Case T-433/08 R: Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 20 November 2008 — SIAE v Commission (Application for interim measures — Commission decision ordering the cessation of a concerted practice in relation to the collective management of copyright — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2008-11-20
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for annulment (EU), copyright, data transmission, export licence, principle of proportionality, regional planning, satellite communications, summary procedure

C 32/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

7.2.2009

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Article 3 of Commission
Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a
proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of
the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. Costs are reserved.

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of
5 December 2008 — KODA v Commission

(Case T-425/08 R)

(Applications for interim measures — Commission decision
ordering the cessation of a concerted practice in connection
with the collective management of copyright — Application
for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

(2009/C 32/70)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: KODA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
K. Dyekjær and J. Borum, lawyers)

(represented by:

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of
14 November 2008 — GEMA v Commission

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and N. Rasmussen, Agents)

(Case T-410/08 R)

Re:

(Application for interim measures — Commission decision
ordering the cessation of a concerted practice in relation to the
collective management of copyright — Application for suspen-
sion of operation of a measure — No urgency)

(2009/C 32/69)

Application for suspension of operation of Article 4(2) and (3)
of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008
relating to a proceeding pursuant
to Article 81 EC and
Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Language of the case: German

Operative part of the order

Parties

Applicant: Gesellschaft
für musikalische Aufführungs- und
mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA) (Berlin, Germany)
(represented by: R. Bechtold and I. Brinker, lawyers, assisted by
Professor J. Schwarze)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, O. Weber and A. Antoniadis,
Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the combined provi-
sions of Articles 3 and 4(2) and (3) of Commission Decision
C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding
under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case
COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC) in so far as they concern the appli-
cant.

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The costs are reserved.

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of
20 November 2008 — SIAE v Commission

(Case T-433/08 R)

(Application for interim measures — Commission decision
ordering the cessation of a concerted practice in relation to the
collective management of copyright — Application for suspen-
sion of operation of a measure — No urgency)

(2009/C 32/71)

Language of the case: Italian

Operative part of the order

Parties

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. Costs are reserved.

Applicant: Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (SIAE) (Rome,
Italy)
(represented by: M. Siragusa, M. Mandel, L. Vullo and
S. Valentino, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Di Bucci and F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/37

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Article 4(2) of
Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008
relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of
the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. Costs are reserved.

Action brought on 23 October 2008 — Toland v
Parliament

(Case T-471/08)

(2009/C 32/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ciarán Toland (Dublin, Ireland)
Burke, Solicitor, E. Regan, SC)

(represented by: A.

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

— Annul decision A(2008) 10636 of Vice-President Dianna
Wallis MEP of the Bureau of the European Parliament of
11 August 2008 addressed to Ciaran Toland insofar as it
refused the applicant access
to Internal Audit Report
No 06/02 concluded on 9 January 2008 of the Internal
Audit Service of the European Parliament entitled ‘Audit of
the Parliamentary Assistance Allowance’;

— Order the European Parliament to grant the applicant access
to Internal Audit Report No 06/02 concluded on 9 January
2008 of
the European
Parliament entitled ‘Audit of the Parliamentary Assistance
Allowance’;

the Internal Audit Service of

— Order the European Parliament to pay the applicant's costs

of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

On 11 June 2008,
the applicant applied to the European
Parliament for access to the 2006 Annual Report of the Euro-
pean Parliament Internal Audit Service, including the 16 Audit
reports referred to in paragraph 24 of the European Parliament
Resolution of 22 April 2008. By letter of 23 June 2008, the
applicant was granted partial access to one of the reports, the
Internal Audit Report 07/01, and made a confirmatory applica-
tion on the basis of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC)
No 1049/2001 (1) for full access to the 16 Audit Reports. By
letter of 11 August 2008, which came to the knowledge of the

applicant on 20 August 2008,
the Vice-President of The
European Parliament replied to the application granting access
to 13 of the requested Internal Audit Reports, partial access to
2 of the other reports, while refusing access to one of them.

On the basis of its application made pursuant to Article 230 EC
and in accordance to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, the appli-
cant seeks partial annulment of Decision A(2008) 10636 of
11 August 2008, insofar as it rejected the applicant's request to
obtain access to Report No 06/02 of the Internal Audit Service
entitled ‘Audit of the Parliamentary Assistance Allowance’.

The applicant submits that the contested decision is vitiated by
manifest errors of law and of fact, is disproportionate and fails
to state reasons, in that:

(a) it advanced no grounds sustainable in law for refusal of

access;

(b) it abrogated to itself a discretion which it doesn't have in
failing to have regard to the provisions of the legislation;

(c) insofar as it advanced no legitimate grounds for refusal of
access under Article 4(2) third indent or Article 4(3) of
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001;

(d) it failed to consider whether there was an overriding public
interest which might outweigh the grounds for refusal;

(e) the Vice-President failed to find that the interests of democ-
racy, openness and transparency are overriding public inter-
ests which outweigh the grounds for refusal;

(f) it acknowledged that Internal Audit Report made recom-
mendations for implementation of action plans within the
regulatory and legislative process or failed to find that the
interests of democracy, openness an transparency in the
regulatory and legislative process are matters of citizen
participation which constitute overriding public interest in
disclosure.

(1) Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European
Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145,
p. 43).

Action brought on 31 October 2008 — Umbach v
Commission

(Case T-474/08)

(2009/C 32/73)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dieter C. Umbach (represented by: M. Stephani,
lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities