do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-303/09: Action brought on 3 August 2009 — CIVR and Others v Commission
Date: 2009-08-03
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, State aid, action for annulment (EU), aid to agriculture, interpretation of the law, marketing, production aid, professional association, research and development, restriction on competition, social-security contribution, technical cooperation








C_2009244EN.01001101.xml










10.10.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/11





Action brought on 3 August 2009 — CIVR and Others v Commission
(Case T-303/09)
2009/C 244/17
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Conseil interprofessionnel des vins du Roussillon — CIVR (Perpignan, France), Comité national des interprofessions des vins à appellation d’origine et à indication géographique — CNIV (Paris, France), Interprofession nationale porcine — Inaporc (Paris) and Others (Perpignan, France) (represented by: H. Calvet, O. Billard and Y. Trifounovitch, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 10 December 2008 State aid N 561/2008 — France — Actions led by inter-branch organisations, C(2008) 7846 final, (1) inasmuch as it found the actions led by the agricultural inter-branch organisations in technical assistance, production and marketing aid for quality products, research and development and marketing to be State aid and inasmuch as it found compulsory voluntary levies used to finance those actions to be State resources;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicants seek partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008, by which the Commission had found that the framework scheme of actions liable to be carried out by the French agricultural inter-branch organisations, consisting in aid for technical assistance, for production and marketing for quality products, for research and development and marketing for primary producers and undertakings engaged in processing and marketing agricultural products, financed through voluntary levies made compulsory by inter-ministerial decree, to be collected from the members of those inter-branch organisations, were a measure constituting State aid compatible with the common market.
The pleas in law and principal arguments relied on by the applicant are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-293/09 CNIEL v Commission.


(1)  OJ 2009, C 116, p. 14.
Case C-308/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — B.A.M. Vermeer Contracting Sp. z o.o.; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
Date: 2009-08-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, labour law, labour mobility








C_2009267EN.01003402.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/34





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — B.A.M. Vermeer Contracting Sp. z o.o.; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
(Case C-308/09)
2009/C 267/63
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: B.A.M. Vermeer Contracting Sp. z. o.o.

Other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1)











2.


On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC?






(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).
Case C-309/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Olbek Industrial Services sp. z.o.o.; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
Date: 2009-08-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, labour law, labour mobility








C_2009267EN.01003403.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/34





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Olbek Industrial Services sp. z.o.o.; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
(Case C-309/09)
2009/C 267/64
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Olbek Industrial Services sp. z o.o.

Other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1)











2.


On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC?






(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 700/2009 of 3 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-08-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2009202EN.01000101.xml










4.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 202/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 700/2009
of 3 August 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 August 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 August 2009.


For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MK 


26,9 




ZZ 


26,9 




0707 00 05 


MK 


25,2 




TR 


100,7 




ZZ 


63,0 




0709 90 70 


TR 


99,9 




ZZ 


99,9 




0805 50 10 


AR 


67,9 




UY 


60,3 




ZA 


67,3 




ZZ 


65,2 




0806 10 10 


EG 


156,1 




MA 


135,1 




TR 


134,8 




ZA 


127,1 




ZZ 


138,3 




0808 10 80 


AR 


121,2 




BR 


85,9 




CL 


86,1 




CN 


81,7 




NZ 


107,5 




US 


105,4 




ZA 


91,4 




ZZ 


97,0 




0808 20 50 


AR 


105,2 




CL 


77,9 




TR 


147,8 




ZA 


102,4 




ZZ 


108,3 




0809 20 95 


TR 


263,6 




US 


342,7 




ZZ 


303,2 




0809 30 


TR 


148,5 




ZZ 


148,5 




0809 40 05 


BA 


39,5 




ZZ 


39,5 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-307/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Vicoplus SC PUH; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
Date: 2009-08-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, labour law, labour mobility








C_2009267EN.01003401.xml










7.11.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/34





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Vicoplus SC PUH; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
(Case C-307/09)
2009/C 267/62
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Vicoplus SC PUH

Other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1)











2.


On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC?






(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).