Case C-583/08 P: Appeal brought on 24 December 2008 by Christos Gogos against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) on 15 October 2008 in Case T-66/04 Christos Gogos v Commission of the European Communities
Date: 2008-12-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Community, administrative competition, appeal, appointment of staff, civil servant, civil service, damage

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/39

Pleas in law and main arguments

the transposition of Directive 2006/70/EC
The period for
expired on 15 December 2007. However, at
the time the
present action was brought, the defendant had not adopted all
the necessary implementing measures or, in any event, had not
at that time informed the Commission thereof.

(1) OJ 2006 L 214, p. 29.

Appeal brought on 24 December 2008 by Christos Gogos
against
the judgment delivered by the Court of First
Instance (Seventh Chamber) on 15 October 2008 in Case
T-66/04 Christos Gogos v Commission of the European
Communities

(Case C-583/08 P)

(2009/C 44/67)

Language of the case: Greek

Action brought on 22 December 2008 — Commission of
the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-575/08)

(2009/C 44/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Form of order sought

— declare that in failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive
2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of
limited
liability companies (1) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to
fulfil its obligations under that directive;

— order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for the transposition of Directive 2005/56/EC
expired on 14 December 2007. At the date of filing of the
present action, the defendant had not adopted all the necessary
implementing measures or, in any event, had not yet communi-
cated those measures to the Commission.

(1) OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1.

Parties

Appellant: Christos Gogos (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and
P. Katsimani, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of
Communities

the European

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

— set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance;

— annul the decision placing him in Grade A 7 and the deci-
sion of 24 November 2003 rejecting his administrative
complaint;

— exercise its unlimited jurisdiction and award compensation
totalling EUR 538 121,79 in respect of
the economic
damage which results from the Commission's unlawful
conduct
issue, and
in adopting the harmful decision at
which has been aggravated by the administrative reform for
the remainder of his expected life;

— award compensation totalling EUR 50 000 for the long

delay in delivery of the judgment at first instance;

— order the defendant to pay the appellant's costs in respect of
both the case before the Court of First Instance and the
present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In his appeal against the judgment of 15 October 2008 in Case
T-66/04 Christos Gogos v Commission of the European Communities,
the appellant Christos Gogos puts forward, first of all, two pleas
to substantiate his claim that the judgment of the Court of First
Instance should be set aside.

the appellant complains of

First,
reasoning in respect of five of
which he put forward as applicant.

insufficient and mistaken
the six pleas for annulment

Secondly, the appellant submits that the length of the proceed-
ings before the Court of First Instance is not justified by objec-
tive reasons. Furthermore, he has been harmed economically
and has suffered non-material damage because of that delay.