do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 907/2009 of 29 September 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit








L_2009257EN.01000101.xml










30.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 257/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 907/2009
of 29 September 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 September 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 September 2009.


For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MK 


32,8 




ZZ 


32,8 




0707 00 05 


TR 


121,8 




ZZ 


121,8 




0709 90 70 


TR 


110,1 




ZZ 


110,1 




0805 50 10 


AR 


89,6 




CL 


109,9 




TR 


83,3 




UY 


88,0 




ZA 


70,7 




ZZ 


88,3 




0806 10 10 


EG 


109,7 




IL 


111,8 




TR 


102,8 




US 


190,3 




ZZ 


128,7 




0808 10 80 


BR 


83,8 




CL 


83,2 




NZ 


80,0 




US 


83,8 




ZA 


73,1 




ZZ 


80,8 




0808 20 50 


AR 


81,8 




CN 


60,5 




TR 


100,4 




US 


161,5 




ZA 


70,4 




ZZ 


94,9 




0809 30 


TR 


108,0 




ZZ 


108,0 




0809 40 05 


IL 


116,1 




TR 


99,1 




ZZ 


107,6 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case F-102/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures — Award of priority points — Priority points awarded by directors general — Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution — Principle of non-discrimination — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: action by staff, administrator, equal treatment, promotion








C_2010024EN.01007201.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/72





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission
(Case F-102/07) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures - Award of priority points - Priority points awarded by directors general - Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution - Principle of non-discrimination - Duty to state reasons)
2010/C 24/130
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and M. Velardo, initially, and C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, subsequently, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of various Commission decisions concerning the award to the applicant of directorate general priority points (PPDG) and/or priority points in recognition of additional tasks carried out in the interests of the institution (PPII) under the 2004, 2005 and 2006 promotion exercises.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007, p. 49.
Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2009/5/EC of 30 January 2009 amending Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 3820/85 and 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities ( OJ L 29, 31.1.2009 ) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: legislation, measuring equipment, road transport, speed control, traffic control








L_2009256EN.01003801.xml










29.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 256/38







Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2009/5/EC of 30 January 2009 amending Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 3820/85 and 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities
(Text with EEA relevance)
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 31 January 2009
)

On page 47, entry A1 of the table:
for:

               ‘Not respecting minimum ages for drivers’,
read:

               ‘Not respecting minimum ages for conductors’;
on page 50, entry I5 of the table:
for:

               ‘Unable to produce manual records and printouts made during the current week and the previous 28 days’,
read:

               ‘Unable to produce manual records and printouts made during the current day and the previous 28 days’;
on page 50, entry I7 of the table:
for:

               ‘Unable to produce printouts made during the current week and the previous 28 days’,
read:

               ‘Unable to produce printouts made during the current day and the previous 28 days’.
Case C-384/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 29 September 2009 — PRUNUS SARL v Directeur des Services Fiscaux
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, head office, interpretation of the law, tax, tax avoidance, tax exemption, third country








C_2009312EN.01001701.xml










19.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 312/17





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 29 September 2009 — PRUNUS SARL v Directeur des Services Fiscaux
(Case C-384/09)
2009/C 312/27
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Prunus SARL

Defendant: Directeur des Services Fiscaux

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 56 et seq. of the EC Treaty preclude legislation such as that laid down by Article 990 D et seq. of the Code général des impôts which grants legal persons having their effective centre of management in France or, since 1 January 2008, in a Member State of the European Union, entitlement to exemption from the tax at issue and which, as regards legal persons having their effective centre of management in the territory of a non-Member State, makes that entitlement conditional either on the existence of a convention on administrative assistance to combat tax evasion and avoidance concluded between France and that State or on there being a requirement, under a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality, that those legal persons are not to be taxed more heavily than legal persons having their effective centre of management in France?










2.


Does Article 56 et seq. of the EC Treaty preclude legislation such as that laid down by Article 990 F of the Code général des impôts which enables tax services to hold jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax provided for in Article 990 D et seq. of the Code général des impôts any legal person interposed between the party or parties liable to the tax and the immovable properties or rights in such properties?
Case C-385/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės (Republic of Lithuania) lodged on 29 September 2009 — Nidera Handelscompagnie B.V. v Valstybinės mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Lithuania, VAT, basis of tax assessment, delivery, interpretation of the law, provision of services, tax harmonisation, tax on consumption








C_2009312EN.01001702.xml










19.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 312/17





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės (Republic of Lithuania) lodged on 29 September 2009 — Nidera Handelscompagnie B.V. v Valstybinės mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
(Case C-385/09)
2009/C 312/28
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Nidera Handelscompagnie B.V.

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Questions referred







1.


Is legislation under which the right to deduct VAT is given only to VAT payers — that is to say, only to taxable persons registered as VAT payers in a Member State (in this case, in Lithuania) according to the established procedures — in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the right to deduct VAT?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is it in accordance with the general principles of the right to deduct VAT that are laid down in Directive 2006/112/EC if such legislation provides that a VAT payer has the right to deduct input and/or import VAT in respect of goods and/or services acquired before the date of his registration as a VAT payer only if those goods will be used for an activity of that VAT payer that is subject to VAT, that is to say, input and/or import VAT in respect of goods and services acquired before the date of his registration as a VAT payer may not be deducted if those goods have already been used for that activity?
Joined Cases T-225/07 and T-364/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2009 — Thomson Sales Europe v Commission (Customs union — Imports of colour television receivers manufactured in Thailand — Refund of import duties — Manifest negligence — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Action for annulment — Act having adverse effects — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: CCT duties, European Commission, Thailand, action for annulment (EU), anti-dumping duty, import, redemption, television equipment








C_2009267EN.01005802.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/58





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2009 — Thomson Sales Europe v Commission
(Joined Cases T-225/07 and T-364/07) (1)

(Customs union - Imports of colour television receivers manufactured in Thailand - Refund of import duties - Manifest negligence - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Action for annulment - Act having adverse effects - Inadmissibility)
2009/C 267/101
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Thomson Sales Europe (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: F. Goguel and F. Foucault, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented in Case T-225/07by: X. Lewis, H. van Vliet and S. Schønberg and, in Case T-364/07, by: X. Lewis and M. Patakia, acting as Agents)

Re:

In Case T-225/07, annulment of Commission Decision REM 03/05 of 7 May 2007 stating to the French authorities that the refund of import duties is not justified on the importation of colour television receivers manufactured in Thailand covered by their application of 14 September 2005 and, in Case T-364/07, annulment of the letter of the Commission of 20 July 2007 not confirming acquisition of the entitlement to post-clearance recovery of import duties on those items.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions;










2.


Orders Thomson Sales Europe to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities.






(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Spain, State aid, coal industry, control of State aid, mining industry, production aid








C_2009234EN.01000501.xml










29.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/5





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 234/02






Date of adoption of the decision


13.7.2009




Reference number of State Aid


NN 20/09




Member State


Spain




Region


Andalucía, Aragón, Asturias, Castilla y León, Castilla-La Mancha, Cataluña




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


NN 20/09 — España — Ayudas a la industria del carbón en el período 2008-2010 en el ámbito del artículo 5, apartado 3 del Reglamento (CE) no 1407/2002




Legal basis


Plan Nacional de Reserva Estratégica del Carbón 2006-2012 y Nuevo Modelo de Desarrollo Integral y Sostenible de las Comarcas Mineras, de 28 marzo 2006
Orden ITC/3666/2007, de 14 diciembre 2007




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Maintain access to coal reserves to ensure security of energy supply




Form of aid


Aid to current production in the form of direct subsidies




Budget


EUR 1 246 803 821




Intensity


100 %




Duration (period)


Expiry of the scheme on 31 December 2010




Economic sectors


Mining/coal




Name and address of the granting authority







Instituto para la Reestructuración de la Minería del Carbón




Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio




Po Castellana, 160




7a planta




28071 Madrid




ESPAÑA









SEPI — Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Industriales




Velazquez, 134




28006 Madrid




ESPAÑA








Other information


Existing commitments, provided for in Article 9(11) of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002, extended by the Spanish authorities




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Joined Cases F-69/07 and F-60/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — O v Commission (Staff case — Members of the Contractual staff — Article 88 of the CEOS — Stable employment — Article 100 of the CEOS — Medical proviso — Article 39 EC — Free movement of workers)
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action by staff, contract staff, personnel administration








C_2010024EN.01007002.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/70





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — O v Commission
(Joined Cases F-69/07 and F-60/08) (1)

(Staff case - Members of the Contractual staff - Article 88 of the CEOS - Stable employment - Article 100 of the CEOS - Medical proviso - Article 39 EC - Free movement of workers)
2010/C 24/127
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: O (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Intervener: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially, in Case F-69/07, I. Šulce and M. Simm, Agents, and, in Case F-60/08, I. Šulce and K. Zieleśkiewicz, Agents, and, subsequently, in both cases, by K. Zieleśkiewicz and M. Bauer, Agents.

Re:

F-69/07: Annulment of the Commission’s decisions fixing the conditions of employment of the applicant as a member of the contract staff in so far as they, first, provide for the application of the proviso laid down in Article 100 of the CEOS and in Article 1 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, and, second, limit the duration of the contract to the period from 16 September 2006 to 15 September 2009.
F-60/08: Annulment of the decision of the Commission to apply to the applicant, following the opinion of the Invalidity Committee, the proviso laid down in Article 100 of the CEOS.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 14 September 2006 in so far as it imposes a medical proviso in respect of the applicant;










2.


Dismisses Case F-69/07 O v Commission for the remainder as unfounded;










3.


Dismisses Case F-60/08 O v Commission as inadmissible;










4.


In Case F-69/07, the European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay half of the applicant’s costs;










5.


The applicant is ordered to bear half its costs in Case F-69/07 and to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission in Case F-60/08.






(1)  F-69/07: OJ C 235, 6.10.2007, p. 29.
F-60/08: OJ C 223 of 30.8.2008, p. 63.
Case F-114/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Europol staff — Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol — Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations — Assessment report)
Date: 2009-09-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action by staff, personnel administration, staff assessment, temporary employment, work contract








C_2010024EN.01007202.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/72





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-114/07) (1)

(Civil Service - Europol staff - Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol - Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations - Assessment report)
2010/C 24/131
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Rainer Wenning (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers and subsequently by L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: B. Exterkate and D. El Khoury, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers, and subsequently by D. El Khoury and D. Neumann, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of Europol of 21 December 2006 not to renew the applicant’s contract and not to reinstate him, and an order that Europol renew the applicant’s contract for a period of 4 years from 1 October 2007 and pay damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007, p. 47.