/10)
2010/C 148/73
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: El Corte Inglés SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Rivas Zurdo, M. López Camba and E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Azzedine Alaïa (Paris, France)

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM;










—


order the party or parties which oppose this action to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ALIA’ (application No 3 788 999) for goods in Classes 3, 14, 18 and 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The French company Azzedine Alaïa.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International word mark ‘ALAÏA’ (No 773 126) for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25, Community figurative mark which contains the verbal element ‘ALAÏA’ (No 3 485 166), for goods and services in Classes 16, 20 and 25, and the earlier unregistered mark ‘ALAÏA’ for the manufacture, sale of clothing, articles for women and fashion accessories.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.
Judgement of the Court of 30 March 2010 in Case E-6/09 — Magasin- og Ukepresseforeningen v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Action for failure to act — State aid — Existing aid — Admissibility)
Date: 2010-03-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EFTA Court, EU law - national law, European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, control of State aid, supervisory body








C_2010305EN.01001701.xml










11.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/17





JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT
of 30 March 2010
in Case E-6/09
Magasin- og Ukepresseforeningen v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for failure to act — State aid — Existing aid — Admissibility)

2010/C 305/10
In Case E-6/09, Magasin- og Ukepresseforeningen v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for a declaration that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has failed to act on the complaint lodged with the Authority in August 2006 concerning State aid to newspapers, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Thorgeir Örlygsson and Henrik Bull, Judges, gave judgment on 30 March 2010, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


dismisses the application as inadmissible;










2.


orders the Applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Defendant.