Case C-161/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — Internationaal Verhuis- en Transportbedrijf Jan de Lely BV v Belgische Staat (Free movement of goods — Community transit — Transport operations carried out under cover of a TIR carnet — Offences or irregularities — Notification period — Period within which proof must be furnished of the place where the offence or irregularity was committed)
Date: 2009-05-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, customs debt, customs document, customs regulations, interpretation of the law








C_2009153EN.01001302.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/13





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — Internationaal Verhuis- en Transportbedrijf Jan de Lely BV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-161/08) (1)

(Free movement of goods - Community transit - Transport operations carried out under cover of a TIR carnet - Offences or irregularities - Notification period - Period within which proof must be furnished of the place where the offence or irregularity was committed)
2009/C 153/25
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Internationaal Verhuis- en Transportbedrijf Jan de Lely BV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1593/91 of 12 June 1991 providing for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 719/91 on the use in the Community of TIR carnets and ATA carnets as transit documents (OJ 1991 L 148, p. 11), read in conjunction with Article 11 of the TIR Convention — Offences or irregularities — Notification period

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1593/91 of 12 June 1991 providing for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 719/91 on the use in the Community of TIR carnets and ATA carnets as transit documents, read in conjunction with Article 11(1) of the Customs Convention on the International Transport of Goods under Cover of TIR Carnets, signed in Geneva on 14 November 1975, must be interpreted as meaning that failure to comply with the period within which the holder of a TIR carnet is to be notified of its non-discharge does not have the consequence that the competent customs authorities forfeit the right to recover the duties and taxes due in respect of the international transport of goods made under cover of that carnet.










2.


Article 2(2) and (3) of Regulation No 1593/91, read in conjunction with Article 11(1) and (2) of the Customs Convention on the International Transport of Goods under Cover of TIR Carnets, signed in Geneva on 14 November 1975, must be interpreted as determining only the period within which proof is to be furnished of the regularity of the transport operation, and not the period within which proof must be provided as to the place where the offence or irregularity was committed. It is for the national court to determine, according to the principles of national law on evidence, whether, in the specific case before it and in the light of all the circumstances, that proof was furnished within the period prescribed. However, the national court must determine that period in compliance with Community law and, in particular, must take account of the fact, first, that the period must not be so long as to make it legally and materially impossible to recover the amounts due in another Member State, and, second, that that period must not make it materially impossible for the TIR carnet holder to furnish that proof.






(1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.