do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-375/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2009 — Scheucher-Fleisch and Others v Commission (State aid — Agriculture — State aid for quality programmes in the agricultural foodstuffs sector in Austria — Decision not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Standing as party concerned — Safeguarding procedural rights — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Guidelines for State aid for advertising)
Date: 2009-11-18
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Austria, European Commission, State aid, action for annulment (EU), administrative procedure, control of State aid, quality label








C_2010011EN.01002101.xml










16.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/21





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2009 — Scheucher-Fleisch and Others v Commission
(Case T-375/04) (1)

(State aid - Agriculture - State aid for quality programmes in the agricultural foodstuffs sector in Austria - Decision not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Standing as party concerned - Safeguarding procedural rights - Admissibility - Serious difficulties - Guidelines for State aid for advertising)
2010/C 11/38
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Scheucher-Fleisch GmbH (Ungerdorf, Austria); Tauernfleisch Vertriebs GmbH (Flattach, Austria); Wech-Kärntner Truthahnverarbeitung GmbH (Glanegg, Austria); Wech-Geflügel GmbH (Sankt Andrä, Austria) and Johann Zsifkovics (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J. Hofer and T. Humer, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 2037 final of 30 June 2004 on State aid NN 34A/2000 concerning the quality programmes and labels AMA-Biozeichen and AMA-Gütesiegel in Austria

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C (2004) 2037 final of 30 June 2004 on State aid NN 34A/2000 concerning the quality programmes and labels AMA Biozeichen and AMA Gütesiegel in Austria;










2.


Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Scheucher-Fleisch GmbH, Tauernfleisch Vertriebs GmbH, Wech-Kärntner Truthahnverarbeitung GmbH, Wech-Geflügel GmbH and Johann Zsifkovics.






(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.
Case C-447/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany), lodged on 18 November 2009 — Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm and Volker Lambach v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Date: 2009-11-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: age discrimination, aircraft, collective agreement, crew, equal treatment, interpretation of the law, labour law








C_2010024EN.01002903.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/29





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany), lodged on 18 November 2009 — Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm and Volker Lambach v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
(Case C-447/09)
2010/C 24/55
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm and Volker Lambach

Respondent: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Question referred

Must Article 2(5), Article 4(1) and/or Article 6(1), first sentence, of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) and/or the general Community-law principle which prohibits discrimination on grounds of age be interpreted as precluding rules of national law which recognise an age-limit of 60 for pilots established by collective agreement for the purposes of ensuring air safety?


(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.