do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-173/07: Order of the General Court of 11 January 2010 — Reno Schuhcentrum v OHIM — Payless ShoeSource Worldwide (Payless Shoesource)
Date: 2010-01-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), business management, consultancy, footwear industry, trade-mark law








C_2010063EN.01005102.xml










13.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/51





Order of the General Court of 11 January 2010 — Reno Schuhcentrum v OHIM — Payless ShoeSource Worldwide (Payless Shoesource)
(Case T-173/07) (1)

2010/C 63/90

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.
Case C-13/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 11 January 2010 — Knubben Dak-en Leidekkersbedrijf BV v Belgische Staat
Date: 2010-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, freedom to provide services, interpretation of the law, real property, tariff reduction, tax law, tax on income








C_2010080EN.01001402.xml










27.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/14





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 11 January 2010 — Knubben Dak-en Leidekkersbedrijf BV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-13/10)
2010/C 80/25
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Knubben Dak- en Leidekkersbedrijf BV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Questions referred







1.


Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced VAT rate may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992?










2.


Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 EC), preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992 and in the Royal Decree of 26 December 1998, under which registration as a contractor in Belgium applies fully and identically to Belgian service providers and to service providers established in another Member State of the European Union?
Case C-139/09: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
Date: 2010-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, European Commission, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, disclosure of information, fine, national implementing measure, waste management








C_2010063EN.01004405.xml










13.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/44





Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
(Case C-139/09) (1)

2010/C 63/75

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.