do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-513/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Express refusal of an application for reimbursement of 100 % of certain medical expenses incurred by the official — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, action for annulment (EU), health expenditure, ordinance, physician, redemption, social security








C_2010100EN.01001101.xml










17.4.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 100/11





Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission
(Case C-513/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Officials - Social security - Express refusal of an application for reimbursement of 100 % of certain medical expenses incurred by the official - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2010/C 100/16
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (represented by: G. Cipressa, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. dal Ferro, avvocato)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2008 in Case T-143/08 Marcuccio v Commission, by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the application for annulment of the decisions of the Settlements Office of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities refusing to give prior authorisation for 100 % of certain medical expenses incurred by the appellant and to reimburse the cost of a medical consultation in accordance with the rules applicable to consultations of medical experts, and an application that the Commission be ordered to pay certain medical expenses

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Marcuccio to pay the costs of the appeal.






(1)  OJ C 32, of 07.02.2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1203/2009 of 9 December 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2009323EN.01006201.xml










10.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 323/62








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1203/2009
of 9 December 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 December 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 9 December 2009.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


AL 


37,7 




MA 


48,4 




TN 


81,6 




TR 


64,4 




ZZ 


58,0 




0707 00 05 


MA 


52,9 




TR 


78,0 




ZZ 


65,5 




0709 90 70 


MA 


48,2 




TR 


131,1 




ZZ 


89,7 




0805 10 20 


AR 


70,4 




MA 


49,0 




TR 


49,3 




ZA 


57,8 




ZZ 


56,6 




0805 20 10 


MA 


71,9 




ZZ 


71,9 




0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 


CN 


132,8 




HR 


55,6 




IL 


75,3 




TR 


73,7 




ZZ 


84,4 




0805 50 10 


TR 


73,4 




ZZ 


73,4 




0808 10 80 


AU 


161,8 




CA 


65,1 




CN 


81,4 




MK 


24,5 




US 


92,9 




ZZ 


85,1 




0808 20 50 


CN 


45,0 




US 


242,2 




ZZ 


143,6 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-432/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Payment of medical expenses — Implied rejection of the application seeking reimbursement in full of medical expenses incurred by the applicant — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, appeal, health care, health insurance, redemption








C_2010134EN.01000902.xml










22.5.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/9





Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission
(Case C-432/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Officials - Social security - Payment of medical expenses - Implied rejection of the application seeking reimbursement in full of medical expenses incurred by the applicant - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2010/C 134/15
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (represented by: G. Cipressa, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. dal Ferro, avvocato)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 9 July 2008 in Joined Cases T-296/05 and T-408/05 Marcuccio v Commission, by which the Court dismissed as inadmissible the application for annulment of two implied decisions of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities refusing to pay 100 % of certain medical costs incurred by the applicant and an application for an order that the Commission pay to the applicant amounts in respect of certain medical costs

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.






(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.
Case T-1/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2009 — Apache Footwear and Apache II Footwear v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Market economy status — Community interest)
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Council of the European Union, Viet Nam, action for annulment (EU), anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import, originating product








C_2010024EN.01004602.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/46





Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2009 — Apache Footwear and Apache II Footwear v Council
(Case T-1/07) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Market economy status - Community interest)
2010/C 24/80
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Apache Footwear Ltd (Pingsha, China); and Apache II Footwear Ltd (Qingxin) (Taiping Zhen, China) (represented initially by: O. Prost and S. Ballschmiede, and subsequently by O. Prost and E. Berthelot, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and T. Scharf, acting as Agents; Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC), (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by P. Vlaemminck, G. Zonnekeyn and S. Verhulst, and subsequently by P. Vlaemminck and A. Hubert, lawyers); BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio & C. Sas (Monte Urano, Italy) and the 16 other interveners the names of which are listed in the Annex to the judgment, represented by P. Tabellini, G. Celona and C. Cavaliere, lawyers)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ 2006 L 275, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Apache Footwear Ltd and Apache II Footwear Ltd (Qingxin) to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union;










3.


Orders the European Commission, the Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC), BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio & C. Sas and the 16 other interveners the names of which are listed in the Annex to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.
Case T-486/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2009 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (SUPERSKIN) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark SUPERSKIN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2010024EN.01005002.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/50





Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2009 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (SUPERSKIN)
(Case T-486/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark SUPERSKIN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 24/88
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd (Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Cover, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1656/2007-4), concerning registration of the word sign SUPERSKIN as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1656/2007-4), in respect of perfumes, nail and hair care preparations, antiperspirants, deodorants, dentifrice, hair colouring preparations, hair spray, eyecare preparations, nail varnish, nail varnish remover and artificial nails, in Class 3, and hygienic care and cosmetic treatments for the hair, in Class 44;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay half of OHIM’s costs, and OHIM to bear the other half of its costs.






(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5697 — Alstom Holding/Alstom Hydro Holding) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy production, exchange of information, merger control, power plant, provision of services, rail transport, renewable energy








C_2009299EN.01001701.xml










9.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/17





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5697 — Alstom Holding/Alstom Hydro Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 299/07






1.


On 30 November 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Alstom Holdings (‘Alstom’, France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Regulation sole control of the whole of the undertaking Alstom Hydro Holding (‘Alstom Hydro’, France), currently jointly controlled by Alstom and Bouygues SA, by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Alstom: provision of equipment and services for power generation and rail transport,










—


for Alstom Hydro: provision of equipment and services for hydropower plants.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 or 22967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5697 — Alstom Holding/Alstom Hydro Holding, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2009/442/EC of 5 June 2009 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting ( OJ L 148, 11.6.2009 )
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: activity report, data collection, data processing, database, disclosure of information, geographical information system, means of communication, telecommunications








L_2009322EN.01004001.xml










9.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 322/40







Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2009/442/EC of 5 June 2009 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 148 of 11 June 2009
)

On the second page of the cover, at the end of the title of Commission Decision 2009/442/EC, the footnote reference ‘(1)’ is deleted.
On page 18, the sub-title ‘(Text with EEA relevance)’ is deleted.
Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, designation of origin, location of production, mineral water, product designation








C_2009299EN.01002301.xml










9.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/23





Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application
2009/C 299/09
This publication confers the right to object to the cancellation application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. Statements of objections must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.
CANCELLATION REQUEST

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006


Cancellation request according to Article 12(2) and Article 17(2)


‘HÖLLEN SPRUDEL’


EC No: DE-PDO-0117-0860-21.02.2008


PGI ( ) PDO ( X )

1.   Registered name proposed for cancellation:

Höllen Sprudel
2.   Member State or third country:

Germany
3.   Type of product:







Class 2.2.


Natural mineral waters and spring waters




4.   Person or body making request for cancellation:








Name


:


BrunnenVerwaltung Höllensprudel




Address


:







Dr.-Fritz-Wiede-Straße 36




95119 Naila




DEUTSCHLAND








Nature of legitimate interest in making the request:
The requester is acting on behalf of the following proprietor and user of the mineral spring Höllen Sprudel and therefore possesses a legitimate interest in the cancellation request.
5.   Reasons for cancellation:

As proprietor and sole user of the state-recognised mineral spring Höllen Sprudel, Kohlensäurewerk Hölle, Dr. Fritz Wiede GmbH & Co., has, owing to the high inspection costs, no further interest in the protection of this name as a designation of origin under Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (formerly Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92) since it enjoys adequate legal protection under the Mineral- und Tafelwasser Verordnung (Mineral and Table Water Ordinance).
Case C-494/08 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2009 — Prana Haus GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Word mark PRANAHAUS — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part)
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), appeal, printing, trade-mark law








C_2010063EN.01001901.xml










13.3.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/19





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2009 — Prana Haus GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-494/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Word mark PRANAHAUS — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character - Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part)
2010/C 63/28
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Prana Haus GmbH (represented by: N. Hebeis, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndörfer, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 17 September 2008 in Case T-226/07 Prana Haus GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 April 2007 dismissing the appeal against the Examiner's decision to refuse registration of the word mark PRANAHAUS for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 35 — Descriptive character of the mark

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Prana Haus GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009299EN.01000701.xml










9.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 December 2009
2009/C 299/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4774




JPY


Japanese yen


130,74




DKK


Danish krone


7,4416




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90700




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4841




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5111




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4915




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,757




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


273,42




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7077




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1070




RON


Romanian leu


4,2351




TRY


Turkish lira


2,2240




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6247




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5595




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,4504




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0785




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0570




KRW


South Korean won


1 706,88




ZAR


South African rand


11,0849




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


10,0869




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2630




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 045,58




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0150




PHP


Philippine peso


68,045




RUB


Russian rouble


45,0700




THB


Thai baht


49,028




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5792




MXN


Mexican peso


18,8465




INR


Indian rupee


68,7743






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-555/08: Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2009 — IPublish Ganske Interactive Publishing v OHIM (Representation of a navigational device)
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), satellite navigation, trade-mark law








C_2010037EN.01004902.xml










13.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 37/49





Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2009 — IPublish Ganske Interactive Publishing v OHIM (Representation of a navigational device)
(Case T-555/08) (1)

2010/C 37/75

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.
Special report No 14/2009 Have the management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products achieved their main objectives?
Date: 2009-12-09
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Court of Auditors, agricultural market, common organisation of markets, disclosure of information, milk, milk product, report








C_2009299EN.01000801.xml










9.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/8





Special report No 14/2009 ‘Have the management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products achieved their main objectives?’
2009/C 299/04
The European Court of Auditors wishes to inform you that its special report No 14/2009 ‘Have the management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products achieved their main objectives?’ has just been published.
The report can be viewed or downloaded from the website of the European Court of Auditors: http://www.eca.europa.eu
You may obtain a version of the report in hard copy or on CD-ROM by contacting:





European Court of Auditors




Communication and Reports Unit




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu




or by completing an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.