do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, designation of origin, disclosure of information, location of production, originating product, product designation, wine








C_2010077EN.01001701.xml










26.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/17





Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
2010/C 77/09
According to Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 (1), an application for recognition of a traditional term shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, Series C, in order to inform third parties of the existence of such an application, with the view of possibly objecting to the recognition and protection of the traditional term applied for.

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009







Date of receipt


1.3.2010




Number of pages


11




Language of the application


English




File number


TDT-CZ-N0008




Applicant: 







Competent authority of the Member State


:







CZ-Ministry of Agriculture




Simona Hrabetova




Plant Commodities Dept.




Unit for Wine




Těšnov 17




117 05 Prague 1




ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA




Tel. +420 221812354




Fax +420 221812367




simona.hrabetova@mze.cz








Denomination: CHÂTEAU
Traditional term under Article 118u(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
Language: 






—


Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009




List of protected designations of origin or geographical indications concerned: 






—


All Czech protected designation of origin listed in the Register




Grapevine products categories: 






—


Wine (Annex XIb of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007)




Definition: 






—


Historical expression related to a type of area and to a type of wine and reserved to wines coming from an estate which really exists or which is called exactly by this word.






(1)  OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60.
Case T-527/08: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Commission v TMT Pragma
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), management accounting, redemption, research and development, research body, research programme, research project








C_2010148EN.01005103.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/51





Order of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Commission v TMT Pragma
(Case T-527/08) (1)

2010/C 148/85

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010077EN.01000201.xml










26.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

25 March 2010
2010/C 77/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3356




JPY


Japanese yen


123,44




DKK


Danish krone


7,4417




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89440




SEK


Swedish krona


9,6650




CHF


Swiss franc


1,4280




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,0770




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,363




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


263,73




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7074




PLN


Polish zloty


3,8880




RON


Romanian leu


4,0633




TRY


Turkish lira


2,0545




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4619




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3590




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,3662




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8817




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8765




KRW


South Korean won


1 525,82




ZAR


South African rand


9,8925




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,1183




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2630




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 173,12




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4302




PHP


Philippine peso


60,906




RUB


Russian rouble


39,5415




THB


Thai baht


43,260




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3952




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7264




INR


Indian rupee


60,7700






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-139/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL)
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01003901.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/39





Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL)
(Case T-139/10)
2010/C 148/65
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant(s): Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 January 2010 in case R 1134/2009-4; and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “REFLUXCONTROL” for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts of this case; in the alternative, infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.
Case F-96/09: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, European Commission, action by staff, competition (EU), legal profession, linguistics








C_2010148EN.01005401.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/54





Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission
(Case F-96/09)
2010/C 148/95
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Eva Cuallado Martorell (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Díez Lorenzo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to admit the applicant to the oral test of Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 and to deny access to the corrected written tests and annulment with retroactive effect of the reserve list published for the appointment of Lawyer linguists having Spanish as their main language.

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of 14 September 2009 by which EPSO refused to send the applicant a copy of her written tests and an individual assessment sheet, in which were indicated the grounds which caused the selection board to award her the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the final written test (c), and disregarded her application for admission to the oral test of Open Competition AD/130/08;










—


annul the decision of 23 July 2009 by which EPSO stated that it was maintaining the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the last written test (c) and refused the applicant admission to the oral test of Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list for the appointment of Lawyer linguists having Spanish as their main language;










—


annul the reserve list published following the competition with retroactive effect from the date of publication thereof;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-150/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA)
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, Internet site, action for annulment (EU), clothing industry, trade-mark law








C_2010148EN.01004301.xml










5.6.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/43





Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA)
(Case T-150/10)
2010/C 148/71
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Loopia AB (Västeras, Sweden)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 January 2010 in case R 1812/2008-1; and










—


Order the defendant to bear the costs, including those related to the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “LOOPIA”, for services in class 42

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registrations of the word mark “LOOP”, for goods and services in classes 9, 38 an 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark “LOOP”, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 38 ad 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark “LOOPY”, for goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision, rejected the opposition and allowed the application

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 26 March 2010 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/38.344 (1) — Prestressing Steel
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: administrative offence, restriction on competition, restrictive-practice notification, steel








C_2011339EN.01000301.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/3





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 26 March 2010 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/38.344 (1) — Prestressing Steel
2011/C 339/03






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees that the agreements and/or concerted practices constitute one single and continuous infringement for prestressing steel for the time frame in which they existed.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have as object a restriction of competition.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment on the duration of the infringements for each addressee.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's draft decision as regards the conclusion that the agreement between the addressees was capable of having an appreciable effect upon trade between EU Member States and between contracting parties of the EEA.










6.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's draft decision as regards the addressees of the decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned.










7.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, designation of origin, disclosure of information, location of production, originating product, product designation, wine








C_2010077EN.01001601.xml










26.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/16





Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
2010/C 77/08
According to Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 (1), an application for recognition of a traditional term shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, Series C, in order to inform third parties of the existence of such an application, with the view of possibly objecting to the recognition and protection of the traditional term applied for.

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009







Date of receipt


1.3.2010




Number of pages


11




Language of the application


English




File number


TDT-CZ-N0007




Applicant: 






Competent authority of the Member State:







CZ-Ministry of Agriculture




Simona Hrabetova




Plant Commodities Dept.




Unit for Wine




Těšnov 17




117 05 Prague 1




ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA




Tel. +420 221812354




Fax +420 221812367




simona.hrabetova@mze.cz








Denomination: CHATEAU
Traditional term under Article 118u(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
Language: 






—


Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009




List of protected designations of origin or geographical indications concerned: 






—


All Czech protected designation of origin listed in the Register




Grapevine products categories: 






—


Wine (Annex XIb of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007)




Definition: 






—


Historical expression related to a type of area and to a type of wine and reserved to wines coming from an estate which really exists or which is called exactly by this word.






(1)  OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 26 March 2010 in the case of Periscopus AS v Oslo Børs ASA and Erik Must AS (Case E-1/10)
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EFTA Court, European standard, Norway, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, national implementing measure








C_2010320EN.01001901.xml










25.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/19





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 26 March 2010 in the case of Periscopus AS v Oslo Børs ASA and Erik Must AS
(Case E-1/10)
2010/C 320/08
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 26 March 2010 from Oslo tingrett (Oslo District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 31 March 2010, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Periscopus AS v Oslo Børs ASA and Erik Must AS, on the following question:
Is it in accordance with Article 5(4) second subparagraph of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to order an offeror making a public bid to offer a bid price that exceeds the price that the offeror paid or agreed to during the six-month period preceding the time when the obligation to make an offer arose, considering that the market price at the time at which the obligation to make a bid arose is higher than the price that the offeror would otherwise be obliged to offer pursuant to the (Norwegian) Securities Trading Act?
Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, designation of origin, disclosure of information, location of production, product designation, vinification, wine








C_2010077EN.01001501.xml










26.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/15





Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009
2010/C 77/07
According to Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 (1), an application for recognition of a traditional term shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, Series C, in order to inform third parties of the existence of such an application, with the view of possibly objecting to the recognition and protection of the traditional term applied for.

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009







Date of receipt


1.3.2010




Number of pages


11




Language of the application


English




File number


TDT-CZ-N0006




Applicant: 







Competent authority of the Member State


:







CZ-Ministry of Agriculture




Simona Hrabetova




Plant Commodities Dept.




Unit for Wine




Tesnov 17




117 05 Prague 1




ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA




Tel. +420 221812354




Fax +420 221812367




simona.hrabetova@mze.cz








Denomination: CLAIRET
Traditional term under Article 118u(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
Language: 






—


Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009




List of protected designations of origin or geographical indications concerned: 






—


All Czech protected designation of origin listed in the Register




Grapevine products categories: 






—


Wine (Annex XIb of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007)




Definition: 






—


Wine produced from the black grapes without fermentation on skins.






(1)  OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60.
Case T-16/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission (Interim measures — Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries — Call for proposals for the grant of funding — Refusal of funding — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, appeal, developing countries, food price, price increase, summary procedure








C_2010134EN.01003702.xml










22.5.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/37





Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission
(Case T-16/10 R)
(Interim measures - Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries - Call for proposals for the grant of funding - Refusal of funding - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)
2010/C 134/64
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alisei (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and P. van Nuffel, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures relating to the selection of applications for funding submitted under the ‘Facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries’ (EuropeAid/128608/C/ACT/Multi).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-1/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — SNF v ECHA (Proceedings for interim measures — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief — No urgency)
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Chemicals Agency, appeal, dangerous substance, environmental risk prevention, product safety, summary procedure








C_2010134EN.01003602.xml










22.5.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/36





Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — SNF v ECHA
(Case T-1/10 R)
(Proceedings for interim measures - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief - No urgency)
2010/C 134/62
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkila and W. Broere, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision identifying acrylamide as a substance of very high concern stated to have been adopted by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on 7 December 2009 pursuant to Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


Costs are reserved.
2010/223/: Decision of the European Council of 26 March 2010 appointing the Vice-President of the European Central Bank
Date: 2010-03-26
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: European Central Bank, appointment of staff, vice-president of an institution








L_2010099EN.01000701.xml










21.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 99/7








            DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
         
of 26 March 2010
         
appointing the Vice-President of the European Central Bank
(2010/223/EU)


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 283(2) and 139(2)(h) thereof, and having regard to Articles 11.2 and 42.3 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank,


Having regard to the Recommendation of the Council (1),


Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (2),


Having regard to the Opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Vítor CONSTÂNCIO is hereby appointed Vice-President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years.
This appointment takes effect from 1 June 2010.


Article 2
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 26 March 2010.


For the European Council


The President

H. VAN ROMPUY
            





(1)  
            OJ C 52, 2.3.2010, p. 1.

(2)  Opinion delivered on 25 March 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3)  
            OJ C 58, 10.3.2010, p. 3.