do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009224EN.01000301.xml










17.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 224/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2009
2009/C 224/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4671




JPY


Japanese yen


132,60




DKK


Danish krone


7,4418




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88970




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1396




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5196




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6065




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,245




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


269,84




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7035




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1393




RON


Romanian leu


4,2630




TRY


Turkish lira


2,1695




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6843




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5696




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,3700




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0591




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0719




KRW


South Korean won


1 776,81




ZAR


South African rand


10,8001




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


10,0141




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2965




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 215,86




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1070




PHP


Philippine peso


70,492




RUB


Russian rouble


44,9271




THB


Thai baht


49,522




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6368




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4084




INR


Indian rupee


70,7660






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-28/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 September 2009 — Callewaert v Commission
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, administrative reform, competition (EU), indemnification, professional career, recruitment, regulations for civil servants








C_2010024EN.01008202.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/82





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 September 2009 — Callewaert v Commission
(Case F-28/05) (1)

2010/C 24/158

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 193, 06.08.2005, p. 29 (case initially lodged before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-192/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Court by order of 15.12.2005).
Case C-373/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 17 September 2009 — Josep Penarroja Fa v Procureur général près la Cour de cassation
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, courts and tribunals, expert's report ordered by a court, higher court, interpretation of the law, professional qualifications, recognition of vocational training qualifications








C_2009282EN.01003001.xml










21.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/30





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 17 September 2009 — Josep Penarroja Fa v Procureur général près la Cour de cassation
(Case C-373/09)
2009/C 282/51
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Josep Penarroja Fa

Defendant: Procureur général près la Cour de cassation

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 50 EC be interpreted as applying to the duties entrusted to a professional, acting as an expert, in a dispute brought before the national courts, and appointed by the court seised of the dispute, under the conditions described [in the order for reference]?










2.


Must the connection with the exercise of official authority, referred to in the first paragraph of Article 45 EC, be interpreted as applying to the duties of an expert appointed by a French court, as governed by the French Codes of Civil and Criminal Procedure, and by Law No 71-498 of 29 June 1971 and Decree No 2004-1463 of 23 December 2004?










3.


Must Articles 43 EC and 49 EC be interpreted as precluding legislation, such as that resulting from Law No 71-498 of 29 June 1971 and Decree No 2004-1463 of 23 December 2004, as amended, which restricts enrolment on the national register and the title of expert approved by the Cour de cassation to professionals who have been enrolled for at least three years on a register maintained by a French cour d’appel?










4.


Must Article 3(1)(a) of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 (1) be interpreted as covering the performance of the duties of court expert under the title of court expert approved by the Cour de cassation in accordance with the detailed rules laid down by Law No 71-498 of 29 June 1971 and Decree No 2004-1463 of 23 December 2004, as amended?






(1)  Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5180 — Manitowoc/Enodis) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cold store, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, refrigeration industry








C_2009224EN.01000202.xml










17.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 224/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5180 — Manitowoc/Enodis)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 224/04
On 19 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32008M5180. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5506 — Sabena Technics/TNT Airways/JV) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air transport, aircraft, carriage of goods, economic concentration, exchange of information, freight rate, maintenance, merger control








C_2009224EN.01000102.xml










17.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 224/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5506 — Sabena Technics/TNT Airways/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 224/02
On 4 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5506. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-519/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV, formerly Koninklijke Friesland Foods NV, formerly Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods Holding NV (Appeal — State aid — State aid scheme implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities — Decision No 2003/515/EC — Incompatibility with the common market — Transitional provision — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings — Interest in bringing proceedings — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of equal treatment)
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, aid system, aid to undertakings, appeal, corporation tax, tax system








C_2009267EN.01001301.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/13





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV, formerly Koninklijke Friesland Foods NV, formerly Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods Holding NV
(Case C-519/07 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - State aid scheme implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities - Decision No 2003/515/EC - Incompatibility with the common market - Transitional provision - Admissibility - Standing to bring proceedings - Interest in bringing proceedings - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations - Principle of equal treatment)
2009/C 267/22
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. van Vliet and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV, formerly Koninklijke Friesland Foods NV, formerly Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods Holding NV (represented by: E. Pijnacker Hordijk and W. Geursen, advocaten)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-348/03 Koninklijke Friesland Foods NV (formerly Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods Holding NV) v Commission annulling Article 2 of Commission Decision 2003/515/EC of 17 February 2003 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities (OJ 2003 L 180, p. 52) in so far as it excludes from the transitional scheme those operators who, as at 11 July 2001, had already lodged a request with the Netherlands tax authority for application of the aid scheme in question but whose request had not yet been determined by that date.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 September 2007 in Case T-348/03 Koninklijke Friesland Foods v Commission;










2.


Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5568 — Volkswagen/Fleet Investments/Leaseplan Corporation JV) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, hire purchase, merger control, motor vehicle industry, services company








C_2009224EN.01000201.xml










17.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 224/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5568 — Volkswagen/Fleet Investments/Leaseplan Corporation JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 224/03
On 19 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5568. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-143/09: Order of the Court of 17 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíroság (Republic of Hungary)) — Pannon GSM Távközlési Rt. v Nemzeti Hírközlési Hatóság Tanácsa (Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure — Accession to the European Union — Directive 2002/22/EC — Application ratione temporis — Jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2009-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law, Hungary, State aid, accession to the European Union, administrative procedure, interpretation of the law, price regulations








C_2010051EN.01001601.xml










27.2.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/16





Order of the Court of 17 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíroság (Republic of Hungary)) — Pannon GSM Távközlési Rt. v Nemzeti Hírközlési Hatóság Tanácsa
(Case C-143/09) (1)

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Accession to the European Union - Directive 2002/22/EC - Application ratione temporis - Jurisdiction of the Court)
2010/C 51/25
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíroság (Republic of Hungary)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant(s): Pannon GSM Távközlési Rt.

Defendant(s): Nemzeti Hírközlési Hatóság Tanácsa

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíroság — Interpretation of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 2003 L 236, p. 33), of Articles 10, 87(1) and 249 EC and of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51) — Sharing of the net cost of the universal service obligation between providers of networks and electronic communications services — National legislation on the mechanisms for cost sharing providing for the application of rules incompatible with the directive as regards the financing of universal services provided during the year preceding the accession of the Member State in question to the European Union

Operative part

Article 13(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’) and Annex IV to that directive do not apply to the facts of a dispute such as that in the main proceedings, which concerns a contribution in the field of electronic communications charged by the authorities of the Republic of Hungary for 2003.


(1)  OJ C 153, 04.07.2009