do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2009-11-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Greece, air transport, airline, inland transport, public service, transport regulations








C_2009272EN.01001901.xml










13.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/19





Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 272/08






Member State


Greece




Concerned route








—


Athens–Astypalea










—


Athens–Ikaria










—


Athens–Leros










—


Athens–Milos










—


Thessaloniki–Chios










—


Thessaloniki–Samos










—


Limnos–Mitilini–Chios–Samos–Rhodes










—


Rhodes–Karpathos–Kasos–Sitia










—


Alexandroupolis–Sitia










—


Aktio–Sitia










—


Athens–Kithira










—


Athens–Naxos










—


Athens–Paros










—


Athens–Karpathos










—


Athens–Sitia










—


Athens–Skiathos










—


Thessaloniki–Corfu










—


Rhodes–Kos–Leros–Astypalea










—


Corfu–Aktion–Kefalinia–Zakinthos










—


Athens–Kalymnos










—


Thessaloniki–Kalamata










—


Athens–Skyros










—


Thessaloniki–Skyros










—


Rhodes–Kastelorizo








Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


From the date of the publication of the present notice




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge







Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority




Directorate General for Air Transport




Air Transport and International Affairs Division — Section II




Vas. Georgiou 1




16604 Elliniko




GREECE




Tel. +30 2108916149 or 8916121




Fax +30 2108947132




Website: http://www.hcaa.gr
Case C-443/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza (Italy) lodged on 13 November 2009 — C.C.I.A.A di Cosenza v Grillo Star srl Fallimento
Date: 2009-11-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: company law, indirect tax, interpretation of the law, investment company, tax law, tax on capital








C_2010051EN.01001801.xml










27.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/18





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza (Italy) lodged on 13 November 2009 — C.C.I.A.A di Cosenza v Grillo Star srl Fallimento
(Case C-443/09)
2010/C 51/28
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Camera di commercio, industria, artigianato e agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza

Defendant: Grillo Star srl Fallimento

Questions referred







1.


Are the criteria for determining the annual duty referred to in Article 18[1](b) of Italian Law No 580 of 29 December 1993, as provided for in Article 18(3), (4), (5) and (6) thereof, inconsistent with Council Directive 2008/7/EC (1) of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, in so far as the duty cannot be covered by the exceptions provided for in Article 6[1](e) of that directive?










2.


In particular:






—


Does the annual duty, which is to be determined by reference to ‘the budgetary resources needed in order for the chambers of commerce system to be able to carry out the services which it is under a duty to provide throughout the national territory’, constitute a duty paid by way of fees or dues?










—


Does the provision for a ‘balancing fund’, which is intended to harmonise throughout the national territory the performance of all the ‘administrative functions’ entrusted by law to the chambers of commerce, preclude the possibility that the annual duty is a duty paid by way of fees or dues?










—


Is the power conferred on the individual chambers of commerce to increase the amount of the annual duty by up to 20 % for the purposes of cofinancing initiatives aimed at increasing production and improving the economic conditions of the territorial unit under their responsibility consistent with that annual duty being a duty paid by way of fees or dues?










—


Does the fact that no methods have been specified for determining the total budgetary requirements for the maintaining and the updating by the chambers of commerce of registrations and notes in the register of companies mean that the annual duty cannot be a duty paid by way of fees or dues?










—


Is the fact that the annual duty is determined on a flat-rate basis, with no provision for checking at ‘regular intervals’ that it appropriately reflects the average cost of the service, consistent with the annual duty being a duty paid by way of fees or dues?










(1)  OJ 2008 L 46, p. 11.