do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 17/2009 of 12 January 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2009-01-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common agricultural policy, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

13.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 17/2009

of 12 January 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 January 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 8/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

13.1.2009

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 10 20

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

MA
TN
TR
ZZ

JO
MA
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TR
ZA
ZZ

MA
ZZ

CN
IL
TR
ZZ

EG
MA
TR
ZZ

CA
CN
MK
US
ZZ

CN
US
ZZ

52,1
134,4
125,7
104,1

167,2
110,0
151,4
142,9

87,6
113,3
100,5

53,0
55,0
62,8
77,9
44,1
58,6

65,7
65,7

55,3
70,0
52,7
59,3

47,1
57,3
56,4
53,6

87,4
95,7
35,0
114,6
83,2

57,4
115,7
86,6

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-14/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 January 2009 — Hava Genc v Land Berlin
Date: 2009-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Türkiye, free movement of workers, interpretation of the law, labour law, remuneration of work








C_2009102EN.01001001.xml










1.5.2009   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/10





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 January 2009 — Hava Genc v Land Berlin
(Case C-14/09)
2009/C 102/13
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Hava Genc

Defendant: Land Berlin

Questions referred







1.


Is a Turkish national who is duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State and who has, for an extended period for and under the instruction of another, performed services of a certain economic value in return for which he receives remuneration a ‘worker’ for the purposes of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC/Turkey Association Council, even if the time spent in that activity amounts to only approximately 14% of the collectively agreed working time of a full-time worker (in the present case, 5.5 hours as against a 39-hour working week) and the income earned from that activity by itself covers only approximately 25% of the amount determined under the national law of the Member State to be necessary for subsistence (in the present case, approximately EUR 175 as against approximately EUR 715)?
If the answer to the first question is affirmative:










2.


Can a Turkish national then also rely on the freedom of movement under the EEC/Turkey Association as a worker within the terms of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 if the purpose of the stay for which he entered the country is no longer applicable (in the present case, joining a spouse for the purpose of family reunification), if there are no other interests for remaining in the contracting State which merit protection, and if the possibility of continuing to engage in a minimal activity in the contracting State cannot be regarded as constituting a ground for remaining there, in particular because no serious efforts have been made by that Turkish national to achieve stable economic integration without reliance on social benefits to ensure the means of subsistence?