do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections ( OJ C 173, 25.7.2009 )
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Spain, State aid, control of State aid, exchange of information, natural disaster, transport of animals








C_2009178EN.01002901.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/29





Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 173 of 25 July 2009
)

2009/C 178/15
On page 1, ‘Reference number of State Aid’:
for:
‘N 59/03 (ex N 667/02 and N 665/02)’,
read:
‘NN 59/03 (ex N 667/02 and N 665/02)’.
Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community for pigmeat products
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, import licence, import policy, pigmeat, tariff quota








C_2009178EN.01000501.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/5





Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community for pigmeat products
2009/C 178/02
Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2009 do not, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2009; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.


(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.


ANNEX






Quota order number


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009
(kg)




09.4038


3 396 840




09.4170


1 180 500




09.4204


1 156 000
List of names of geographical units smaller than the Member State as referred to in Article 51(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (table wines with geographical indication) (Published pursuant to Article 28(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002)
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: alcoholic beverage, food production, gross regional product, location of production, originating product, region, table wine, wine








C_2009178EN.01001101.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/11





List of names of geographical units smaller than the Member State as referred to in Article 51(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (table wines with geographical indication)

(Published pursuant to Article 28(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002)

2009/C 178/07
Owing to technical reasons, the above mentioned list will be published in OJ C 187 on 8 August 2009.
Case C-306/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 31 July 2009 — I.B. v Conseil des ministres
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, carrying out of sentence, interpretation of the law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, legal process, restriction of liberty








C_2009233EN.01001102.xml










26.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/11





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 31 July 2009 — I.B. v Conseil des ministres
(Case C-306/09)
2009/C 233/19
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour consitutionnelle

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: I.B.

Defendant: Conseil des ministres

Questions referred







1.


Is a European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of the execution of a sentence imposed in absentia, without the convicted person having been informed of the date and place of the hearing, and against which that person still has a remedy, to be considered to be, not an arrest warrant issued for the purposes of the execution of a custodial sentence or detention order within the meaning of Article 4(6) of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, (1) but an arrest warrant for the purposes of prosecution within the meaning of Article 5(3) of the Framework Decision?










2.


If the reply to the first question is in the negative, are Article 4(6) and Article 5(6) of the Framework Decision to be interpreted as not permitting the Member States to make the surrender to the judicial authorities of the issuing State of a person residing on their territory who is the subject, in the circumstances described in the first question, of an arrest warrant for the purposes of the execution of a custodial sentence or detention order, subject to a condition that that person be returned to the executing State in order to serve there the custodial sentence or detention order imposed by a final judgment against that person in the issuing State?










3.


If the reply to the second question is in the affirmative, do the articles in question contravene Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and, in particular, the principles of equality and non-discrimination?










4.


If the reply to the first question is in the negative, are Articles 3 and 4 of the Framework Decision to be interpreted as preventing the judicial authorities of a Member State from refusing the execution of a European arrest warrant if there are valid grounds for believing that its execution would have the effect of infringing the fundamental rights of the person concerned, as enshrined by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union?






(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.
Commission communication on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Regulation (EC) No 620/2009
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: beef, certificate of origin, exchange of information, originating product, powers of the institutions (EU), product quality








C_2009178EN.01001001.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/10





Commission communication on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Regulation (EC) No 620/2009
2009/C 178/05
By Council Regulation (EC) No 617/2009 of 13 July 2009, published in 
Official Journal of the European Union L 182 of 15 July 2009, an import tariff quota for high-quality beef has been opened.
Under Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 620/2009 of 13 July 2009, the release for free circulation of the goods imported under that quota is conditional upon presentation of a certificate of authenticity.
The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under the Regulation.
Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)





United States Mission to the European Union




Office of Agricultural Affairs




Boulevard du Régent 27




1000 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIE




E-mail: aguseubrussels@fas.usda.gov
Political and Security Committee Decision EUMM Georgia/1/2009 of 31 July 2009 concerning the extension of the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia)
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: Georgia, appointment of staff, cooperation policy, fact-finding mission, observation, power of attorney, the EU's international role, working time








L_2009214EN.01004001.xml










19.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 214/40








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUMM GEORGIA/1/2009
of 31 July 2009
         
concerning the extension of the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia)
(2009/619/CFSP)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,


Having regard to Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP of 15 September 2008 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Under Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purposes of political control and strategic direction of EUMM Georgia and in particular to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 16 September 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, the PSC appointed by its Decision EUMM/1/2008 (2) Mr Hansjörg HABER as Head of Mission of EUMM Georgia until 15 September 2009.












(3)


On 16 July 2009 the Secretary-General/High Representative proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Hansjörg HABER for an additional year, until 15 September 2010,





HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Hansjörg HABER as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) is hereby extended until 15 September 2010.


Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.
It shall apply until 15 September 2010.




Done at Brussels, 31 July 2009.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

O. SKOOG
            





(1)  
            OJ L 248, 17.9.2008, p. 26.

(2)  
            OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 79.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5548 — Barclays/RBS/Hillary) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: access to information, economic concentration, electronic mail, exchange of information, financial institution, health care, merger control, provision of services








C_2009178EN.01000901.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/9





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5548 — Barclays/RBS/Hillary)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 178/04
On 6 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5548. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009178EN.01001401.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/14





Euro exchange rates (1)

30 July 2009
2009/C 178/11

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4053




JPY


Japanese yen


133,89




DKK


Danish krone


7,4453




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85240




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4515




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5314




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,7490




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,581




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


268,31




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7014




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1775




RON


Romanian leu


4,2070




TRY


Turkish lira


2,0861




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7042




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5240




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8911




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,1555




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0296




KRW


South Korean won


1 735,50




ZAR


South African rand


11,0079




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,6014




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3615




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 989,56




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9628




PHP


Philippine peso


67,602




RUB


Russian rouble


44,5060




THB


Thai baht


47,857




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6495




MXN


Mexican peso


18,6483




INR


Indian rupee


67,8900






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
List of quality wines produced in specified regions (Published pursuant to Article 54 (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999)
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: alcoholic beverage, designation of origin, location of production, originating product, wine, wine of superior quality








C_2009178EN.01001102.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/11





List of quality wines produced in specified regions

(Published pursuant to Article 54 (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999)

2009/C 178/08
Owing to technical reasons, the above mentioned list will be published in OJ C 187 on 8 August 2009.
Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, egg, egg product, import licence, import policy, poultrymeat, tariff quota








C_2009178EN.01000701.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/7





Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin
2009/C 178/03
Commission Regulations (EC) No 536/2007 (1) and (EC) No 539/2007 (2) opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2009 do not, for quotas 09.4169, 09.4015 and 09.4402, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (3), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2009; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.


(1)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

(2)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 19.

(3)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.


ANNEX






Quota order number


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009
(kg)




09.4169


4 091 250




09.4015


27 000 000




09.4402


1 762 626
Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, air transport, airline, disclosure of information, transport regulations








C_2009178EN.01001002.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/10





Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 178/06






Member State


Italy




Route concerned


Bolzano–Roma Fiumicino and vice versa




Period of validity of the contract


From 1 December 2009 to 30 November 2012




Deadline for submission of tenders


Two days after the publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge







ENAC Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile




Direzione Trasporto Aereo




Viale del Castro Pretorio 118




00185 Roma RM




ITALY




http://www.enac-italia.it




E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it
Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC ( OJ L 188, 18.7.2009 )
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: access to information, commercial vehicle, engine, general mechanical engineering, motor vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions








L_2009200EN.01005201.xml










31.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/52







Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 18 July 2009
)

On page 9, Article 18, second paragraph, first sentence:
for:

               ‘It shall apply from 7 August 2009.’,
read:

               ‘It shall apply from 31 December 2012.’.
Case T-304/09: Action brought on 31 July 2009 — Tilda Riceland v OHIM — Siam Grains (BASMALI LONG GRAIN RICE RIZ LONG DE LUXE)
Date: 2009-07-31
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), rice, trade-mark law








C_2009244EN.01001102.xml










10.10.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/11





Action brought on 31 July 2009 — Tilda Riceland v OHIM — Siam Grains (BASMALI LONG GRAIN RICE RIZ LONG DE LUXE)
(Case T-304/09)
2009/C 244/18
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicants: Tilda Riceland Ltd (Gurgaon, India) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, D. Sills and N. Urwin, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Siam Grains Company Limited (Bangkok, Thailand)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 March 2009 in case R 513/2008-1; and










—


Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay their own costs and those of the applicant





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘BASMALI LONG GRAIN RICE RIZ LONG DE LUXE’, for goods in class 30

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: A non-registered trade mark of the word ’BASMATI” used for rice and a sign consisting of the word ‘BASMATI’ used in the course of trade designating a class of goods, namely rice

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly based its decision solely upon an interpretation of the provision which fails to take into account national rules and judicial decisions delivered in the Member State concerned; secondly, the Board of Appeal failed to apply the law of a Member State, namely the United Kingdom, in relation to the form of action known as the ‘extended form of passing off’; thirdly, the Board of Appeal erred in requiring that the applicant must hold proprietary rights to the sign ‘BASMATI’; finally, the Board of Appeal erred in holding that the word ‘BASMATI’ is generic.