Case T-301/09: Action brought on 28 July 2009 — IG Communications v OHIM — Citicorp and Citibank (CITIGATE)
Date: 2009-07-28
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), advertising, audiovisual equipment, consultancy, goods and services, publication, trade-mark law








C_2009244EN.01001001.xml










10.10.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/10





Action brought on 28 July 2009 — IG Communications v OHIM — Citicorp and Citibank (CITIGATE)
(Case T-301/09)
2009/C 244/15
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicants: IG Communications Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Beard, Solicitor and M. Edenborough, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. (New York, United States)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 April 2009 in case R 821/2005-1 in its entirety, or alternatively in part; and










—


Award the applicant the costs incurred in connection with this appeal before the Court of First Instance.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CITIGATE’, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35 and 42

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITI’ for services in class 36; Community trade mark application of the figurative mark ‘citi’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITICORP’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIGROUP’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIBOND’ for goods and services in classes 16, 36 and 38; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIEQUITY’ for goods and services in classes 16, 36 and 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIGARANT’ for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 36 and 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIBANK’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITICARD’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIGOLD’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36; German trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIBANK’ for services in class 36; United Kingdom trade mark registration of the word mark ‘CITIBANK’ for services in class 36; Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘THE CITI NEVER SLEEPS’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16 and 36.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the Community trade mark applied for

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a family of earlier trade marks and, as a consequence, that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned; Infringement of Article 8(5) Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a family of earlier trade marks and, as a consequence, that there was a conflict between the trade marks concerned.