do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009223EN.01001301.xml










16.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/13





Euro exchange rates (1)

15 September 2009
2009/C 223/07

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4611




JPY


Japanese yen


133,26




DKK


Danish krone


7,4430




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88690




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2438




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5162




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6390




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,351




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


272,02




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7023




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1635




RON


Romanian leu


4,2678




TRY


Turkish lira


2,1781




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7014




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5869




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,3235




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0883




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0796




KRW


South Korean won


1 780,25




ZAR


South African rand


10,8246




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,9777




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3252




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 502,11




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1175




PHP


Philippine peso


70,622




RUB


Russian rouble


45,0950




THB


Thai baht


49,524




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6464




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4908




INR


Indian rupee


71,0680






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-356/09: Action brought on 16 September 2009 — Commission v Association Fédération Club B2A
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU financing, European Commission, appeal, contract, fine, innovation, investment, redemption, regional cooperation, type of business








C_2009267EN.01007801.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/78





Action brought on 16 September 2009 — Commission v Association Fédération Club B2A
(Case T-356/09)
2009/C 267/139
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (Étupes, France) (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and N. Bambara, acting as Agents, and E. Bouttier, lawyer)

Defendant: Association Fédération Club B2A

Form of order sought







—


order the Fédération, represented by its President, to pay to the applicant the amount of … euros … corresponding to the principal sum of EUR 62 500 and the sum of … euros … in late-payment interest falling due on …;










—


order the Fédération to pay the sum of EUR 7 000 in order to cover the costs incurred by the Commission in recovering its debt;










—


order the Fédération to pay the costs of the present case.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the Commission, concluded a grant contract in respect of a project for the ‘creation and operation of a federation of regional networks of Business Angels for Eastern France’. The project, during which the Commission paid, as an advance, the sum of EUR 62 500 to the defendant, was completed on 30 September 2002.
In that contract, the defendant undertook, inter alia, to provide a final report. Since an incomplete report was provided, the Commission put the defendant on formal notice to produce a report that met the objectives. Since that letter of formal notice and numerous other letters went unanswered by the defendant, the Commission sent a debit note and then an order for recovery of the amount of EUR 62 500 to the defendant.
Since that debt remains unpaid, the Commission is seeking an order that the defendant pay the sum due and the losses suffered in order to cover the entirety of the expenses which the Commission has had to incur in order to recover its debt, submitting that a) the defendant has failed to fulfil its obligations laid down in the contract by failing to submit a full final report and b) payment of the sum of EUR 62 500 by the Commission was made as an advance pending acceptance of the final report.
Case F-130/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 September 2009 — Vinci v European Central Bank (Staff case — Staff of the ECB — Allegedly unlawful treatment of medical data — Medical visit imposed)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Central Bank, action by staff, data processing, data protection, medical data, medical examination, personal data








C_2010024EN.01007302.xml










30.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/73





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 September 2009 — Vinci v European Central Bank
(Case F-130/07) (1)

(Staff case - Staff of the ECB - Allegedly unlawful treatment of medical data - Medical visit imposed)
2010/C 24/134
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Vinci (Schöneck, Germany) (represented by: B. Karthaus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Malfrère and F. Feyerbacher, Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann)

Re:

Application for a declaration that the registration of documents containing medical data is unlawful and for annulment of the decision of the ECB refusing, firstly, to erase the personal data derived from those documents, and secondly, ordering the applicant to have a medical examination, and an application for compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008, p. 32.
Case T-162/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia v Council and Commission (Non-contractual liability — Customs union — Proof of the Community nature of products of sea-fishing — Submission of certain documents as proof not possible — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Liability of the Community in the absence of unlawful conduct by its bodies)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European Commission, Tunisia, carriage of goods, customs transit, fishery product, fishing area, fishing rights








C_2009267EN.01005701.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/57





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia v Council and Commission
(Case T-162/07) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Customs union - Proof of the Community nature of products of sea-fishing - Submission of certain documents as proof not possible - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Liability of the Community in the absence of unlawful conduct by its bodies)
2009/C 267/98
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia (Moschato, Greece) (represented by: N. Skandamis and E. Perakis, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented initially by F. Florindo Gijón and M.-M. Joséphidès, and subsequently by F. Florido Gijón and M. Balta, Agents); and Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by E. Cujo, S. Schønberg and M. Konstantinidis, and subsequently by S. Schønberg and M. Patakia, Agents)

Re:

Action for damages to compensate for the damage alleged to have been suffered by the applicant as a result of the fact that the Council and the Commission did not adopt provisions enabling the customs authorities of a Member State to accept as proof of the Community nature of products of sea-fishing documents other than the T2M form provided for in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.
Case T-391/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Alber v OHIM (hand grip) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Hand grip — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Duty to give reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Principle of examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), agricultural implement, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01006002.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/60





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Alber v OHIM (hand grip)
(Case T-391/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Hand grip - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Duty to give reasons - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Principle of examination of the facts of its own motion - Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/105
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Alfons Alber (Verona, Italy) (represented by: S.Schneller, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 August 2007 (Case R 361/2007-4) and against the decision of the examiner of OHIM of 16 January 2007 in that case, in so far it rejects Community trade mark application No 4396727 for certain goods covered by that mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Alfons Alber to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007.
Case T-221/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Hipp & Co v OHIM — Laboratoris Ordesa (Bebimil) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark Bebimil — Earlier Community and national word marks BLEMIL — Earlier national word mark BLEMIL 1 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of confusion)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), baby food, powdered milk, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01005402.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/54





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Hipp & Co v OHIM — Laboratoris Ordesa (Bebimil)
(Case T-221/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark Bebimil - Earlier Community and national word marks BLEMIL - Earlier national word mark BLEMIL 1 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Likelihood of confusion)
2009/C 267/92
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hipp & Co KG (Sachseln, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Latinien and A. Folliard-Mongiural, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Laboratoris Ordesa, SL (Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Thierie and E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2006 (Case R 571/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ordesa, SL and Hipp & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


orders Hipp & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5609 — ISP/RDM/Manucor) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, financial institution, financial services, merger control, plastics, recycled product, thin sheet, waste recycling








C_2009223EN.01001202.xml










16.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/12





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5609 — ISP/RDM/Manucor)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 223/06
On 3 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5609. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-130/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Gres La Sagra v OHIM — Ceramicalcora (VENATTO MARBLE STONE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark VENATTO MARBLE STONE — Earlier national figurative marks VENETO CERÁMICAS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), building materials, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01006203.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/62





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Gres La Sagra v OHIM — Ceramicalcora (VENATTO MARBLE STONE)
(Case T-130/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark VENATTO MARBLE STONE - Earlier national figurative marks VENETO CERÁMICAS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/111
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gres La Sagra, SL (Alameda de la Sagra, Spain) (represented by: T. Villate Consonni and J. Calderón Chavero, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ceramicalcora, SA (Alcora, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2008 (Case R 1609/2006-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Ceramicalcora, SA and Gres La Sagra, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Gres La Sagra, SL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.
Case T-458/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Dominio de la Vega v OHIM — Ambrosio Velasco (DOMINIO DE LA VEGA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark DOMINIO DE LA VEGA — Earlier Community figurative mark PALACIO DE LA VEGA — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), alcoholic beverage, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01006102.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/61





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Dominio de la Vega v OHIM — Ambrosio Velasco (DOMINIO DE LA VEGA)
(Case T-458/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark DOMINIO DE LA VEGA - Earlier Community figurative mark PALACIO DE LA VEGA - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/108
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Dominio de la Vega, SL (Requena, Spain) (represented by: E. Caballero Oliver and A. Sanz-Bernell y Martinéz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Laporta Insa, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Ambrosio Velasco, SA (Dicastillo, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2007 (Case R 1431/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Ambrosio Velasco, SA and Dominio de la Vega, SL.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Dominio de la Vega, SL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.
Case T-80/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — JanSport Apparel v OHIM (BUILT TO RESIST) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark BUILT TO RESIST — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), clothing industry, leather, pulp and paper industry, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01005602.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/56





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — JanSport Apparel v OHIM (BUILT TO RESIST)
(Case T-80/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark BUILT TO RESIST - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/96
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: JanSport Apparel Corp. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, C. Casalonga and K. Dimidjian-Lecompte, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen initially, and subsequently by O. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of 12 January 2007 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1090/2006-2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark BUILT TO RESIST as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders JanSport Apparel Corp. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.
Case T-400/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Zero Industry v OHIM — zero Germany (zerorh+) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ — Earlier national figurative and word marks zero — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity between products — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2009-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), optical industry, trade-mark law








C_2009267EN.01005601.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/56





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Zero Industry v OHIM — zero Germany (zerorh+)
(Case T-400/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ - Earlier national figurative and word marks zero - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity between products - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/95
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Zero Industry Srl (Mariano Comense, Italy) (represented by: M. Rapisardi and N. Colombo, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG, formerly zero International Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: W.-D. Kuntze, lawyer)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 October 2006 (Case R 958/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG and Zero Industry Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Zero Industry Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.