do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 410/2009 of 19 May 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2009124EN.01000101.xml










20.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 124/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 410/2009
of 19 May 2009
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 May 2009.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 May 2009.


For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


73,9 




MA 


42,7 




MK 


72,5 




TN 


101,3 




TR 


88,0 




ZZ 


75,7 




0707 00 05 


EG 


127,4 




MA 


32,7 




TR 


136,7 




ZZ 


98,9 




0709 90 70 


TR 


122,7 




ZZ 


122,7 




0805 10 20 


EG 


41,7 




IL 


57,6 




MA 


42,7 




TN 


49,2 




TR 


107,8 




US 


49,3 




ZA 


56,7 




ZZ 


57,9 




0805 50 10 


AR 


67,3 




TR 


48,0 




ZA 


53,8 




ZZ 


56,4 




0808 10 80 


AR 


98,0 




BR 


73,4 




CL 


82,5 




CN 


90,9 




MK 


42,0 




NZ 


99,4 




US 


124,4 




UY 


71,7 




ZA 


83,2 




ZZ 


85,1 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-166/08: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Büdingen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Guido Weber (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 89/397/EEC — Official control of foodstuffs — Right of those subject to inspection to obtain a second opinion — Concept of person subject to inspection)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: distributor, food inspection, interpretation of the law, labelling, liability, producer's liability, product quality








C_2009205EN.01001502.xml










29.8.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/15





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Büdingen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Guido Weber
(Case C-166/08) (1)

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 89/397/EEC - Official control of foodstuffs - Right of those subject to inspection to obtain a second opinion - Concept of person subject to inspection)
2009/C 205/27
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Büdingen

Criminal proceedings against

Guido Weber

Action

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Büdingen — Interpretation of the second sentence of Article 7(1) of Council Directive 89/397/EEC of 14 June 1989 on the official control of foodstuffs (OJ 1989 L 186, p. 23) — Right of those subject to inspection to obtain a second opinion when an official control of foodstuffs is being carried out — Question whether a person liable under criminal or administrative law for the condition and labelling of a foodstuff is a person ‘subject to inspection’

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 7(1) of Council Directive 89/397/EEC of 14 June 1989 on the official control of foodstuffs is to be interpreted as meaning that a company which has imported and then marketed a foodstuff and whose manager, on the basis of the analysis of samples of that product taken in the retail trade, is to be held responsible by the prosecuting authorities for the condition and labelling of that product in proceedings relating to the imposition of criminal penalties or administrative fines, is to be considered a person ‘subject to inspection’ for the purposes of those provisions.


(1)  OJ C 183, 19.07.2008.
Case C-368/08: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/35/EC — Remedying of environmental damage — Polluter pays principle))
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Greece, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, environmental liability, national implementing measure, polluter pays principle, pollution control measures, prevention of pollution








C_2009153EN.01001602.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/16





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-368/08) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/35/EC - Remedying of environmental damage - ‘Polluter pays’ principle))
2009/C 153/31
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker and I. Dimitriou, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, acting as Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


declares that by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19(1) of that directive;










2.


orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.
Case C-531/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Freedom of establishment — Free movement of capital — Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Public health — Pharmacies — Provisions restricting the right to operate a pharmacy to pharmacists alone — Justification — Reliability and quality of the provision of medicinal products to the public — Professional independence of pharmacists — Undertakings engaged in the distribution of pharmaceutical products — Municipal pharmacies)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, free movement of capital, pharmacy, right of establishment, shareholding








C_2009153EN.01000501.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/5





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
(Case C-531/06) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital - Articles 43 EC and 56 EC - Public health - Pharmacies - Provisions restricting the right to operate a pharmacy to pharmacists alone - Justification - Reliability and quality of the provision of medicinal products to the public - Professional independence of pharmacists - Undertakings engaged in the distribution of pharmaceutical products - Municipal pharmacies)
2009/C 153/09
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by G. Giacomini and E. Boglione, avvocati)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, assisted by G. Fiengo, Agents, avvocato dello Stato)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalou, Agent), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo and F. Díez Moreno, Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, Agents), Republic of Latvia (represented by: E. Balode-Buraka and L. Ostrovska, Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer and T. Kröll, Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Rules governing ownership of pharmacies

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Commission of the European Communities, the Italian Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Austria to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 275/2009 of 2 April 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia ( OJ L 91, 3.4.2009 )
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Liberia, economic resources, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2009123EN.01010001.xml










19.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 123/100







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 275/2009 of 2 April 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 3 April 2009
)

On page 19, Annex, in point 2, under (c):
for:

               ‘Ali Ramadan Kleilat Al-Delby’,
read:

               ‘Ali Ramadhan Kleilat Al-Delbi’.
Joined Cases C-171/07 and C-172/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2009 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes — Germany) — Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Fritz Trennheuser, Deutscher Apothekerverband eV (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07) v Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales (Freedom of establishment — Article 43 EC — Public health — Pharmacies — Provisions restricting the right to operate a pharmacy to pharmacists alone — Justification — Reliability and quality of the provision of medicinal products to the public — Professional independence of pharmacists)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, company with share capital, interpretation of the law, pharmacy, right of establishment








C_2009153EN.01000502.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/5





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2009 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes — Germany) — Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Fritz Trennheuser, Deutscher Apothekerverband eV (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07) v Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales
(Joined Cases C-171/07 and C-172/07) (1)

(Freedom of establishment - Article 43 EC - Public health - Pharmacies - Provisions restricting the right to operate a pharmacy to pharmacists alone - Justification - Reliability and quality of the provision of medicinal products to the public - Professional independence of pharmacists)
2009/C 153/10
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimants: Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Fritz Trennheuser, Deutscher Apothekerverband eV (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07)

Defendants: Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales

Joined party: DocMorris NV

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes — Interpretation of Articles 10 EC, 43 EC and 48 EC — Authorisation to operate pharmacies restricted, under national legislation, to pharmacists who personally manage the pharmacy — Authorisation given by the national authorities to a legal person in view of the direct effect of Community law — Conditions under which national law should be disapplied

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 43 EC and 48 EC do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main actions, which prevents persons not having the status of pharmacist from owning and operating pharmacies.


(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.
Case C-565/07 P: Order of the Court of 19 May 2009 — AMS Advanced Medical Services GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), American Medical Systems, Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative trade mark AMS Advanced Medical Services — Partial refusal of registration — Opposition proceedings — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), appeal, health care, medical device, trade-mark law








C_2009220EN.01001503.xml










12.9.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/15





Order of the Court of 19 May 2009 — AMS Advanced Medical Services GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), American Medical Systems, Inc.
(Case C-565/07 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative trade mark AMS Advanced Medical Services - Partial refusal of registration - Opposition proceedings - Appeal which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
2009/C 220/26
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: AMS Advanced Medical Services GmbH (represented by: S. Schäffler, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent), American Medical Systems, Inc. (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, Rechtsanwälte)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2007 in Case T-425/03 AMS v OHIM — American Medical Systems (AMS Advanced Medical Services), by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the figurative mark ‘AMS Advanced Medical Services’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 10 and 42 against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 September 2003 annulling the decision of the Opposition Division and granting in part the opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘AMS’ — Opposition proceedings — Admissibility of a request to prove the genuine use of the earlier mark made by the applicant for the first time before the Board of Appeal

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by AMS Advanced Medical Services GmbH;










2.


Orders AMS Advanced Medical Services GmbH to pay the costs of the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 64, 08.03.2008.
Case C-181/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 May 2009 — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Bulgaria, admissibility, interpretation of the law, preliminary ruling procedure








C_2009297EN.01001602.xml










5.12.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/16





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 May 2009 — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD
(Case C-181/09)
2009/C 297/20
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha

Defendant: IPN Bulgaria OOD
By decision of 17 September 2009, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) declared the reference for a preliminary ruling to be manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-532/08: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/60/EC — Money laundering and terrorist financing — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: action for failure to fulfil an obligation, financing, limitation of legal proceedings, money laundering, terrorism








C_2009153EN.01001702.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/17





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland
(Case C-532/08) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2005/60/EC - Money laundering and terrorist financing - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
2009/C 153/34
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and A.A. Gilly, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: D. O’Hagan, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ 2005 L 309, p. 15).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;










2.


Orders Ireland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.
Prior notification of a concentration — (Case COMP/M.5480 — Deutsche Bahn/PCC Logistics) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Poland, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, economic concentration, exchange of information, freight rate, logistics, merger control, rail transport








C_2009114EN.01001301.xml










19.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/13





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.5480 — Deutsche Bahn/PCC Logistics)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2009/C 114/08






1.


On 5 May 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bahn Mobility Logistics AG (Germany) belonging to Deutsche Bahn AG (Germany) intends to acquire control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation of the Polish logistics operations conducted through the undertakings PCC Rail S.A., PCC Rail Rybnik S.A. and Trawipol Sp. (together PCC Logistics, Poland) all belonging to PCC SE (Germany) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Deutsche Bahn AG: passenger transport, freight forwarding and logistics (including freight transport) and ancillary services,










—


PCC Logistics: logistic services for railway transportation and freight forwarding (including freight transport) mainly in Poland.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5480 — Deutsche Bahn/PCC Logistics, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Joined Cases T-211/06, T-213/06, T-245/06, T-155/07 and T-178/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 May 2009 — Euro-Information v OHIM (CYBERCREDIT, CYBERGESTION, CYBERGUICHET, CYBERBOURSE and CYBERHOME) (Community trade mark — Applications for Community word marks CYBERCREDIT, CYBERGESTION, CYBERGUICHET, CYBERBOURSE and CYBERHOME — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
Date: 2009-05-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), credit, electronic commerce, trade-mark law








C_2009153EN.01003501.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/35





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 May 2009 — Euro-Information v OHIM (CYBERCREDIT, CYBERGESTION, CYBERGUICHET, CYBERBOURSE and CYBERHOME)
(Joined Cases T-211/06, T-213/06, T-245/06, T-155/07 and T-178/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Applications for Community word marks CYBERCREDIT, CYBERGESTION, CYBERGUICHET, CYBERBOURSE and CYBERHOME - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)
2009/C 153/66
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Européenne de traitement de l’information (Euro-Information) (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: P. Greffe, J. Schouman, A. Jacquet and L. Paudrat, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent.)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 May (Case R 0068/2006-1), 12 June (Case R 0066/2006-1), 5 July 2006 (Case R 0067/2006-1), 28 February (Case R 1046/2006-1) and 15 March 2007 (Case R 0067/2006-1), concerning registration of the signs CYBERGESTION (Case T-213/06), CYBERCREDIT (Case T-211/06), CYBERGUICHET (Case T-245/06), CYBERBOURSE (Case T-155/07) and CYBERHOME (Case T-178/07) as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


The actions are dismissed;










2.


Européenne de traitement de l’information (Euro-Information) is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.