Case F-2/09: Action brought on 19 January 2009 — Menghi v ENISA
Date: 2009-01-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, action for annulment (EU), health expenditure, staff assessment, traineeship, work contract

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/53

— order the defendant to pay to the applicant, by way of
compensation for the damage arising from the failure physi-
cally to destroy the documentation, with effect
from
tomorrow until the day on which the documentation is
physically destroyed, the sum of EUR 100 per day, or such
greater or lesser sum as the Tribunal may consider fair and
just;

— order the defendant to pay to the applicant, by way of
compensation for the damage arising from the failure to
restore the applicant's personal effects to him, with effect
from tomorrow until
the day on which the effects are
restored, the sum of EUR 100 per day, or such greater or
lesser sum as the Tribunal may consider fair and just;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Action brought on 19 January 2009 — Menghi v ENISA

(Case F-2/09)

(2009/C 55/97)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Achille Menghi
Defalque, lawyer)

(Cagliari,

Italy)

(represented by: L.

Defendant: European Network and Information Security Agency

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to confirm the applicant's
contract after the probationary period and an application for
compensation for the material and non-material harm suffered.

Action brought on 9 January 2009 — Putterie-de-Beukelaer
v Commission

Form of order sought

(Case F-1/09)

(2009/C 55/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Françoise Putterie-de-Beukelaer
(represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

(Brussels, Belgium)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the
2007 attestation procedure.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Annul the Appointing Authority's decision of 30 September
2008 to reject the applicant's complaint relating to the deci-
sion that her application for the 2007 attestation procedure
was inadmissible;

— Annul the Appointing Authority's decision that her applica-
tion for the 2007 attestation procedure was inadmissible;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Annul the decision of 3 October 2008 rejecting the appli-
cant's complaint relating to the decision of the authority
authorised to conclude
employment of
14 March 2008 not to confirm the applicant's contract;

contracts of

— Consequently, annul the decision of the authority authorised
to conclude contracts of employment of 14 March 2008
not to confirm the applicant's contract;

— Order the authority authorised to conclude contracts of
employment to pay compensation to the applicant for the
financial harm caused by the failure to confirm his three
year contract of employment, the financial harm caused as a
result of the medical expenses which he had to incur and
the non-material harm suffered on account of psychological
harassment;

— Order

the European Network and Information Security

Agency to pay the costs.

Action brought on 16 January 2009 — Ridolfi v
Commission

(Case F-3/09)

(2009/C 55/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Ridolfi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N.
Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities