do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 95/2009 of 2 February 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-02-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 33/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 95/2009

of 2 February 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 February 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 33/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

3.2.2009

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0709 90 80

0805 10 20

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

JO
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

JO
MA
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

EG
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

IL
MA
TR
ZZ

CN
IL
JM
PK
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

CA
CL
CN
MK
US
ZZ

CL
CN
TR
US
ZA
ZZ

71,2
46,7
129,8
113,5
90,3

167,2
105,6
177,5
150,1

126,0
118,0
122,0

82,9
82,9

51,5
50,4
56,1
42,1
58,1
51,6

190,1
88,0
63,0
113,7

70,2
78,6
75,5
73,9
64,2
72,5

51,7
49,1
50,4

86,3
67,8
66,2
31,6
109,3
72,2

71,6
33,7
40,0
105,6
88,5
67,9

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 98/2009 of 2 February 2009 entering certain names in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Aceite de La Alcarria (PDO), Radicchio di Verona (PGI), Zafferano di Sardegna (PDO), Huîtres Marennes Oléron (PGI))
Date: 2009-02-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: animal oil, designation of origin, fruit vegetable, location of production, milk product, mollusc, pastry-making, product designation, sea fish, shellfish farming

L 33/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

3.2.2009

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 98/2009

of 2 February 2009

entering certain names in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical
indications (Aceite de La Alcarria (PDO), Radicchio di Verona (PGI), Zafferano di Sardegna (PDO),
Huîtres Marennes Oléron (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of
20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications
and designations of origin for agricultural products and food­
stuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4)
thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2)
of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to
register the name ‘Aceite de La Alcarria’,
Italy’s appli­
cations to register the names ‘Radicchio di Verona’ and
‘Zafferano di Sardegna’, and France’s application to

register the name ‘Huîtres Marennes Oléron’ have been
published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

(2)

As no objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No
510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these
names should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names contained in the Annex to this Regulation are
hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following
its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL
Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2) OJ C 112, 7.5.2008, p. 39 (Aceite de La Alcarria), OJ C 114,
9.5.2008, p. 11 (Radicchio di Verona), OJ C 117, 14.5.2008,
p. 39 (Zafferano di Sardegna), OJ C 118, 15.5.2008, p. 35
(Huîtres Marennes Oléron).

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 33/9

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

ANNEX

Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

SPAIN

Aceite de La Alcarria (PDO)

Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Radicchio di Verona (PGI)

Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

FRANCE

Huîtres Marennes Oléron (PGI)

Class 1.8. Other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

ITALY

Zafferano di Sardegna (PDO)
Case C-49/09: Action brought on 2 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
Date: 2009-02-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Community acquis, Poland, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, clothing industry, early childhood








C_2009102EN.01001101.xml










1.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/11





Action brought on 2 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
(Case C-49/09)
2009/C 102/15
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by applying a reduced VAT rate of 7 % to supplies, the import and the intra-Community acquisition of clothing and clothing accessories for babies and of children’s footwear on the basis of Article 41(2) of the Law on Goods and Services Tax (ustawa o podatku od towarów i usług) of 11 March 2004, in conjunction with items 45 and 47 of Annex III to that Law, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 98 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) in conjunction with Annex III thereto;










—


order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In the applicant’s view, the Republic of Poland’s application of a reduced VAT rate of 7% to supplies, the import and the intra-Community acquisition of clothing and clothing accessories for babies and of children’s footwear on the basis of Article 41(2) of the Law on Goods and Services Tax of 11 March 2004, in conjunction with items 45 and 47 of Annex III to that Law, is contrary to the explicit provisions of Article 98 of Directive 2006/112/EC. Application of that reduced rate to the abovementioned goods is not covered by any derogation accorded to the Republic of Poland in point 1(a) and (b) of Chapter 9 (‘Taxation’) of Annex XII to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Poland to the European Union or in Article 128 of Directive 2006/112/EC.


(1)  OJ No L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
Case C-408/07: Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 2 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Brigitte Ruf, née Elsässer, Gertrud Elsässer, née Sommer v European Central Bank (ECB), Coop Himmelblau Prix, Dreibholz & Partner ZT GmbH; intervener: the City of Frankfurt am Main
Date: 2009-02-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, Germany, interpretation of the law, trade-mark law








C_2009113EN.01002802.xml










16.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/28





Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 2 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Brigitte Ruf, née Elsässer, Gertrud Elsässer, née Sommer v European Central Bank (ECB), Coop Himmelblau Prix, Dreibholz & Partner ZT GmbH; intervener: the City of Frankfurt am Main
(Case C-408/07) (1)

2009/C 113/52

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.
Case F-6/09: Action brought on 2 February 2009 — Fares v Commission
Date: 2009-02-02
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), decision, fine

C 69/54

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

21.3.2009

EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Action brought on 12 December 2008 — Di Prospero v
Commission

Form of order sought

(Case F-99/08)

(2009/C 69/119)

Language of the case: French

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority of 11 April

2008 and 21 October 2008;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

pay the costs.

Parties

Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Uccle, Belgium) (represented by: S.
Rodriguez and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of EPSO's decision not to accept the applicant's
application for competition EPSO/AD/117/08

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Annul

the decision of

the European Personnel Selection
Office (EPSO) not to have allowed the applicant to submit
an application for competition EPSO/AD/117/08;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

pay the costs.

Action brought on 21 January 2009 — De Britto
Patricio-Dias v Commission

(Case F-4/09)

(2009/C 69/120)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant:
(represented by: L. Massaux, lawyer)

Jorge De Britto Patricio-Dias

(Brussels, Belgium)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to reassign the appli-
cant to unit TREN.B.3

Action brought on 2 February 2009 — Fares v
Commission

(Case F-6/09)

(2009/C 69/121)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Soukaïna Fares
(represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

(Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to classify the appli-
cant in function group III, grade 8.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Tribunal should:

— Annul the decision adopted by the Authority Authorised to
Conclude Contracts on 17 October, by which it rejected the
complaint brought by the applicant on 21 June 2008
seeking annulment of the decision classifying the applicant
in function group III, at grade 8, and applying for entitle-
ment for classification at grade 9, with effect on the same
date;

— So far as necessary, also annul the original decision, by
which the applicant was classified in function group III, at
grade 8;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

pay the costs.