do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-11-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009270EN.01001701.xml










11.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/17





Euro exchange rates (1)

10 November 2009
2009/C 270/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4966




JPY


Japanese yen


134,51




DKK


Danish krone


7,4410




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89860




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2850




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5115




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,3835




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,524




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


272,19




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7088




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2033




RON


Romanian leu


4,2979




TRY


Turkish lira


2,2112




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6145




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5852




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,5988




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0224




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0788




KRW


South Korean won


1 739,87




ZAR


South African rand


11,1616




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


10,2170




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2767




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 089,57




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0660




PHP


Philippine peso


70,186




RUB


Russian rouble


43,0194




THB


Thai baht


49,855




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5685




MXN


Mexican peso


19,9557




INR


Indian rupee


69,5170






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-440/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Republic of Poland), lodged on 11 November 2009 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych v Stanisława Tomaszewska
Date: 2009-11-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: free movement of workers, interpretation of the law, pension scheme, social security, transfer of pension rights, wage earner








C_2010037EN.01000202.xml










13.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 37/2





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Republic of Poland), lodged on 11 November 2009 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych v Stanisława Tomaszewska
(Case C-440/09)
2010/C 37/03
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych

Respondent: Stanisława Tomaszewska

Question referred

Is Article 45(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416), in conjunction with Article 15(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1972 (I), p. 159), to be interpreted as meaning that the competent institution of a Member State is required — on establishing that a worker has failed to satisfy the condition of having completed in that Member State a period of insurance which is sufficient under the law of that State for acquisition of entitlement to a retirement pension — to take account of a period of insurance completed in another Member State in such a way that it must recalculate the period of insurance on which acquisition of entitlement depends by applying the rules arising from national law and treating the period completed in the other Member State as a period completed in its own State, or must it add the period completed in the other Member State to the national period calculated previously on the basis of the rules in question?
Case T-452/02 P: Appeal brought on 11 November 2009 by Eckehard Rosenbaum against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 10 September 2009 in Case F-9/08 Rosenbaum v Commission
Date: 2009-11-11
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Civil Service Tribunal, European Commission, action for annulment (EU), equal treatment, personnel administration, professional qualifications








C_2010011EN.01003501.xml










16.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/35





Appeal brought on 11 November 2009 by Eckehard Rosenbaum against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 10 September 2009 in Case F-9/08 Rosenbaum v Commission
(Case T-452/02 P)
2010/C 11/65
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Eckehard Rosenbaum (Bonn, Germany) (represented by H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union

Form of order sought by the appellant







—


set aside the judgment delivered on 10 September 2009 by the Civil Service Tribunal in the case of Rosenbaum v Commission;










—


set aside the Commission’s grading decision of 13 February 2007;










—


require the Commission to grade the appellant in a manner which is non-discriminatory and consistent with his professional experience, and to take all further necessary measures resulting from the judgment;










—


order the Commission to pay all costs relating to the dispute.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal has been brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 September 2009 in Case F-9/08 Rosenbaum v Commission, by which the action brought by the present appellant was dismissed.
In support of his appeal, the appellant first of all submits that the Civil Service Tribunal conducted an incomplete examination of the first plea in law. The Civil Service Tribunal, the appellant continues, also erred in law in rejecting the other three pleas as these, in contrast to the view taken by the Tribunal, were appropriate for the purpose of setting aside the contested measure. In conclusion, the appellant expresses the view that the lack of higher-quality selection procedures has a bearing on the issue of the legality of the contested decision and that the rejection of the evidence adduced in this connection is for that reason unlawful.
Criteria for the assignment of cases to chambers
Date: 2009-11-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Civil Service Tribunal, Court of Justice of the European Union, operation of the Institutions








C_2009270EN.01001901.xml










11.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/19





Criteria for the assignment of cases to chambers
2009/C 270/07
On 7 October 2009, in accordance with Article 4(4) of the Annex to the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 12(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Civil Service Tribunal decided to assign cases, as soon as the application has been lodged, to the First and Second Chambers alternately depending on the order in which they are lodged at the Registry and without prejudice to Articles 13, 14 and 46(2) of the Rules of Procedure.
A number of cases shall be assigned to the Third Chamber, at regular intervals to be determined at a plenary meeting of the Tribunal.
The President of the Tribunal may derogate from the above rules on assignment for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and coherent workload within the Tribunal.
The present decision replaces that of 30 September 2008 (1). It shall enter into force on the day following its publication.


(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 4.
Case C-192/09: Order of the President of the Court of 11 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands
Date: 2009-11-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Netherlands, access to information, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, disclosure of information, electronic mail, information network, transmission network








C_2010051EN.01002807.xml










27.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/28





Order of the President of the Court of 11 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands
(Case C-192/09) (1)

2010/C 51/52

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.