Case F-38/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 17 February 2009 — Liotti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Career development report — 2006 appraisal procedure — Appraisal rules applied by the reporting officers)
Date: 2009-02-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Civil Service Tribunal, European Commission, European official, action by staff, promotion, regulations for civil servants

C 82/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

4.4.2009

EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of
17 February 2009 — Liotti v Commission

(Case F-38/08) (1)

(Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Career development
report — 2006 appraisal procedure — Appraisal rules applied
by the reporting officers)

(2009/C 82/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Amerigo Liotti (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (repre-
sented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Re:

The annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision not to
include the applicant on the list of those promoted to grade
AST 11 under the 2007 promotion procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Annuls the decisions of 16 July 2007 and of 5 February 2008 by
the European Union refused to promote

which the Council of
Mr Stols to grade AST 11 under the 2007 promotion procedure;

2. Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: B. Eggers and K. Herrmann, Agents)

(1) OJ C 183, 19.7.2008, p. 34.

Re:

Annulment of
respect of 2006.

the applicant's career development report

in

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls Mr Liotti's career development report
period from 1 January to 31 December 2006;

in respect of

the

2. Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the

costs.

(1) OJ C 158, 21.6.2008, p. 26.

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of
17 February 2009 — Stols v Council

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of
3 February 2009 — Cavalhal Garcia v Council

(Case F-40/08) (1)

(Staff case — Former officials — Remuneration — Education
allowance — Refusal to grant — Action out of time — Mani-
fest inadmissibility)

(2009/C 82/64)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Daniela Paula Cavalhal Garcia (Sines, Portugal) (repre-
sented by: Antas da Cunha, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.
Bauer and J. Monteiro, Agents)

(Case F-51/08) (1)

Re:

(Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2007 promotion
procedure — Consideration of comparative merits — Manifest
error of assessment)

Annulment of the Council's decision removing the right to the
education allowance as regards the applicant's daughter.

(2009/C 82/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Ms Carvalhal Garcia is to pay all the costs.

Applicant: Willem Stols (Halsteren, Netherlands) (represented by:
S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

(1) OJ C 183, 19.7.2008, p. 33.

Defendant: Council of
Mr Bauer and Ms Balta, Agents)

the European Union (represented by: