do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5689 — Bominflot/SBI Holding) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: diesel fuel, disclosure of information, distributive trades, economic concentration, energy distribution, hydrocarbon, lubricants, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation








C_2010027EN.01000302.xml










3.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5689 — Bominflot/SBI Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 27/03
On 18 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5689. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5711 — RWE/ENSYS) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, distributive trades, economic concentration, electrical energy, insurance, investment company, merger control, natural gas, restrictive-practice authorisation








C_2010027EN.01000401.xml










3.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5711 — RWE/ENSYS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 27/04
On 15 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5711. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Germany, State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, natural disaster, organic farming, silviculture








C_2010027EN.01000101.xml










3.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/1





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
2010/C 27/01






Date of adoption of the decision


15.12.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 438/09




Member State


France




Region


Midi-Pyrénées and Aquitaine




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aides complémentaires au transport et à la rupture de charge de bois des forêts sinistrées par la tempête Klaus du 24 janvier 2009




Legal basis


Article L 2212-1 et L 1511-2 du code général des collectivités territoriales




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Aid to repair damage resulting from natural disasters




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


EUR 7 744 000




Intensity


—




Duration (period)


Until the final payment is made




Economic sectors


Forestry sector




Name and address of the granting authority







Conseil régional d'Aquitaine




14 rue François de Sourdis




33077 Bordeaux




FRANCE









Conseil régional Midi-Pyrénées




22 boulevard du Marechal Juin




31406 Toulouse Cedex 9




FRANCE








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm






Date of adoption of the decision


18.12.2009




Reference number of State Aid


N 571/09




Member State


Germany




Region


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Absatzförderungsmaßnahmen für Erzeugnisse aus ökologischem Landbau (Anmeldung einer Änderung)




Legal basis


Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO) (§§ 23, 44, 91, 100); Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschriften zu §§ 23, 44 BHO; Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG) (§§ 48 bis 49a)




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


The aim of the scheme is to increase consumers’ awareness of organic products through information campaigns and related promotional measures and to inform them in detail about the production, processing, labelling and quality of organic products




Form of aid


Subsidy




Budget


Overall budget EUR 8 million
Annual budget EUR 2 million




Intensity


50 %




Duration (period)


From 1.1.2010 until 31.12.2013




Economic sectors


Agriculture




Name and address of the granting authority







Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE)




Geschäftstelle Bundesprogramm Ökologischer Landbau




Deichmanns Aue 29




53168 Bonn




DEUTSCHLAND








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Case T-472/07: Judgment of the Court of 3 February 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — Hasbro (ENERCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENERCON — Earlier Community word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), energy industry, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2010080EN.01002401.xml










27.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/24





Judgment of the Court of 3 February 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — Hasbro (ENERCON)
(Case T-472/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark ENERCON - Earlier Community word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 80/41
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enercon GmbH (Aurich, Germany) (represented by: R. Böhm and V. Henke, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court: Hasbro Inc. (Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 October 2007 (Case R 959/2006-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Hasbro, Inc. and Enercon GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enercon GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.
Case T-44/10 P: Appeal brought on 3 February 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 November 2009 in Case F-11/09, Marcuccio v Commission
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Civil Service Tribunal, European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), admissibility, health expenditure, interpretation of the law








C_2010080EN.01004302.xml










27.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/43





Appeal brought on 3 February 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 November 2009 in Case F-11/09, Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-44/10 P)
2010/C 80/69
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant







—


In any event, set aside in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal.










—


Declare that the action at first instance, in relation to which the order under appeal was made, was admissible in its entirety and without any exception whatsoever.










—


Allow in its entirety and without any exception whatsoever the relief sought by the appellant at first instance.










—


Order the Commission to reimburse the appellant in respect of all costs, disbursements and fees incurred by him in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal proceedings.










—


In the alternative, refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal, sitting in a different formation, for a fresh decision.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 25 November 2009. That order dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded an action brought against the Commission’s refusal to assume responsibility for 100 % of the appellant’s medical expenses.
In support of his claims, the appellant alleges misinterpretation and misapplication of the principle that reasons must be given for a decision of an institution of the European Union, the concept of additional reasoning for a decision and the legal principles relating to the taking and assessment of evidence.
The appellant also alleges misinterpretation and misapplication of the concepts of a challengeable act and a decision which merely confirms an earlier decision.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 1 February 2010 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, interest








C_2010027EN.01000501.xml










3.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/5





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
1,00 % on 1 February 2010
Euro exchange rates (2)

2 February 2010
2010/C 27/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3937




JPY


Japanese yen


126,20




DKK


Danish krone


7,4454




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87375




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1229




CHF


Swiss franc


1,4733




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1435




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,998




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


270,25




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7087




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9917




RON


Romanian leu


4,0915




TRY


Turkish lira


2,0720




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5815




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4768




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8263




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9706




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,9641




KRW


South Korean won


1 616,23




ZAR


South African rand


10,4002




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,5147




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3180




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 037,03




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7602




PHP


Philippine peso


64,638




RUB


Russian rouble


42,0475




THB


Thai baht


46,187




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5703




MXN


Mexican peso


17,9543




INR


Indian rupee


64,4000






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5742 — Ameropa Holding/Interbrau) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cereals, disclosure of information, economic concentration, fertiliser industry, merger control, metallurgical industry, petrochemicals, restrictive-practice authorisation








C_2010027EN.01000301.xml










3.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5742 — Ameropa Holding/Interbrau)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 27/02
On 19 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5742. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.