do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-133/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 April 2009 — Dr. József Uzonyi. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
Date: 2009-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural production, farmer, interpretation of the law, pay, payment, sugar, sugar beet








C_2009153EN.01002102.xml










4.7.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/21





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 April 2009 — Dr. József Uzonyi. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
(Case C-133/09)
2009/C 153/40
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dr. József Uzonyi

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

Question referred

Does it follow from the provision contained in Article 143ba(1) of Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 (1) in the version in force until 31 December 2006, under which ‘[payment] shall be granted on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria’, that, as regards eligibility for the separate sugar payment in connection with the single area payment, it was not possible to draw a distinction between farmers on the basis of whether they supplied the sugar beet for processing directly (themselves) or indirectly (via intermediaries)?


(1)  Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001; OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, Special Edition in Hungarian, Chapter 3, Volume 40, p. 269-377.
Case T-139/09: Action brought on 8 April 2009 — France v Commission
Date: 2009-04-08
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, France, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, agricultural production, aid to agriculture, fruit vegetable, marketing, national implementing measure








C_2009141EN.01004902.xml










20.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/49





Action brought on 8 April 2009 — France v Commission
(Case T-139/09)
2009/C 141/103
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought







—


Annul Commission Decision C(2009) 2003 final of 28 January 2009 on the contingency plans in the fruit and vegetable sector implemented by France, in so far as it refers to the part of the measures taken under the contingency plans which was financed by sectoral contributions;










—


In the alternative, were the Court to find that application for partial annulment inadmissible, annul Decision C(2009) 2003 final in its entirety;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final (1) of 28 January 2009, by which the Commission declared incompatible with the common market State aids granted by the French Republic to producers of fruit and vegetables under the ‘contingency plans’ aimed at facilitating the marketing of agricultural products harvested in France.
The applicant seeks annulment of the contested decision, to the extent that the Commission found that the measures taken in favour of the producers of fruit and vegetables constituted State aid, whereas those measures were in part financed by voluntary contributions from the producers which do not, according to the applicant, amount to State resources or resources attributable to the State.
In support of its action, the applicant relies on two pleas based on:






—


breach of the obligation to state reasons, to the extent that the Commission did not justify the extension of the finding of State aid to measures financed by voluntary contributions from the producers in the sector concerned;










—


an error of law, since the Commission regarded as State aid measures financed by private resources paid voluntarily and without State intervention. Those measures cannot be regarded as advantages granted through State resources.






(1)  That is the number stated in the contested decision, whereas the applicant consistently refers to the number C(2009) 2003 final.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2009 of 2 April 2009 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase as a feed additive for weaned piglets, chickens for fattening, laying hens, turkeys for fattening and ducks for fattening (holder of the authorisation BASF SE) ( OJ L 91, 3.4.2009 )
Date: 2009-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: animal nutrition, fattening, food additive, laying poultry, market approval, poultry, swine








L_2009094EN.01011201.xml










8.4.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 94/112







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2009 of 2 April 2009 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase as a feed additive for weaned piglets, chickens for fattening, laying hens, turkeys for fattening and ducks for fattening (holder of the authorisation BASF SE)
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 3 April 2009
)

On page 6, in the Annex, column 7 ‘Minimum content’, the unit ‘TXT’ should be ‘TXU’.