do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 185/2009 of 9 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-03-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, export price, fruit vegetable, pip fruit

10.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 185/2009

of 9 March 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 March 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 64/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

10.3.2009

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0709 90 80

0805 10 20

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

IL
JO
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

EG
JO
MA
MK
TR
ZZ

JO
MA
TR
ZZ

EG
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

EG
MA
TR
ZZ

AR
CA
CL
CN
MK
US
ZZ

AR
CL
CN
US
ZA
ZZ

148,7
82,9
77,5
131,6
91,8
106,5

147,3
166,9
93,4
133,4
162,6
140,7

249,0
58,0
102,1
136,4

96,9
96,9

44,1
58,6
48,6
48,9
61,8
52,4

51,3
61,0
51,7
54,7

109,0
86,3
97,4
81,6
22,7
112,3
84,9

86,9
109,2
54,9
104,6
96,2
90,4

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Case F-22/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Marie-Hélène Willigens v Council
Date: 2009-03-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European official, action for annulment (EU), promotion








C_2009113EN.01004702.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/47





Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Marie-Hélène Willigens v Council
(Case F-22/09)
2009/C 113/100
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Marie-Hélène Willigens (Glabais, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.
Case F-20/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Juvyns v Council
Date: 2009-03-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European official, action for annulment (EU), promotion








C_2009113EN.01004604.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/46





Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Juvyns v Council
(Case F-20/09)
2009/C 113/98
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Marc Juvyns (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.
Case F-21/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — De Benedetti-Dagnoni v Council
Date: 2009-03-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European official, action for annulment (EU), promotion








C_2009113EN.01004701.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/47





Action brought on 9 March 2009 — De Benedetti-Dagnoni v Council
(Case F-21/09)
2009/C 113/99
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Rosangela De Benedetti-Dagnoni (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.