do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 252/2009 of 25 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

26.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 252/2009

of 25 March 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 March 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 March 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 80/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

26.3.2009

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0709 90 80

0805 10 20

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

IL
JO
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

JO
MA
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

EG
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

TR
ZZ

AR
BR
CA
CL
CN
MK
US
UY
ZA
ZZ

AR
CL
CN
ZA
ZZ

82,5
73,2
62,5
134,4
103,9
91,3

167,2
69,5
170,8
135,8

52,1
96,8
74,5

60,4
60,4

41,1
55,3
47,0
59,0
73,6
55,2

56,6
56,6

87,1
75,0
63,9
81,9
67,5
21,2
109,5
68,8
79,1
72,7

76,7
90,6
48,8
90,2
76,6

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Portugal, State aid, control of State aid, exchange of information, fishing industry, small and medium-sized enterprises

25.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/13

II

(Information)

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

COMMISSION

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 71/03)

Date of adoption of the decision

19.12.2008

Reference number of the aid

Member State

Region

N 98/07

Portugal

Região Autónoma dos Açores

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) Regime de apoio à pesca artesanal e costeira, para construção e modernização

de navios de pesca

Legal basis

Projecto de Portaria da Região Autónoma dos Açores, relativo à gestão da frota
de pesca

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Form of aid

Aid for the construction and modernisation of fishing vessels

Direct grant

Budget appropriations

EUR 17,5 million

Maximum aid intensity

50 %/40 %

Duration

Period of application of the European Fisheries Fund — until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Fisheries

Name and address of
authority

the granting

Governo Regional dos Açores — Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e do Mar
Edifício do Relógio — Rua Cônsul Dabney
9900-014 Horta (Açores)
PORTUGAL

Other information

Application report

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be
found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

C 71/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

25.3.2009

Date of adoption of the decision

9.2.2009

Reference number of the aid

N 102/08

Member State

Region

Belgium

Het Vlaamse Gewest

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) VINNOF

Legal basis

Beslissing Vlaamse Regering van 29 april 2005 met betrekking tot de oprichting
van het Vlaams Innovatiefonds — Decreet van 13 juli 1994 betreffende de
Vlaamse investeringsmaatschappijen, laatst gewijzigd bij decreet van 6 juli 2001/
Décision du gouvernement flamand du 29 avril 2005 portant création du Fonds
d'innovation flamand — décret du 13 juillet 1994 relatif aux sociétés d'investis-
sement flamandes, modifié en dernier lieu par le décret du 6 juillet 2001

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Form of aid

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Innovation, Small and medium-sized enterprises

Provision of risk capital, Soft loan

Overall budget: EUR 150 million

—

Until 31.12.2015

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of
authority

the granting

Vlaams Innovatiefonds Comm. VA (VINNOF)
Hooikaai 55
1000 Brussel
BELGIË

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be
found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/
Case T-343/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — allsafe Jungfalk v OHIM (ALLSAFE) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark ALLSAFE — Absolute grounds for refusal of registration — Absence of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, Germany, action for annulment (EU), carriage of goods, trade-mark law








C_2009113EN.01003402.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/34





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — allsafe Jungfalk v OHIM (ALLSAFE)
(Case T-343/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark ALLSAFE - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration - Absence of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
2009/C 113/70
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: allsafe Jungfalk GmbH & Co. KG (Engen, Germany) (represented by: P. Mes, J. Bühling, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, A. Verhauwen, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt and M. Bergermann, lawyers)

Defendants: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 July 2007 (Case R 454/2006-4) concerning the registration of the word sign ALLSAFE as a community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders allsafe Jungfalk GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.
Case T-402/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Kaul v OHIM — Bayer (ARCOL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ARCOL — Earlier Community word mark CAPOL — Implementation by OHIM of a judgment annulling a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rights of the defence — Article 8(1)(b), Article 61(2), Article 63(6), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), chemical product, trade-mark law








C_2009113EN.01003501.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/35





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Kaul v OHIM — Bayer (ARCOL)
(Case T-402/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark ARCOL - Earlier Community word mark CAPOL - Implementation by OHIM of a judgment annulling a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Rights of the defence - Article 8(1)(b), Article 61(2), Article 63(6), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
2009/C 113/71
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kaul GmbH (Elmshorn, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 August 2007 (Case R 782/2000-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Kaul GmbH and Bayer AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kaul GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.
Case T-125/07: Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Scientific and Technological Committee of AGH and Others v Commission (Proceedings for failure to act — Technologies for subterranean storage of carbon dioxide — Commission’s failure to adopt a position — Inadmissbility)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EC action to establish liability, European Commissioner, General Court (EU), Poland, environmental protection, greenhouse gas, public safety, storage








C_2009129EN.01001303.xml










6.6.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/13





Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Scientific and Technological Committee of AGH and Others v Commission
(Case T-125/07) (1)

(Proceedings for failure to act - Technologies for subterranean storage of carbon dioxide - Commission’s failure to adopt a position - Inadmissbility)
2009/C 129/23
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicants: Scientific and Technological Committee of AGH University of Science and Technology (Krakow, Poland); Europejskie Stowarzyszenie Ochrony Środowiska (Krakow); Przedsiębiorstwo Usług Geologiczno — Wiertniczych Chemkop-Geowiert sp. z o.o. (Krakow); Stowarzyszenie Obrony Środowiska (Krakow); Fundacja Partnerstwo dla Środowiska (Krakow); Niezależne Forum Ochrony Biosfery Ziemi (Skawina, Poland); Jan Adamczyk (Krakow); Emanuel Lipartowski (Krakow) (represented by: A. Żuraniewski, and subsequently by: M. Rogoziński and B. Balcerzak, lawyers),

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and M. Kaduczak, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for failure to act, seeking a declaration that members of the Commission unlawfully failed to take appropriate measures, following the complaints made by the applicants, to eliminate the harmful effects on human health and the environment of techniques of capture and underground storage of carbon dioxide partly financed by the European Union

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Scientific and Technological Committee of AGH University of Science and Technology; Europejskie Stowarzyszenie Ochrony Środowiska; Przedsiębiorstwo Usług Geologiczno — Wiertniczych Chemkop-Geowiert sp. z o.o.; Stowarzyszenie Obrony Środowiska; Fundacja Partnerstwo dla Środowiska; Niezależne Forum Ochrony Biosfery Ziemi; Mr Jan Adamczyk and Mr Emanuel Lipartowski are ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.
Case T-21/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPALINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark SPALINE — Earlier national word mark SPA — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Unfair advantage derived from the reputation of the earlier mark — Use of the mark applied for without due cause — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), cosmetic product, trade-mark law








C_2009113EN.01003302.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/33





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPALINE)
(Case T-21/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark SPALINE - Earlier national word mark SPA - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Unfair advantage derived from the reputation of the earlier mark - Use of the mark applied for without due cause - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
2009/C 113/67
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: L’Oréal SA (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Baud, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: E. Cornu, L. De Brouwer, D. Moreau and E. De Gryse, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 October 2006 (Case R 415/2005-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and L’Oréal SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders L’Oréal SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.
Case C-114/09: Action brought on 25 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, legislation, public limited company








C_2009113EN.01002801.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/28





Action brought on 25 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain
(Case C-114/09)
2009/C 113/51
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Adsera Ribera and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Form of order sought







—


Declare that by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/68/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 amending Council Directive 77/91/EEC (2) as regards the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, or in any event, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.










—


Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period laid down for the transposition of Directive 2006/68/EC into national law ended on 15 April 2008.


(1)  OJ L 264, p. 32

(2)  OJ L 26, p.1
Case T-109/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPA THERAPY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark SPA THERAPY — Earlier national word mark SPA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), aromatic plant, cosmetic product, health care, trade-mark law








C_2009113EN.01003303.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/33





Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPA THERAPY)
(Case T-109/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark SPA THERAPY - Earlier national word mark SPA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
2009/C 113/68
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: L’Oréal SA (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Baud, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: E. Cornu, L. De Brouwer and D. Moreau, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 January 2007 (Case R 468/2005-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and L’Oréal SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders L’Oréal SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5468 — GDF Suez/GEK) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, energy production, energy storage, exchange of information, gas supply, merger control, property market, waste management, water management

25.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/15

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5470 — Gilde/Plukon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 71/04)

On 17 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC)
No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5470. EUR-Lex is the

on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5468 — GDF Suez/GEK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 71/05)

On 19 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC)
No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5468. EUR-Lex is the

on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).
2009/303/EC,Euratom: Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 25 March 2009 appointing two Judges to the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Date: 2009-03-25
Institutions: Representatives of the Governments of the Member States
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/43

CONFERENCE OF THE REPRESENTATIVES
OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 25 March 2009

appointing two Judges to the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(2009/303/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

(4)

Having regard to the Treaty
Community, and in particular Article 223 thereof,

establishing the European

Justice of

To complete the partial replacement of the Judges of the
Court of
the
Governments of the Member States should appoint two
further Judges, whose current term of office expires on
6 October 2009,

the European Communities,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic
Energy Community, and in particular Article 139 thereof,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

In accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, every
three years there should be a partial replacement of the
Judges and Advocates-General of the Court of Justice of
the European Communities.

For the period from 7 October 2009 to 6 October 2015,
13 Judges and four Advocates-General had to be
appointed.

the Governments of

On 25 February 2009, the Conference of the Represen­
tatives of
the Member States
appointed 11 Judges and four Advocates-General to the
Court of Justice of the European Communities for the
above period.

Article 1

Mr Marko ILEŠIČ and Ms Camelia TOADER are hereby appointed
Judges to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for
the period from 7 October 2009 to 6 October 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the
European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 March 2009.

The President

M. VICENOVÁ