do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 165/2009 of 27 February 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

28.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 165/2009

of 27 February 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 February 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 56/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.2.2009

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0709 90 80

0805 10 20

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

MA
SN
TN
TR
ZZ

MA
MK
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

EG
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

IL
MA
TR
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
PK
TR
ZZ

EG
MA
TR
ZZ

CA
CN
MK
US
ZZ

AR
CL
CN
US
ZA
ZZ

59,1
127,1
111,3
82,5
95,0

102,4
143,3
119,8
121,8

58,9
103,6
81,3

80,1
80,1

44,4
50,1
49,8
56,6
73,1
54,8

144,6
85,0
71,0
100,2

79,0
107,0
134,0
51,7
64,1
87,2

52,8
53,1
49,2
51,7

89,6
76,7
25,7
107,5
74,9

85,0
73,7
44,5
109,3
105,3
83,6

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5471 — Goldman Sachs/Constellation Energy Commodities) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: bank, coal, economic concentration, exchange of information, freight rate, investment, marketing, merger control, property market

27.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

II

(Information)

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

COMMISSION

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5471 — Goldman Sachs/Constellation Energy Commodities)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 48/01)

On 23 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5471. EUR-Lex is the

on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

C 48/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.2.2009

IV

(Notices)

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND
BODIES

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 February 2009

(2009/C 48/02)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

PLN

RON

TRY

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Polish zloty

Romanian leu

Turkish lira

1,2782

AUD Australian dollar

125,33

7,4499

0,89130

11,3175

CAD

HKD

NZD

SGD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

New Zealand dollar

Singapore dollar

1,9590

1,5885

9,9108

2,4953

1,9633

1,4848

KRW South Korean won

1 931,75

8,7780

1,9558

28,333

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

Indonesian rupiah

15,6466

MYR Malaysian ringgit

300,02

3,4528

0,7094

4,6960

4,2904

2,1580

PHP

RUB

THB

BRL

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

Brazilian real

MXN Mexican peso

INR

Indian rupee

12,6350

8,7429

7,3860

15 386,97

4,6916

61,900

45,5350

45,939

3,0144

19,0420

64,4150

(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-17/09: Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Meister v OHIM
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), infringement of EU law, personnel administration








C_2009113EN.01004601.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/46





Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Meister v OHIM
(Case F-17/09)
2009/C 113/95
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Herbert E. Meister (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the dismissal of the applicant’s complaint regarding the calculation of promotion points for the year 2008 and application for damages for infringement of the principles of proper personnel management

Form of order sought







—


Annul the negative decision of the president of 20 December 2008 taken in relation to the internal complaint brought by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of 20 August 2008;










—


order the defendant to pay damages to the applicant, of an amount to be determined by the court;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 March 2009 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, interest

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for
27 Member States applicable as from 1 March 2009

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004,
p. 1))

(2009/C 48/03)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the
method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the
reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the
discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation
(EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees
that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding
100 basis points to the base rate.

From

1.3.2009

To

…

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

3,47 3,47 7,63 3,47 3,74 3,47 6,00 7,34 3,47 3,47 3,47 3,47 10,01 3,47 3,47 9,53 3,47 13,20 3,47 3,47 6,78 3,47 17,29 3,31 3,47 3,47 3,58

1.2.2009

28.2.2009

4,99 4,99 7,63 4,99 4,53 4,99 6,00 7,34 4,99 4,99 4,99 4,99 10,01 4,99 4,99 7,81 4,99 13,20 4,99 4,99 6,78 4,99 17,29 4,31 4,99 4,99 4,81

1.1.2009

31.1.2009

4,99 4,99 7,63 4,99 4,53 4,99 6,00 7,34 4,99 4,99 4,99 4,99 10,01 4,99 4,99 7,81 4,99 11,05 4,99 4,99 6,78 4,99 17,29 5,18 4,99 4,99 5,70

1.12.2008

31.12.2008

5,36 5,36 6,70 5,36 4,20 5,36 5,55 6,43 5,36 5,36 5,36 5,36 8,58 5,36 5,36 7,10 5,36 9,44 5,36 5,36 6,42 5,36 15,87 5,49 5,36 5,00 5,66

1.11.2008

30.11.2008

5,36 5,36 6,70 5,36 4,20 5,36 5,55 6,43 5,36 5,36 5,36 5,36 8,58 5,36 5,36 6,10 5,36 9,44 5,36 5,36 6,42 5,36 11,02 5,49 5,36 5,00 5,66

1.10.2008

31.10.2008

5,36 5,36 6,70 5,36 4,20 5,36 5,55 6,43 5,36 5,36 5,36 5,36 8,58 5,36 5,36 6,10 5,36 9,44 5,36 5,36 6,42 5,36 11,02 5,49 5,36 4,34 5,66

1.9.2008

30.9.2008

4,59 4,59 6,70 4,59 4,20 4,59 5,55 6,43 4,59 4,59 4,59 4,59 8,58 4,59 4,59 6,10 4,59 9,44 4,59 4,59 6,42 4,59 11,02 5,49 4,59 4,34 5,66

1.7.2008

31.8.2008

4,59 4,59 6,70 4,59 4,20 4,59 4,81 6,43 4,59 4,59 4,59 4,59 8,58 4,59 4,59 6,10 4,59 9,44 4,59 4,59 6,42 4,59 11,02 4,75 4,59 4,34 5,66

.

.

2
7
2
2
0
0
9

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
o
n

i

C

4
8
/
3
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 142/2009 of 19 February 2009 fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 ( OJ L 49, 20.2.2009 )
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: award of contract, export refund, skimmed milk powder

27.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/45

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 142/2009 of 19 February 2009 fixing the maximum export
refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in
Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

(Official Journal of the European Union L 49 of 20 February 2009)

On page 9, Article 1 should read as follows:

‘Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on
17 February 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(c) and in
Article 2 of that Regulation shall be EUR 21,98/100 kg.’.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5455 — TPV/Philips Branded Monitors) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: computer equipment, display, economic concentration, exchange of information, marketing, merger control, screen, technology, traffic signs

27.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/27

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5455 — TPV/Philips Branded Monitors)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 48/07)

1.
On 20 February 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant
to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking TPV Technology Limited
(‘TPV’, Bermuda) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the
whole of the undertaking MMD — Monitors & Displays Holding BV (‘Philips Holdco’, The Netherlands),
currently controlled by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (‘Philips’, The Netherlands), by way of purchase
of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for TPV: solutions provider in monitor display technology; design and production of a wide range of

computer monitors for distribution in Asia, Europe and the United States,

— for Philips Holdco: branding and distribution of computer monitors and public signage.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the

3.
scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed

4.
operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under
reference number COMP/M.5455 — TPV/Philips Branded Monitors, to the following address:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Merger Registry
J-70
B-1049 Brussels

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-90/09: Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Mojo Concerts and Amsterdam Music Dome Explotatie v Commission of the European Communities
Date: 2009-02-27
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Netherlands, access to information, action for annulment (EU), confidentiality, data processing, investment








C_2009102EN.01003101.xml










1.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/31





Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Mojo Concerts and Amsterdam Music Dome Explotatie v Commission of the European Communities
(Case T-90/09)
2009/C 102/46
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicants: Mojo Concerts BV (Delft, Netherlands) and Amsterdam Music Dome Explotatie BV (Delft, Netherlands) (represented by S. Beeston, Lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought







—


Annul the contested decision;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek the annulment of the Commission Decision of 21 October 2008 on the investment of the municipality of Rotterdam in the Ahoy complex (State aid C 4/2008 (ex N 97/2007, ex CP 91/2007).
They submit that the Commission’s reasoning in the contested decision discloses a manifestly incorrect assessment and that the steps in the reasoning are incorrect and/or inadequately substantiated.
First, the applicants argue that the value of the rent and of the shares in Ahoy which have been established are not in accordance with market value. Furthermore, an investment which only leads to value retention can indeed produce an advantage. Moreover, when determining the value of the rent and of the shares, no account was taken of the investment. According to the applicants, the contractual restrictions between the municipality and the operator would not prevent the investment from producing added value. Finally, the benefit-sharing arrangement does not provide an additional guarantee of the market conformity of the transactions.
The applicants also allege breach of procedure and defective reasoning: the arguments submitted by them were not, or only inadequately, taken into consideration by the Commission in the contested decision; parts of the file were wrongly classified as confidential; and the applicants were not informed of all the elements in the file, which constitutes an infringement of the right to be heard.