do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance )
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, air transport, airline, airport, invitation to tender, transport regulations








C_2009139EN.01000501.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/5





Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 139/05






Member State


France




Concerned route


Brive–Paris (Orly)




Period of validity of the contract


5 January 2010-4 January 2014




Deadline for submission of tenders


First step: 14 August 2009 (12.00, local time).
Second step: 22 September 2009 (12.00, local time).




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Syndicat mixte pour la création et l’aménagement de l’aérodrome de Brive-Souillac




Mairie de Brive-la-Gaillarde




B.P. 80433




19312 Brive-la-Gaillarde Cedex




FRANCE




Tél. +33 555923939




Fax +33 555181699




E-mail: aeroportbrivesouillac@orange.fr
Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 ( OJ L 69, 13.3.2009 )
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Community budget, European Union, adoption of the budget, financial year, general budget (EU)




L_2009157EN.01006701.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 157/67







Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009

(
(Official Journal of the European Union L 69 of 13 March 2009
)


On page I/159, the table is replaced by the following table:









Function group and grade


European Economic and Social Committee




2009


2008




Permanent posts


Temporary posts


Permanent posts


Temporary posts






Non-category


—


1


—


1




AD 16


—


—


—


—




AD 15


5


—


5


—




AD 14


21


1


21


1




AD 13


11


—


7


—




AD 12


57


3


51


3




AD 11


36


—


43


—




AD 10


29


—


35


—




AD 9


21


3


15


3




AD 8


9


3


12


3




AD 7


14


—


14


—




AD 6


53


1


73


1




AD 5


63


1


40


1




AD total


319


13


316


13






AST 11


3


—


2


—




AST 10


7


—


8


—




AST 9


16


—


18


—




AST 8


13


2


7


2




AST 7


29


4


27


1




AST 6


71


2


77


2




AST 5


46


7


50


10




AST 4


43


1


45


1




AST 3


59


—


56


—




AST 2


6


—


33


—




AST 1


61


2


31


1




AST total


354


18


354


17







Grand total




673




31




670




30
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2009139EN.01000401.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

18 June 2009
2009/C 139/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3920




JPY


Japanese yen


133,57




DKK


Danish krone


7,4440




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85830




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9660




CHF


Swiss franc


1,5013




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8825




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


26,645




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


283,57




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6980




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5575




RON


Romanian leu


4,2319




TRY


Turkish lira


2,1822




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7528




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5758




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,7885




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,1923




SGD


Singapore dollar


2,0292




KRW


South Korean won


1 761,44




ZAR


South African rand


11,3480




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,5139




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,2920




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 310,78




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9284




PHP


Philippine peso


67,322




RUB


Russian rouble


43,4455




THB


Thai baht


47,533




BRL


Brazilian real


2,7519




MXN


Mexican peso


18,6946




INR


Indian rupee


66,9690






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-269/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2009 — Socratec v Commission ( Competition — Concentrations — Market in road traffic telematic systems — Applicant declared insolvent in course of proceedings — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate )
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, General Court (EU), action for annulment (EU), economic concentration, merger control, telematics








C_2009180EN.01004002.xml










1.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/40





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2009 — Socratec v Commission
(Case T-269/03) (1)

(‘Competition - Concentrations - Market in road traffic telematic systems - Applicant declared insolvent in course of proceedings - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate’)
2009/C 180/73
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Socratec — Satellite Navigation Consulting, Research & Technology GmbH (Regensburg) (represented by: M. Adolf and M. Lüken, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially S. Rating, then A. Whelan and K. Mojzesowicz, and latterly K. Mojzesowicz and X. Lewis, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV (Waarle, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Berrisch and D.W. Hull, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Daimler AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler AG (Stuttgart, Germany); Daimler Financial Services AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler Services AG (Berlin, Germany); Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany); Toll Collect GmbH (Berlin) (represented by: J. Schütze and A. von Graevenitz, lawyers); and Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially C. D. Quassowski and S. Flockermann, then M. Lumma, agents, assisted by U. Karpenstein and A. Rosenfeld, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2003/792/EC of 30 April 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2903 — DaimlerChrysler/Deutsche Telekom Joint Venture) (OJ 2003 L 300, p. 62).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;










2.


orders Socratec — Satellite Navigation Consulting, Research & Technology GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Commission, Daimler AG, Daimler Financial Services AG, Deutsche Telekom AG and Toll Collect GmbH;










3.


orders Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV to bear its own costs;










4.


orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration — (Case COMP/M.5524 — METEO-FRANCE/CDC/NYSE EURONEXT/METNEXT) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: climate, climate change, economic concentration, exchange of information, financial institution, insurance, merger control, meteorology, property market, provision of services








C_2009139EN.01000101.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5524 — METEO-FRANCE/CDC/NYSE EURONEXT/METNEXT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 139/01
On 9 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5524. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-369/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 June 2009 — Spain v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Aids for restructuring and conversion in the wine sector — Aids for the improvement of the production and marketing of honey — Concept of loss of revenue due to implementation of the plan — Article 13(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 — Concept of intervention intended to stabilise the agricultural markets — Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999)
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, EU financing arrangements, European Commission, General Court (EU), Spain, action for failure to fulfil an obligation








C_2009180EN.01004301.xml










1.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/43





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 June 2009 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-369/05) (1)

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Aids for restructuring and conversion in the wine sector - Aids for the improvement of the production and marketing of honey - Concept of loss of revenue due to implementation of the plan - Article 13(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 - Concept of intervention intended to stabilise the agricultural markets - Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999)
2009/C 180/78
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2005/555/EC of 15 July 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2005 L 188, p. 36), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Spain in the wine and honey sectors.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.
Case T-48/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 June 2009 — Qualcomm v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for traffic telematics systems — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market — Commitments — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: General Court (EU), action for annulment (EU), common market, competition law, economic concentration, merger control, telematics








C_2009180EN.01004101.xml










1.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/41





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 June 2009 — Qualcomm v Commission
(Case T-48/04) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - Market for traffic telematics systems - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market - Commitments - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
2009/C 180/74
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV (Waarle, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, and D. Hull, Solicitor)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: K. Mojzesowicz and A. Whelan, and subsequently by K. Mojzesowicz and X. Lewis, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by: C.-D. Quassowski and S. Flockermann, acting as Agents, and subsequently by M. Lumma, acting as Agent, and by U. Karpenstein and A. Rosenfeld, lawyer); Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany); Daimler AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler AG (Stuttgart, Germany); Daimler Financial Services AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler Services AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by J. Schütze and A. von Graevenitz, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2003/792/EC of 30 April 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2903 — DaimlerChrysler/Deutsche Telekom/JV) (OJ 2003 L 300, p. 62)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs;










4.


Orders Deutsche Telekom AG, Daimler AG and Daimler Financial Services AG to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2009 of 19 June 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2009159EN.01000101.xml










20.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 159/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 535/2009
of 19 June 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 June 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 June 2009.


For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


CL 


55,0 




MA 


32,7 




MK 


38,5 




TR 


51,6 




ZZ 


44,5 




0707 00 05 


JO 


156,8 




MK 


29,2 




TR 


116,9 




ZZ 


101,0 




0709 90 70 


TR 


104,9 




ZZ 


104,9 




0805 50 10 


AR 


60,5 




BR 


104,3 




TR 


53,8 




ZA 


71,4 




ZZ 


72,5 




0808 10 80 


AR 


79,6 




BR 


69,6 




CL 


76,5 




CN 


97,4 




NZ 


106,8 




US 


92,8 




UY 


49,5 




ZA 


85,7 




ZZ 


82,2 




0809 10 00 


TR 


212,2 




US 


174,4 




ZZ 


193,3 




0809 20 95 


TR 


363,4 




ZZ 


363,4 




0809 30 


MA 


405,8 




TR 


138,0 




US 


203,1 




ZZ 


249,0 




0809 40 05 


AU 


289,7 




CL 


108,6 




ZZ 


199,2 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5489 — Bosch Thermotechnik/Loos) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: combustion gases, economic concentration, exchange of information, fuel oil, heating, merger control








C_2009139EN.01001501.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/15





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5489 — Bosch Thermotechnik/Loos)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 139/11






1.


On 12 June 2009 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Bosch Thermotechnik GmbH (‘Bosch Thermotechnik’, Germany) controlled by Robert Bosch GmbH, Germany acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Loos Deutschland GmbH (‘Loos’, Germany) by way of purchase of securities.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for undertaking Bosch Thermotechnik: Bosch Thermotechnik is a supplier of heating appliances. Through its brands Buderus and Junkers, it is in particular active in the area of walled or mounted (using either fuel gas or fuel oil) heating systems,










—


for undertaking Loos: Loos is a family-owned company active as a supplier of commercial and industrial boiler systems.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5489 — Bosch Thermotechnik/Loos, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-224/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 19 June 2009 — Criminal proceedings against Martha Nussbaumer
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: building industry, building permit, construction equipment, interpretation of the law, liability, public works








C_2009205EN.01002501.xml










29.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/25





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 19 June 2009 — Criminal proceedings against Martha Nussbaumer
(Case C-224/09)
2009/C 205/42
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bolzano

Party to the main proceedings

Martha Nussbaumer

Questions referred







1.


Is the national legislation enacted by Legislative Decree No 81 of 9 April 2008, in particular the rule in Article 90(11) thereof, in breach of the rules laid down in Article 3 of Directive 92/57/EEC, (1) in so far as it derogates, for private works not subject to planning permission, from the requirement imposed on the client or the project supervisor in Article 90(3) of the decree to appoint a coordinator for the preparation stage for a construction site on which more than one contractor is present and fails to give any consideration to the nature of the works or to whether there are particular risks of the kind listed in Annex II to the directive?










2.


Is the national legislation enacted by Legislative Decree No 81 of 9 April 2008, in particular the rule in Article 90(11) thereof, in breach of the rules laid down in Article 3 of Directive 92/57/EEC with respect to the requirement for the client or the project supervisor to appoint, in all cases, a coordinator during the execution stage of works on construction sites, irrespective of the type of works concerned, and hence also in the case of private works not subject to planning permission which may entail the risks referred to in Annex II to the Directive?










3.


Is Article 90(11) of Legislative Decree No 81 of 9 April 2008, in so far as it requires the coordinator for the execution stage to draw up a safety plan only if, in the case of private works not subject to planning permission, other undertakings besides the original contractor appointed become involved in the course of the project, in breach of Article 3 of Directive 92/57/EEC, which requires a coordinator for the execution stage to be appointed in all cases, irrespective of the type of works involved, and which allows no derogation from the requirement to draw up a safety and health plan where the work concerned involves particular risks, as set out in Annex II to the Directive?






(1)  OJ 1992 L 245, p. 6.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration — (Case COMP/M.5501 — GDF SUEZ ENERGY SERVICES/ELYO ITALIA) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy industry, exchange of information, gas supply, merger control








C_2009139EN.01000102.xml










19.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5501 — GDF SUEZ ENERGY SERVICES/ELYO ITALIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 139/02
On 19 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5501. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.