do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-347/09: Action brought on 31 August 2009 — Germany v Commission
Date: 2009-08-31
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Germany, State aid, action for annulment (EU), control of State aid, environmental protection








C_2009267EN.01007502.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/75





Action brought on 31 August 2009 — Germany v Commission
(Case T-347/09)
2009/C 267/135
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and B. Klein)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought







—


Declare Commission Decision SG-Greffe (2009) D/3985 on State aid No NN 8/2009 of 2 July 2009 null and void, to the extent that the measures notified are categorised as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges Commission Decision K(2009) 5080, definitive since 2 July 2009, concerning aid rules which consist of, first, the free transfer of federally-owned national nature reserves and, second, support for large conservation projects (State aid NN 8/21009 — Germany — Conservation areas). In that decision, the Commission takes the view that the aid rules notified are compatible with the common market under Article 86(2) EC. The applicant challenges the contested decision, to the extent that the measures notified are categorised as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC.
As the basis of its action, the applicant claims that the defendant incorrectly applied Article 87(1) EC in a number of respects. In that regard, it is submitted, inter alia, that the defendant wrongly categorises conservation organisations as undertakings and wrongly failed to carry out the necessary overall assessment of the measures referred to. Furthermore, the conservation organisations have obtained no material advantage for State aid purposes from the measures referred to. The applicant further complains of an incorrect application of the fourth criterion laid down by the Court of Justice in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans und Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-7747.
In the alternative, a breach of the duty to state reasons laid down in Article 253 EC is claimed.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 791/2009 of 31 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-08-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2009228EN.01000101.xml










1.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 228/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 791/2009
of 31 August 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 August 2009.


For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MK 


40,3 




XS 


37,6 




ZZ 


39,0 




0707 00 05 


MK 


33,2 




TR 


96,4 




ZZ 


64,8 




0709 90 70 


TR 


106,5 




ZZ 


106,5 




0805 50 10 


AR 


104,8 




BR 


122,7 




UY 


119,3 




ZA 


108,5 




ZZ 


113,8 




0806 10 10 


EG 


155,8 




TR 


106,4 




ZZ 


131,1 




0808 10 80 


AR 


114,0 




BR 


61,1 




CL 


80,6 




CN 


67,1 




NZ 


83,9 




ZA 


83,3 




ZZ 


81,7 




0808 20 50 


AR 


145,7 




TR 


122,4 




ZA 


88,8 




ZZ 


119,0 




0809 30 


TR 


133,9 




ZZ 


133,9 




0809 40 05 


IL 


93,9 




ZZ 


93,9 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-348/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Münster (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2009 — Pietro Infusino v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid
Date: 2009-08-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU visa policy, European citizenship, freedom of movement, interpretation of the law, public safety, residence permit








C_2009282EN.01002701.xml










21.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/27





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Münster (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2009 — Pietro Infusino v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid
(Case C-348/09)
2009/C 282/46
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Münster

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pietro Infusino

Defendant: Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid

Question referred

Does the term ‘imperative grounds of public security’ contained in Article 28(3) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (1) cover only threats posed to the internal and external security of the State in terms of the continued existence of the State with its institutions and important public services, the survival of the population, foreign relations and the peaceful co-existence of nations?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77.