do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2010-01-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency, technical specification








C_2010012EN.01000501.xml










19.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 12/5





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2010/C 12/05




National face of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Germany

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: Germany
Subject of commemoration: Bremen
Description of the design: The inner part of the coin features Bremen town hall, with the Bremen Roland statue in the foreground. The word ‘BREMEN’ is inscribed below the town hall on the right. The mint mark, represented by the letter A, D, F, G or J, appears at the top left. The initials of the artist, Bodo Broschat, are at the very bottom, just below the statue.
The name of the issuing country, ‘D’, and the year, ‘2010’, are inserted at the top and bottom of the outer ring of the coin respectively, amid the twelve stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued: 30 million
Date of issue: 


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Joined Cases T-355/04 and T-446/04: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2010 — Co-Frutta v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the Community market for imports of bananas — Implied refusal of access followed by express refusal — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of third parties — Compliance with time-limits — Prior consent of the Member State — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2010-01-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, access to information, action for annulment (EU), common organisation of markets, import, tropical fruit








C_2010051EN.01003001.xml










27.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/30





Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2010 — Co-Frutta v Commission
(Joined Cases T-355/04 and T-446/04) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the Community market for imports of bananas - Implied refusal of access followed by express refusal - Actions for annulment - Admissibility - Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of third parties - Compliance with time-limits - Prior consent of the Member State - Obligation to state reasons)
2010/C 51/57
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Co-Frutta Soc. coop. (Padua, Italy) (represented by: W. Viscardini and G. Donà, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Visaggio and P. Aalto, initially, and P. Aalto and L. Prete, subsequently, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action in Case T-355/04 for annulment of (i) the decision of the Commission of 28 April 2004 rejecting an initial application for access to information concerning operators registered in the Community as importers of bananas and (ii) the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the confirmatory access application and action in Case T-446/04 for annulment of the express decision of the Commission of 10 August 2004 refusing access to the information

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action in Case T-355/04;










2.


Dismisses the action in Case T-446/04;










3.


Orders Co-Frutta Soc. coop. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.
Case T-355/08 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2010 — De Fays v Commission (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Staff case — Officials — Leave — Sick leave — Unauthorised absence established following a medical examination — Deduction from annual leave entitlement — Loss of the benefit of remuneration)
Date: 2010-01-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, regulations for civil servants, sick leave








C_2010051EN.01003102.xml










27.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/31





Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2010 — De Fays v Commission
(Case T-355/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Cross-appeal - Staff case - Officials - Leave - Sick leave - Unauthorised absence established following a medical examination - Deduction from annual leave entitlement - Loss of the benefit of remuneration)
2010/C 51/60
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Chantal De Fays (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 June 2008 in Case F-97/07 De Fays v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal and the cross appeal;










2.


Orders Chantal De Fays to pay the costs of the appeal;










3.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross appeal.






(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.
Case C-30/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Linköpings tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 19 January 2010 — Lotta Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmyndigheten
Date: 2010-01-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Sweden, financial solvency, interpretation of the law, liquidation








C_2010100EN.01001702.xml










17.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 100/17





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Linköpings tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 19 January 2010 — Lotta Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmyndigheten
(Case C-30/10)
2010/C 100/26
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Linköpings tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lotta Andersson

Defendant: Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmyndigheten

Question referred

Is a national provision which excludes an employee from a preferential right on the basis that he, on his own or together with his close relatives, more recently than six months before the application for a declaration of insolvency, was the owner of an essential part of the employer’s undertaking or business and had a considerable influence on its activities compatible with Article 10(c) of Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 (1) amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer? (2)



(1)  OJ L 270, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 283, p. 23.